<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>
<channel>

<title>Next:  Innovation Tools &amp; Trends - BusinessWeek</title>
<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/</link>
<description>Read the top trends in innovation blog. Get the latest innovative business ideas and stay updated with innovative tools and technologies.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:15:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.16</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 


<item>	
	<title>Scitable Mixes Science, Crowdsourcing, and Social Networking</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I spoke with Vikram Savkar, senior vp and publishing director of Nature Education. He's also the head of Scitable.com, a Web site that mixes elements of crowdsourcing, social media, and peer-reviewed science for educational purposes. Though it's free, it's not nonprofit. The site is part of a plan by Nature Publishing Group, which has been publishing scientific journals for 140 years, to extend its reach to the college-aged crowd.</p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/07/scitable_mixes.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/07/scitable_mixes.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Damian Joseph</dc:creator>
	<category>Social Networking</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:15:31 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>Disney Crowdsources Its Own Company</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I know what you're asking: "How can you crowdsource your own company?" Well, in this case I'm referring to the fact that once a year, Disney <a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ric=DIS">(DIS)</a> puts out a call for product ideas to its entire consumer products division of 12,532 employees, which includes Fashion & Home, Toys & Electronics, Food, Health & Beauty, Stationery and Publishing. That means sales, communications, and other non-inventing divisions get to participate. It's what they call the "Big Idears" contest. For the first time, one of these ideas is coming to the mass market... </p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/disney_crowdsou.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/disney_crowdsou.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Damian Joseph</dc:creator>
	<category>Most Innovative Companies</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:41:22 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>Coca-Cola Flexes Its Design Chops on New Machines</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Coca-Cola</strong>'s <a href="http://bx.businessweek.com/coca-cola/news/">(KO)</a> Director of Industrial Design Vince Voron just finished up his talk with <strong><a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ric=SAPE.O">Sapient</a></strong>’s Director of Program Management Michael Leonard at the <em>Forrester’s Customer Experience Forum</em> in New York. In the speech, “How Coca-Cola is Integrating Brand Equities, Industrial Design, and Marketing To Gain Competitive Advantage in the Marketplace,” Voron talked about how the two companies worked together on new Coca-Cola vending machines, fountains, and coolers to enhance customer experience.</p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/coca-cola_flexe.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/coca-cola_flexe.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Damian Joseph</dc:creator>
	<category>Design</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:47:09 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>Virgin America: Social Media Replaces Advertising</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>C. David Cush is the president and ceo of <strong><a href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=10878429">Virgin America</a></strong>. I caught his keynote speech this morning at <em>Forrester’s Customer Experience Forum</em> in New York City. During, “A Good Airline Experience is Not an Oxymoron,” Cush talked about how good design, a pleasant workplace for employees, and technology are all driving the company's business.</p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/virgin_america.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/virgin_america.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Damian Joseph</dc:creator>
	<category>Social Media</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:28:03 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>A Data Site, Panjiva,  for U.S. Importers</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest blog by Venessa Wong, who joined BusinessWeek's Innovation+Design team in June.</em></p>

<p>Data, packaged usefully and cleverly, can have enormous utility and appeal. Nate Silver proved this when his political Web site <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/">fivethirtyeight.com</a> gained a following with its stats-based projections and analysis during the 2008 presidential election.  </p>

<p>In the supply chain world, a geek-chic startup called <a href="http://panjiva.com/">Panjiva </a>is crunching numbers for a business purpose—to evaluate suppliers worldwide. Sitting in an airy studio office in the Chelsea section of Manhattan, CEO Josh Green, 31, explains that supplier databases such as <a href="http://Alibaba.com">Alibaba.com</a> already exist but none takes objective data to evaluate and rate companies exporting to the U.S. Scoring can add perspective to previously overlooked or underutilized information—and make it suddenly irresistible to consumers. <br />
 </p>

<p>"Every data source was underused," he says. "U.S. Customs was a great data source but underused because it was so messy.” </p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/data_packaged_u.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/data_packaged_u.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Michael Arndt</dc:creator>
	<category>Technology</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:51:56 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>Microsoft CEO Ballmer&apos;s Do-Over Wish: Search</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Steve Ballmer isn't Edith Piaf after all: He does have regrets. The chief executive of <a href="http://bx.businessweek.com/microsoft/">Microsoft</a> says he wishes his company had been much swifter in developing a search engine. "If I could have one do-over," he says, "I would say start sooner on search."</p>

