With major stock indexes marching higher—the Dow Jones industrial average, having blown past the 13,000 milestone, is in record territory, and the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index is only 1.7% away from its all-time high of 1527—it's time to reassess equity valuations. The S&P 500, a broad benchmark for large-cap stocks, now trades at 18.35 times its 12-month trailing earnings, as of May 2.
Is it still possible to identify stocks that are relatively cheap? We will take a shot in this week's screen.
This time around, we wanted to use not one but four filters to identify stocks trading at attractive valuations. This week's screen searched for stocks that are in the lowest 20% in terms of three valuation metrics:
1. Price-to-sales
2. Price-to-book value
3. Price-to-earnings based on estimated EPS for the next 12 months
The lower the ratio for these three metrics, the better the value.
Then we turned to one of our proprietary measures, S&P's Fair Value model, a quantitative stock ranking system. The model calculates a stock's weekly Fair Value—the price at which it should trade at current market levels—based on fundamental data such as corporate earnings and growth potential, return on equity, current yield relative to the S&P 500, and price-to-book value.
Stocks are ranked from 5, indicating significant undervaluation compared to the Fair Value universe, to 1, indicating significant overvaluation. We looked for those issues ranked 5.
To avoid speculative issues, each stock has at least a $5 per share price, and a $500 million market cap.
When the screen was finished, four names emerged.
| Company
|
|---|
| Chiquita Brands (CQB)
|
| Conseco (CNO)
|
| Lithia Motors (LAD)
|
| YRC Worldwide (YRCW)
|
Kaye, an analyst for Standard & Poor's Portfolio Services, is the author of The Standard & Poor's Guide to Selecting Stocks.
All of the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect the research analyst's personal views regarding any and all of the subject securities or issuers. No part of analyst compensation was, is or will be, directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this research report. Standard & Poor's Regulatory Disclosure
Any advice, analysis, or recommendations contained in articles labeled "Insight from Standard & Poor's" reflect the views of Standard & Poor's, which operates separately from and independently of BusinessWeek Online. It is possible that BWOL may from time to time publish information that is not consistent with advice, analysis, or recommendations that are published by Standard & Poor's. Standard & Poor's and BusinessWeek Online are each units of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.