Posted by: Ben Steverman on June 27
Wall Street has a love-hate relationship with its research analysts. On the one hand, equity analysts have a decidedly mixed record of accurately predicting the future. If you bought when your typical analyst rates a stock a “buy,” you’d probably be no better off than buying when he or she said “sell.”
Yet analysts do move stocks. Investors are clearly influenced by the daily upgrades and downgrades.
I would explain this by arguing that research analysts embody the Wall Street consensus.
A writer once observed, “How do I know what I think until I see what I say?” Many things don’t crystallize until you write them down.
Research notes serve this purpose for Wall Street. They demonstrate to the investment community what it is thinking about a particular stock or industry.
And in the past week, something has crystallized: The financial sector, especially the big banks and brokers, are in trouble. As I write here, I think this growing consensus contributed to stock’s big sell-off on June 26.
Businessweek’s Lauren Young, Aaron Pressman, Matthew Goldstein, Emily Thornton, Amy Feldman, Ben Levisohn, and Ben Steverman focus on matters great and small for investors, from the views of a hot fund manager to an explanation of the latest products devised by Wall Street’s rocket scientists. Exploring trends in any area, from bonds and stocks to closed-end funds and futures, always with an eye towards giving investors a better understanding of the sometimes confusing and often chaotic world of finance. Standard & Poor’s senior index analyst Howard Silverblatt will also provide his take on companies’ finances and the markets. Voted one of the “Top 100 Finance Blogs” in 2007.