<p>Ballmer was in Chicago on June 18 for back-to-back speeches before two business groups. At the second event, before the Executives Club of Chicago, he talked about the recession and innovation. (More on that in a moment.) He gave a plug for <a href="http://bx.businessweek.com/microsoft-bing/">Bing</a>, Microsoft's new search engine, which my colleague, Peter Burrows, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2009/06/the_marketing_o.html">blogged</a> about recently. And he took a few questions from the audience that numbered 1,500-plus. That's when he turned rueful.</p>

<p>Ballmer said he and his predecessor at Microsoft, Bill Gates, used to keep a list of 10 biggest mistakes they had made. They'd look at it and rib each other by asking: "Can you believe that we spent $2 million building blah-blah-blah?"  <br />
</p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/microsoft_ceo_b.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/microsoft_ceo_b.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Michael Arndt</dc:creator>
	<category>Technology</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:20:49 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>&quot;I Hate People&quot;: A New Workplace Mantra?</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan Littman is the co-author of two very well-respected books on creativity and business--<em>The Art of Innovation </em>(co-written with IDEO's Tom Kelley) and <em>The Ten Faces of Innovation</em> (again co-written with Kelley), among other titles. Marc Hershon is a branding expert who worked at Lexicon, the agency that created such ultra-catchy product names as "BlackBerry." They're former high-school classmates, and compliment each other like Yin and Yang, both sartorially and in conversation. Littman wears sleek, chic black and arty glasses; Hershon wears a retro hat and bowling shirt. They laugh a lot, together and at each other. Yet their new book might scare some readers off, as it's called <em>I Hate People: Kick Loose from the Overbearing and Underhanded Jerks at Work and Get What You Want Out of Your Job</em>.</p>

<p>I met with the affable duo this week to talk about the book. It is both a self-help manual for people hoping to not only keep their jobs during the recession, but also possibly advance, as well as a taxonomy of office workers for managers, to help them make better staffing and team-building decisions. But it also is about innovation. Maybe not direct product innovation, but workplace and staffing innovation, as well as personal time-management innovation. Which of course can help lead people toward more inventive ideas.</p>

<p>And I couldn't resist meeting Littman and asking him about the relationship between <em>The Ten Faces of Innovation</em>, which spelled out the ten types of people you want to have on your team (Experimenters; Collaborators), and <em>I Hate People</em>, which lists the ten types you don't (Liar Liars; Stop Signs). I wanted to also sit down with Hershon, because who wouldn't want to see how the mind of someone who helped come up with the winning "BlackBerry" brand works?</p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/i_hate_people_a.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/i_hate_people_a.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Reena Jana</dc:creator>
	<category>Books</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:05:22 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>GE Announces Loans for Electronic Medical Records</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>GE Healthcare today launched Stimulus Simplicity, a new financing and product-certification program that will offer zero percent interest loans to physicians’ offices, hospitals, clinics, and other organizations. The concept is to help them cover investments in electronic medical records (EMRs). It’s the first concrete offering in the GE’s much-publicized “healthyimagination” initative, a $6 billion investment the company is making into creating low-cost, easily accessible healthcare products and services. The company will offer $100 million in loans.</p>

<p>A lack of capital to invest in new EMR systems is widely cited on physicians' blogs and online message boards as the main barrier for doctors’ and smaller hospitals’ adoption of digital records. While the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provides for federal stimulus funds to help pay for EMR systems, this money won’t be available until 2011. GE’s Stimulus Simplicity offering is meant to bridge the gap. For those who qualify for the loans, which are being offered via GE Capital, no interest will be due until 2012.</p>

<p> “When speaking to our customers, we heard loud and clear from physicians’ practices and also hospitals directly that there is a crunch on capital,” says Vishal Wanchoo, president and CEO of GE Healthcare IT. “This was the fastest we’ve ever moved on this scale [to create a new offering]. It only took a couple of months to organize and launch. But we wanted to do what our customers wanted.”</p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/ge_announces_lo.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/ge_announces_lo.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Reena Jana</dc:creator>
	<category>Healthcare Innovation</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:35:05 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>How to build an innovation culture</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>How to embed innovation in an organization must be one of the most discussed, little agreed-upon topics of our time. This week, it was the topic of a panel event at the <a href="http://i2i.xprize.org/program">Incentive 2 Innovate</a> conference, held at the United Nations and organized by Peter Diamandis and his <a href="http://www.xprize.org/">X-Prize crew</a>. Chaired by <a href="http://www.xprize.org/">InnoCentive</a>'s Dwayne Spradlin, the heavyweight panel featured Neil Blakeseley, VP of Strategy Marketing and Propositions at British Telecom, former Halliburton CEO John W Gibson, Cisco SVP for Emerging Technologies, Marthin de Beer and author and former Cisco-er, Judy Estrin.</p>

