Is BlackRock-Barclays Good for ETFs?

Posted by: Lauren Young on June 12, 2009

Is it a good thing or a bad thing for exchange-traded funds that BlackRock has emerged as the buyer for the Barclays PLC’s iShares unit? BlackRock is spending $13.5 billion in cash and stock, which is a considerable sum given the economic environment.

(One of my colleagues was rooting for Bank of New York because “they needed it more.”)

The fact that so many top-tier firms were vying for a piece of the ETF business bodes well for the industry. As BusinessWeek previously noted, it tells the world that BlackRock (and other would-be buyers) see exchange-traded funds as having a very hopeful future. Indeed, ETF guru Jim Wiandt of IndexUniverse says: “This BlackRock deal is big not just for the index/ETF industry, but the financial sector in general. It underscores just how big basis-point-linked passive assets have gotten.”

As a firm, BlackRock has already done a respectable job absorbing Merrill Lynch’s mutual funds. Morningstar gives it above-average scores for its domestic stock, international stock, and municipal bond funds. Wiandt says that, on paper at least, “it’s a marriage made in heaven, with BGI in a dominant position where BlackRock is mostly absent: ETFs and institutional indexed asset management.”

Will BlackRock be a good steward of the ETF business? What do you think?

Post a comment

 

About

Bloomberg Businessweek’s Ben Steverman focuses on the latest moves in financial markets and emerging trends in stocks, bonds, and funds, always with an eye toward giving readers a better understanding of the sometimes confusing and often chaotic world of money. Standard & Poor’s senior index analyst Howard Silverblatt will also provide his take on companies’ finances and the markets. Voted one of the “Top 100 Finance Blogs” in 2007.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!