Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Crocs: Where were the analysts?

Posted by: Ben Steverman on May 8, 2008

Crocs (CROX), the maker of ugly, comfortable and wildly popular shoes, saw its share price jump 14.5% Thursday after reporting earnings. However, Crocs shares are still 84% off its Oct. 31 high.
It’s a classic tale of stock market hubris, one that has been repeated many times. The stock fell from a high of 74.75 to a low of 9.63 in late April, when it finally was clear to many, many investors that Crocs was another Krispy Kreme (KKD) or Snapple — a fad stock that fizzled.
Some skeptical takes on Crocs are here and here, and a more balanced take from Robert Walberg is here.
To me, Crocs fit the mold of a fad or ‘story stock’ perfectly, as I wrote last November here and here. Yes, Crocs could be — as its supporters insist — the next Nike (NKE). But, as is now clear, it was also the subject of a ridiculous amount of stock market hype. The stock tripled in the first ten months of 2007.
One of the most disturbing things about Crocs’ wild ride has been the lack of skepticism from analysts. Almost all of Crocs’ analysts bought into its growth story and encouraged clients to buy more shares, even after the stock’s collapse in November. Even now, none of Crocs’ nine analysts have a ‘sell’ rating on the stock, and three have a buy (or outperform) rating.
With the stock at such a low level, they might be right. (Thursday’s spike showed the stock still has some buyers.) But these analysts’ track record leaves something to be desired.

Reader Comments


May 8, 2008 10:41 PM

Interesting, I didn't even know Crocs had a stock, however, here in HK and in mainland China, there are pirated Crocs sold everywhere. I've looked at both the authentic and copies and really don't see much difference in them except the price. The pirated copies cost about 10-20 times less than the authentic ones without that much of a dropoff in quality..


May 19, 2008 1:22 PM

Except that the knock offs are not made from the same material as the real Crocs, and thus have none of the excellent properties which real Crocs have. It's like paying a dollar for a piece of paper that looks like a dollar, those knock offs have no value.

Post a comment



Bloomberg Businessweek’s Ben Steverman focuses on the latest moves in financial markets and emerging trends in stocks, bonds, and funds, always with an eye toward giving readers a better understanding of the sometimes confusing and often chaotic world of money. Standard & Poor’s senior index analyst Howard Silverblatt will also provide his take on companies’ finances and the markets. Voted one of the “Top 100 Finance Blogs” in 2007.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!