Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Funds: An Awful Year for Active Managers

Posted by: Ben Steverman on December 19, 2008

In the past year, fund managers have flopped.

I’m not just talking about the likes of Bernard Madoff. Your honest, everyday mutual fund stock picker has also done a lousy job.

According to TrimTabs Investment Research, the net asset value of equity mutual funds is down 45% in the last year. According to Morningstar, the average domestic stock fund is off 42% this year. (The broad S&P 500 stock index is off “only” 38%.)

Of the thousands of domestic equity funds tracked by Morningstar, not one is likely to provide a positive return in 2008.

Active managers of stock funds usually have a hard time beating the performance of the broader market. That’s one reason I and many other people choose to invest in low-fee, passively managed stock index funds rather than managed mutual funds.

Many assume, however, that active managers will do better in tough markets, when they can take advantage of volatility and market irrationality to make money for their investors.

Tim Byrne, Director of Wealth Management Research at Robert W. Baird & Co., studied the issue and found it is true historically — at least over the last 20 years — that “active managers tend to perform best (i.e., provide the most excess return) in negative return environments. [They] have proven to be better at down market protection than up market protection.”

So why this year, during the toughest market in a lifetime, have active managers flopped?

This is not like other bear markets, Byrne says. “The sell-off was broad in nature, offering little opportunity for avoidance.” Only 7% of the S&P 500 posted a gain in the 12 months ending Oct. 31, 2008, Byrne notes. In the terrible year for the market ending Sept. 31, 2001, however, 45% of stocks moved higher.

“There has been no place to hide in the equity market,” Byrne says. Large, mid or small-cap, value, core or growth, U.S. or international — all the categories dropped 30% or more.

Some active managers may still be providing value for investors, though it’s never easy to know who those will be in advance. A vast array of respected managers are struggling, Byrne notes, including Bill Miller, Ken Heebner, Fidelity’s Will Danoff and others.

I wonder if this market might eventually move from a crisis mode into more normal bear market conditions, i.e. conditions more typical of past recessions. If such progress occurred, active managers might make themselves more useful. For now, it’s a tough time to be picking stocks.

Reader Comments


December 19, 2008 5:59 PM

The Dow Jones gained 359 points on Monday, and gained only a net total of 15 points for the week even with the Auto 'bail-out' by the White House. What's left now to move the Dow in an upward fashion? It looks like last year's repeat of a 1,300+ point drop for the Dow from now til the end of January seems likely. Hopefully no more Ponzi schemes will be exposed. Let's hope!


December 19, 2008 7:05 PM

“active managers tend to perform best (i.e., provide the most excess return) in negative return environments."
Please explain this one to me. The stock market is a zero sum game and if one active manager outperforms then there has to be another one that underperforms by the same amount. Am I missing something here? Who is the loser on the other side of this outperformance?


December 19, 2008 8:23 PM

Dear Wall Street: The pain you are suffering is the pain you have been inflicting on us for many years with all your machinations. Some of us have literally died for your greed.

Armin Stuk

December 21, 2008 5:50 AM

An awful year? But, probably not,if your time horizon is 30 years or forever, and have a patience and stomach see your portfolio of stocks doing nothing for many years, what most of us don't have.

Post a comment



Bloomberg Businessweek’s Ben Steverman focuses on the latest moves in financial markets and emerging trends in stocks, bonds, and funds, always with an eye toward giving readers a better understanding of the sometimes confusing and often chaotic world of money. Standard & Poor’s senior index analyst Howard Silverblatt will also provide his take on companies’ finances and the markets. Voted one of the “Top 100 Finance Blogs” in 2007.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!