Posted by: Ben Steverman on June 27
Wall Street has a love-hate relationship with its research analysts. On the one hand, equity analysts have a decidedly mixed record of accurately predicting the future. If you bought when your typical analyst rates a stock a “buy,” you’d probably be no better off than buying when he or she said “sell.”
Yet analysts do move stocks. Investors are clearly influenced by the daily upgrades and downgrades.
I would explain this by arguing that research analysts embody the Wall Street consensus.
A writer once observed, “How do I know what I think until I see what I say?” Many things don’t crystallize until you write them down.
Research notes serve this purpose for Wall Street. They demonstrate to the investment community what it is thinking about a particular stock or industry.
And in the past week, something has crystallized: The financial sector, especially the big banks and brokers, are in trouble. As I write here, I think this growing consensus contributed to stock’s big sell-off on June 26.
Businessweek’s Lauren Young, Aaron Pressman, Emily Thornton, Amy Feldman, Ben Levisohn, and Ben Steverman focus on matters great and small for investors, from the views of a hot fund manager to an explanation of the latest products devised by Wall Street’s rocket scientists. Exploring trends in any area, from bonds and stocks to closed-end funds and futures, always with an eye towards giving investors a better understanding of the sometimes confusing and often chaotic world of finance. Standard & Poor’s senior index analyst Howard Silverblatt will also provide his take on companies’ finances and the markets. Voted one of the “Top 100 Finance Blogs” in 2007.