Signs of an ETF Backlash

Posted by: Ben Steverman on August 26, 2008

At first, exchange-traded funds were a genuine innovation. Then, ETFs became a fad, the butt of Wall Street jokes as ETF after ETF sliced and diced the stock market in ridiculously specific ways. Now, it seems an ETF backlash is afoot.

ETFs have popped up for everything from timber to nanotechnology to water. ETF providers pull together a basket of equities that purport to benefit from some trend, then create an ETF based on those stocks.

I don’t doubt that there are some benefits to individual investors from the ETF concept. Jim Wiandt makes the case for the ETF concept here, arguing ETF’s popularity will eventually surpass that of traditional mutual funds. For one thing, fees are often quite low on ETFs compared to mutual funds, and even exotic ETFs have their uses, by giving U.S. investors access to stocks they might not easily buy otherwise.

However, the ETF craze has led to a whole industry whose entire goal is apparently to just think up new ETFs. With ETFs chasing the latest hot investment idea, you end up with a fad (the ETF concept) chasing more fads. That puts investors in some dangerous territory.

This week, XShares Advisors said it will close 15 of its 19 HealthShares ETFs. Apparently investors decided they could live without an ophthalmology ETF; a “dermatology and wound care” ETF; or an ETF focused on orthopedic repair. (I am not making those up.)

As Paul Justice at Morningstar pointed out, some thematic ETFs often don’t even do a good job reflecting their themes in their stock holdings. One wind power ETF includes firms like BP (BP). He writes:

Wind power is about as important to their overall returns as frog legs are to a balanced diet. In fact, a $1 change in the long-term average price of natural gas will have more impact on these companies than will doubling their wind power capacity.

Greg Newton of NakedShorts had an interesting take on the Morningstar article in a post titled “Morningstar gets an ETF clue. Huzzah!” He adds, however: “The good thing is that, last I checked, nobody’s forcing anybody to buy this stuff.”

And that’s true. Wall Street has a way of producing lots of silly products, and the only harm is done when people actually buy them.

Reader Comments

purebushit!

August 26, 2008 7:20 PM

The only financial innovation from Wall Street is how they get away with RICO and corruption. Could it be, bush-cheney waving the TERRORIST CAMPAIGN flag and FORCING all govt entities to LOOK THE OTHER WAY, as his base, keeps shoveling money to BOTH Parties, altho the Repubs are on their way OUT!

Phillip

August 26, 2008 8:14 PM

ETFs are vital for leveraging sector-industry momentum without individual stock risk. Irony is that many industries dont have representative ETFs or they get dominated by one huge company. For example APPLE's market cap dominates its industry (PCs) while the bulk of its market cap was driven by iPod,IPhone which are really consumer products competing with SNE.
--- phillip finance.degree7.com

MurrayR

August 27, 2008 1:52 PM

Indeed there are some funky ETFs on the market, but another of their advantages is the ability for the individual investor to more easily invest in emerging markets and commodities (or both)...

http://www.contrarianprofits.com/guide-to-the-best-commodity-etfs

Post a comment

 

About

Bloomberg Businessweek’s Ben Steverman focuses on the latest moves in financial markets and emerging trends in stocks, bonds, and funds, always with an eye toward giving readers a better understanding of the sometimes confusing and often chaotic world of money. Standard & Poor’s senior index analyst Howard Silverblatt will also provide his take on companies’ finances and the markets. Voted one of the “Top 100 Finance Blogs” in 2007.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!