Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Big uh-oh for new Claymore Oil ETFs

Posted by: Aaron Pressman on January 17, 2007

Greg Newton over at the NakedShorts blog has highlighted a huge defect in the new Claymore Macroshares oil ETFs today. Recall, this is the paired ETF, with one tracking the price of an oil futures contract (under the symbol UCR) and the other doing the opposite (under the symbol DCR). The idea was to cut the costs of actually having to manage a portfolio of futures contracts and instead just have assets switched back and forth through a derivatives contract between the two ETFs.

Well, as Newton points out, the sponsors failed to account for the fact that there might be a lot more investor interest on one side of the trade than the other. In the early going, in fact, there’s been about five times more volume in the UCR than the DCR shares. Oops. Complications also arise from the fact that when the funds’ benchmark futures contract expires, the funds are supposed to track the following month’s contract. But the futures market has been anticipating a rebound in oil prices, creating a bump up in the price of futures contracts that mature later.

Typically, ETFs as a class have traded very close to their net asset value per share. That’s because, unlike closed-end funds, institutional investors can turn in shares for the underlying assets or create new shares by exchanging the assets. That hasn’t been happening it seems with the Claymore Macroshares. As of last Friday, UCR was trading at a price almost 12% above the level of its net asset value and DCR was trading at a 5% discount. On at least one day this week, the fund shares didn’t even moved in the correct direction. The futures contract for oil that the two are supposed to track lost 3.4% on Tuesday, so UCR should have lost a similar amount with DCR gaining. Instead, UCR lost only 2.3%, a third less than the benchmark, and DCR also lost 2%, Newton points out.

There may be a variety of lessons to be drawn, but first and foremost I’d say that investors should avoid new ETFs based on unusual structures until the funds have seasoned a bit and demonstrated that they’ll work as advertised.

Reader Comments

Michael Gallucci

January 23, 2007 10:57 PM

what is a production index ?

Post a comment



Bloomberg Businessweek’s Ben Steverman focuses on the latest moves in financial markets and emerging trends in stocks, bonds, and funds, always with an eye toward giving readers a better understanding of the sometimes confusing and often chaotic world of money. Standard & Poor’s senior index analyst Howard Silverblatt will also provide his take on companies’ finances and the markets. Voted one of the “Top 100 Finance Blogs” in 2007.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!