Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Are Things So Bad That Financial Reform Can Wait?

Posted by: David Henry on February 22

Should world leaders try to fix financial regulation before stabilizing the world economy? It is a question that divided some of the most influential people in economics late last week at an invitation-only conference at Columbia University’s Center on Capitalism and Society. The participants included three Nobel Prize winners, hedge fund legend George Soros, Christine Lagarde, the finance minister of France and Paul Volcker, the former Federal Reserve chief now chairing President Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board.

Lagarde called for “speedy” reforms “because time is of the essence.” Soros said not-so-fast. Volcker said he is inclined to side with Soros on the point. It is probably better to wait “until we have a better sense of where we want to go and a better sense of how this crisis is going to work its way out,” said Volcker.

Why not move quickly? Because the financial order is changing so dramatically that the subjects of regulation are a moving target, said Malcolm Knight, a vice-chairman of Deutsche Bank and former general manager of the Bureau of International Settlements, the Basel-based central bank of government central banks. “In these circumstances it is very hard to determine how the regulatory environment should be reformed,” Knight said. Soros said “it is a matter of priorities,” that regulatory reform should not take away from work to end the crisis.

Lagarde argued that it is better to act now and get the new regulatory regime 80% right rather than deliver a 100% perfect plan that is so late it is wrong. She wants to quickly “send out very strong signals” to the public and bankers that finance will be “regulated better, regulated deeper…and actually discipline players.” On Sunday, European leaders meeting ahead of the April 2 summit of the Group of 20 nations agreed to press for limits on executive bonuses, a stronger role for the International Monetary Fund, and other reforms.

Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate and professor at Columbia, said changing financial market regulation is an important step toward rebuilding confidence the world economy needs. Willem Buiter, professor at the London School of Economics, said governments should act to set regulation right while the financial industry is on its knees. “If we wait, they will have regained their lobbying and political power,” Buiter said. Indeed, momentum for regulatory reform during the Asian financial crisis of 1997 dissipated after that situation stabilized, noted Stiglitz.

Volcker doubts there will be a problem with a lost urgency for reform this time around. “I don’t think this crisis will be forgotten very quickly,” Volcker said. “We’re going to hear reverberations from this for a long time.”

Reader Comments

Hugo van Randwyck

February 23, 2009 04:49 AM

Financial reforms are needed to speed up a broad based economic recovery. These reforms will mean less income and sales for the financial sector - so now is the time to implement them! Making any home loan, need a 10% deposit, and a maximum loan of 2.5 times one income, will ensure lower house prices and rents - this could be gradually introduced e.g. start with 4 times, then 3.75 etc. House prices could fall 50% quickly, and so could rents, boosting purchasing power. With 37 million households renting, a $300 a month reduction in rent will give more than $10 billion a month increase in purchasing power - a structural improvement, not a one off, from government borrowing/rebate.

Barbara D Holtzman

February 24, 2009 02:29 PM

Unfortunately Hugo, few are interested in "structural improvements." They infinitely prefer "one offs," if not as many "offs" as they can suck off the government. Just as the financial and real estate sectors thrived (for a while) on easy money and easy credit, they now want an easy fix - "just give us the money to get out of this mess and we promise we'll do better going forward"; I've heard hundreds of finance guys say essentially that (and they aren't at all happy that I disagree), That Chap. 11 won't do it, the banks, car companies, etc. are "too big to fail," and that the only way out is using taxpayer money. Stimulus never comes from throwing good money after bad, never has, never will - and it won't work this time either.

Thank you for your interest. This blog is no longer active.



BusinessWeek's Adrienne Carter, Jessica Silver-Greenberg, and David Henry deconstruct the mysteries of high finance, Wall Street, and hedge funds for pros and ordinary investors. E-mail them directly if you've got tips about big deals, a hedge fund, or even securities industry gossip.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!