Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

PENSIONS AND MEDICAL BENEFITS – Don’t Bet You Retirement On It and Don’t Get Sick

Posted by: Howard Silverblatt on May 25, 2008

Bottom Line: In the end, individuals, either as taxpayers or consumers, will pay the bill.
The reality is just as our children may not ‘have it as good’ as we did, our retirement may not be as ‘good’ as our parents.

The full May 19, 2008 S&P research paper S&P 500 2007: Pensions and Other Post Employment Benefits, complete with issue level data is available here

Equity issues in general are in much better shape with respect to their pensions than the public sector. The reason simply is that they are required to be so under statute.

As a group, S&P 500 issuers returned to their fully funded status with $1.5 trillion in assets, which was $63 billion over their $1.44 trillion in obligations. Funding improved to 104% from 97%, but remained well below the 128% level at the end of Bull Market in 1999. Over funded plans increased to 36% of the issuers, from 23% last year. Discount rates rose for the third year in a row, and now stand at 6.13%, compared to 5.75%, with the change again reducing projected benefit obligations. Estimated pension return rates were basically unchanged, declining 1 bp to 8.02%, but still marked the seventh consecutive annual reduction. The spread between the discount and return rate has now been reduced to 189 pbs from the 303 pbs two years ago, and stands near its fifteen-year average.

The breakdown in U.S. and non-U.S funds has widened. U.S. invested funds, which have 85% of the assets and 83% of the obligations, were over funded by 7.0% in 2007, compared to the non-U.S. funds that were under funded by 8.8%. Asset allocations continue to shift out of equities and into fixed income. In aggregate, U.S. funds of $1.2 trillion reduced their equity allocation to 54.4% from 60.3%, with the fixed income component increasing to 33.9% from 30.0%. Non-U.S. funds of $214 billion shifted in the same direction, with equity allocation decreasing to 56.2% from 59.8%; fixed income increased to 37.7% from 34.6%.

For 2008, companies expect an 8% return. Based on the current domestic and international returns, they are about $100 billion short of that mark. However, the hope is that oil prices may be peaking, and when added to the tax refunds, stimulus package, and 325 fewer basis points courtesy of the Federal Reserve, there will be sufficient time for the market to rebound. We expect pensions to remain fully funded in aggregate this year; however, we also expect that companies will have to contribute a bit more than they are currently expecting to do in order to stay that way.

The bottom line for OPEBs is that they are also in better shape than their public counter parts, but the condition is only positive in relative terms. Only 43% of the issuers had OPEB funds, which resulted in a 30.7% funding rate; the other 57% had no funds and were totally on a pay-as-you-go basis. While we group pensions and OPEBs together, they have two key differences. First, pensions have the backing of the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation, while OPEBs have no such support or fallback position; and second, unlike pensions that have required funding and legal standing, most OPEBs are not regulatory in nature and can be modified either arbitrarily or through labor negotiations. Currently we are experiencing pullbacks in benefits to U.S. domestic employees, as well as fewer workers being covered for benefits. More substantial, a shift in expenses from the company to the individual via increased co-payments and premiums is occurring. We expect these to continue on, as companies continue cost control measures.

From a company prospective, this is a necessary shift. As U.S. economic dominance has shifted, or depending upon the blame factor, deteriorated, the ability of companies to pass along to consumers the costs associated with retirement has significantly diminished. Global pressures have now forced U.S. concerns to scale back their retirement benefits to remain competitive. While the vast majority of companies have the cash resources to fund and pay OPEBs, they actually spent over twice the total OPEB under funding in buybacks last year, the matter is now one of global survivorship. The need to remain competitive within global markets that provide different benefits based on national boundaries are not new, but U.S. companies can no longer afford the disadvantage.

Eventually, the government, in conjunction with the private sector, will be forced to address the matter. The concern is that neither has shown a tolerance for the pain associated with the type of forward action needed. In the end, individuals, either as taxpayers or consumers, will pay the bill. The reality for many potential retirees is that, just as their children may not ‘have it as good’ as they did, their retirement may not be as ‘good’ as their parents.

Reader Comments


October 10, 2008 2:29 AM

This scheme looks pretty useful for our career as well as health.Thank you for sharing useful informations.

Retirement Plans, Retirement Savings, Retirement Investments,Retirement Income, Retirement Funds,Home based Business


October 15, 2008 2:45 AM

The grand jury report also cites a conflict of interest on the part of the Napa County Board of Supervisors and Napa City Council, who are involved in compensation negotiations from which they directly benefit.

retirement plans,retirement planning calculator, retirement planning, early retirement planning, retirement savings, retirement investments, financial planning for retirement, saving for retirement, retirement income,
retirement funds


November 6, 2008 11:22 PM

Thank you for sharing useful information.Here i got a query, Can a disabled adult child collect benifit's on a parent pension? Can anyone share their opinion in it.

James Morgan - Puritan Financial Advisor

August 16, 2010 12:17 AM

The bottom line for OPEBs is that they are also in better shape than their public counter parts, but the condition is only positive in relative terms.

Post a comment



Bloomberg Businessweek’s Ben Steverman focuses on the latest moves in financial markets and emerging trends in stocks, bonds, and funds, always with an eye toward giving readers a better understanding of the sometimes confusing and often chaotic world of money. Standard & Poor’s senior index analyst Howard Silverblatt will also provide his take on companies’ finances and the markets. Voted one of the “Top 100 Finance Blogs” in 2007.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!