Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

Why Forrest Gump's electric car really is better for the environment

Posted by: Adam Aston on October 29, 2007

I’ve had a couple of questions on my last post asking: don’t electric cars just shift the pollution away from a car’s tailpipe and to a power plant’s smokestack? This is true, BUT the more important point is that that’s a good thing. Battery-powered vehicles charged up from today’s grid are sooooo much more efficient that, even when charged up from a coal plant, they emit less total green house gases (GHGs) than a similar vehicle burning gasoline. This is for one key reason: electric systems are dramatically more energy efficient than combustion engines, so much so that even accounting for the GHGs emitted from the the nation’s dirtiest power sources (such as pulverized coal) fewer tones of CO2 are lofted into the atmosphere to move a car electrically than to burn gasoline in an engine. And if carbon capture and sequestration ever becomes a reality, of course, it will be easier to capture and stash the CO2 from a single power plant smokestack than from millions of tailpipes. The most recent detailed work in this area that I’m familiar with was published earlier this year by the NRDC in cooperation with EPRI, the power industry’s research arm. The report, “Environmental Assessment of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles” examines plug-in hybrids rather than pure battery powered cars. PHEVs will run on batteries until they’re depleted, then switch over to a small backup gas engine for propulsion and/or to recharge the battery. The graph below is drawn from the report and shows how a plug in hybrid with a battery range of 20 miles (a PHEV20) compares to today’s gas powered cars. In a gas powered car, the vast majority of GHGs are produced during the combustion of gas in the engine (the red portion of the left most bar). The more gas you replace with with electricity — even from “old” pulverized coal powered plants — the lower GHG emissions fall. Using cleaner sources of electricity such as renewables or nuclear, further cuts down emissions from driving (the columns to the right). Though not depicted here, a pure battery-powered vehicle powered exclusively by renewable energy (from solar, wind or hyrdro) would have virtually no GHG emissions. Though the right battery technology remains a long way off, this is the holy grail for green car zealots, but is already being worked on by DIY garage mechanics. Plug in “electric cars solar energy” into Youtube and dozens of demos pop up. For more on this issue, check out CalCars’ discussion of electric vehicles.

PHEV ghg intensity.JPG

Acronymns above:
Adv SCPC = Advanced Super Critical Pulverized Coal
CC = Carbon capture
CCS = Carbon capture and sequestration
GHGs = Green house gases
IGCC = Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
GT = Gas (natural) turbine
PHEV = Plug-in hybrid vehicle.

Gasoline well to tank = GHGs produced in the drilling and refining of oil into gas, and delivery of gas to a gas station.
Gasoline tank to wheels = GHGs emitted from combustion of gas in a car engine.
Electricity well to wheels = GHGs emitted along the entire path of creating and using electricity to move a car, from excavation at the coal mine (or creation at the wind mill), over the wires and into your car’s batteries.

Reader Comments

EV Rider

November 1, 2007 6:30 AM

Plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs) and all-electric vehicles (EVs) offer overwhelming advantages, both environmental and financial, over gas-driven vehicles. PHEVs offer the range of hybrids (500 miles or more), plus the benefit of all-electric power for short trips, which dramatically reduces gas consumption. EVs require no gasoline whatsoever, and when recharged from renewable energy sources, produce zero total emissions.

We are beginning to see a true renaissance of scientific thought emerging that will impact our world in a very positive way. As we learn to depend less and less on foreign oil, I believe our economy and our world will be positively changed for the better. We've Seen the Future . . and It's Electric!

(Google 'Village Energy' for more).

Sarah A.

October 28, 2009 3:46 PM

Im doing a project on Electric cars (the pro's)this was the most information I have found and I have been working on this for a week! I have to debate on whether EV's are better for the environment and Im sure this will help me dominate! Haha. So thanks sooo much ! ! !

Post a comment



BusinessWeek correspondents John Carey and Mark Scott, cover the green scene, keeping on top of the business aspects of energy, the environment and climate change, as well as the technologies, policies, markets and people that are shaping how the earth's resources will be used in the century ahead.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!