(page 2 of 2)
Most of his holdings aren't particularly high-yielding, he says. The fund as a whole has a gross pre-expense yield of roughly 2.5 percent, vs. the 2.05 percent yield on the S&P 500 index.
Since the Thornburg Investment Income Builder's mandate is to increase its dividend per share each year, Remily says he looks for companies that, in the face of a tax hike, would still be willing to increase their dividend. He steers clear of "marginal dividend payers" that either prefer share buybacks or are in a weak financial position.
"I try to find companies with good business models and that have good internal cash generation," he says. "Instead of spending a lot of time analyzing the income statement, I spend time on the cash statement. I look at cash flow less [capital expenditures on current operations] and does that cover the dividend?" For example, if a company's free cash flow is double its annual dividend payout, that's a signal it is able to grow its business while paying a healthy but not excessive dividend, he says. He also looks at whether a company has a history of meeting its earnings and dividend forecasts.
Four out of five companies in his portfolio are expected to maintain or raise their dividend in the future. He cites McDonald's (MCD) as an example. The company's profits are growing at 10 to 12 percent per year and its dividend is expected to increase by 9 percent. Its recent turnaround, which included selling more of its company-owned stores to franchisees, lightened McDonald's asset base and boosted its cash generation.
While "there's nothing I can do to protect the individual investor from dividend tax increases," Remily says, a skilled stockpicker should be able to put together a portfolio that protects investors from dividend cuts. He estimates that the aggregate value of his portfolio is far below its intrinsic value and sees a weighted average appreciation potential of 35 percent for the portfolio.
The impact of the largest possible tax hike on certain investors, especially retirees, would be more serious than on companies, since the growing income stream from dividends is often their only defense against inflation, says Remily. If the tax rate surges to nearly 40 percent, "you've just lost 25 percent of your income going to tax penalties. If you're living on $1,000 a month, now you're at $750 a month." That would compound the lingering cash crunch of the recession for retirees, he says.
With the broad stock market down 13 percent since a recent peak on Apr. 23, and mounting concerns about how severe an impact economic slowing in China and Europe will have on the U.S., there's a lot of trepidation about U.S.equities. The effect of higher tax rates on both dividends and capital gains exacerbates those worries.
Silverblatt predicts that the tax hike will spur buying and selling ahead of the change, which would make for a volatile fourth quarter of 2010. "If I'm sitting on a lot of profit [from my stock positions], do I want to sell and, if I still like the company, come back to it in a month? If I get a gain, do I want to take it before the capital-gains rate changes?"
Jere Estes, co-manager of Rising Dividend Growth Fund (ICRDX), thinks some people are overestimating the adverse effect of the higher tax rate on stock prices. It won't make much difference in how investors treat their dividend-paying stocks, except for "maybe some psychological impact," he says.
With yields on cash and Treasury bonds so low, investors can still get a yield of as much as 5 percent on stable equities or 8 percent by owning units of an energy master limited partnership, he says. While investors' preferences aren't likely to change, companies' capital allocation decisions probably will. He doesn't expect to see companies initiating a dividend as Microsoft (MSFT) did just months before the Bush tax cuts took effect so that top managers and employees could save money on the tax they paid on stock options, adds Estes.
That may be so, but Silverblatt at S&P expects the pace at which companies raise their dividends to pick up again near the end of the third quarter or early in the fourth quarter "if—a huge if—the economy continues to get better and jobs tick up."
Bogoslaw is a reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek's Finance channel.
Track and share business topics across the Web.