Posted by: Lauren Young on June 12
Is it a good thing or a bad thing for exchange-traded funds that BlackRock has emerged as the buyer for the Barclays PLC’s iShares unit? BlackRock is spending $13.5 billion in cash and stock, which is a considerable sum given the economic environment.
(One of my colleagues was rooting for Bank of New York because “they needed it more.”)
The fact that so many top-tier firms were vying for a piece of the ETF business bodes well for the industry. As BusinessWeek previously noted, it tells the world that BlackRock (and other would-be buyers) see exchange-traded funds as having a very hopeful future. Indeed, ETF guru Jim Wiandt of IndexUniverse says: “This BlackRock deal is big not just for the index/ETF industry, but the financial sector in general. It underscores just how big basis-point-linked passive assets have gotten.”
As a firm, BlackRock has already done a respectable job absorbing Merrill Lynch’s mutual funds. Morningstar gives it above-average scores for its domestic stock, international stock, and municipal bond funds. Wiandt says that, on paper at least, “it’s a marriage made in heaven, with BGI in a dominant position where BlackRock is mostly absent: ETFs and institutional indexed asset management.”
Will BlackRock be a good steward of the ETF business? What do you think?
Businessweek’s Lauren Young, Aaron Pressman, Emily Thornton, Amy Feldman, Ben Levisohn, and Ben Steverman focus on matters great and small for investors, from the views of a hot fund manager to an explanation of the latest products devised by Wall Street’s rocket scientists. Exploring trends in any area, from bonds and stocks to closed-end funds and futures, always with an eye towards giving investors a better understanding of the sometimes confusing and often chaotic world of finance. Standard & Poor’s senior index analyst Howard Silverblatt will also provide his take on companies’ finances and the markets. Voted one of the “Top 100 Finance Blogs” in 2007.