<p>In my opinion, Gibson, now CEO at <a href="http://www.pdgm.com">Paradigm</a>, put his finger firmly on the issue at hand. "I've fired nearly everyone, rehired and had exactly the same company," he said. In other words, fostering innovation is about the way you do business as much as who does your business for you. Recreate the same uncreative processes and you'll have the same uncreative business. </p>

<p>There were no "aha", breakthrough moments of clarity here. Instead, conference attendees came up with some perfectly reasonable suggestions of encouraging cross-department collaboration or creating internal networks for ideas. What came out loud and clear is that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to this critical issue. </p>

<p>I caught up with Spradlin after the panel to discuss the topic further and talk about Spradlin's own pithy assessment, that "culture eats strategy for lunch." <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/mediacenter/qt/podcasts/innovation/iotw_spradlin_0610.mp3">Listen to the podcast here</a> (with apologies for the sound quality -- I thought sneaking outside of the UN to find a quiet spot was a brilliant idea... until the planes started whizzing overhead.)</p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/how_to_build_an.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/how_to_build_an.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Helen Walters</dc:creator>
	<category>Innovation</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:50:49 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>Why Private Companies Are More Innovative</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest blog by Venessa Wong, who joined BusinessWeek's Innovation+Design team in June.</em></p>

<p>Do privately held companies have an edge when it comes to long-term innovation? At least some of them seem to. Recently, Al Gore—former Vice-President and Senator and now Nobel Prize-winning environmental evangelist—declared S.C. Johnson & Son one of the most sustainable companies in the world.</p>

<p>I caught up with H. Fisk Johnson III, chairman and chief executive of the Racine (Wis.)-based company behind brands such as Ziplock, Pledge, Windex, and Glade, after Gore spoke at the Cornell Global Forum on Sustainable Enterprise in New York on June 3, to hear what makes his company such a standout. Full disclosure: <a href="http://www.cornellglobalforum.org/">The event </a>was sponsored by the Johnson School of Management at Cornell University, which was named in 1984 after its Johnson family benefactors. Fisk Johnson is also an alum, with five degrees including a 1986 PhD in physics.</p>

<p>(To hear Johnson in his own words, click <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jt7UJShNtfU&amp;feature=channel_page">here</a>.)</p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/why_private_com.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/why_private_com.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Michael Arndt</dc:creator>
	<category>Innovation</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:07:57 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title> The Doctor&apos;s Office -- Obsolete?</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Certainly not yet, but today online healthcare reached a milestone with the announcement that American Well -- a start-up whose technology allows patients and doctors to connect live in realtime via two-way Web video, chat or telephone -- is partnering with OptumHealth, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group that serves 60 million customers across the US. </p>

<p>Regional Blue Cross Blue Shield companies in Hawaii and Minnesotta already offer their customers online care using American Well's technology, but the OptumHealth partnership marks the first nationwide online service. </p>

<p>A recent Gartner Predicts report estimated that "by 2013, 25 percent of patient encounters in North America, Western Europe, and Asia/Pacific that could be conducted virtually, will be." The response of OptumHealth's consumers to the online offering will be an interesting reality check to that prediciton. </p>

<p>Will patients feel comfortable meeting with their doctor via Web video? Are they happy to trade the intimacy of the exam room for the convenience of a virtual visit? And how will the technology-mediated interaction change the patient/doctor relationship? We'll soon find out. </p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/_the_doctors_of.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/_the_doctors_of.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Jessie Scanlon</dc:creator>
	<category>Healthcare Innovation</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:05:54 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>McKinsey on Public-sector Innovation: Forthcoming Report</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>When researching a recent story on government innovation (here's a <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/may2009/id20090527_483943.htm?chan=innovation_innovation+%2B+design_top+stories">link</a>), I spoke with Stephen Corbett, a McKinsey partner in the consulting firm's Toronto office who heads their Operations Practice for the Americas. Corbett spoke about recent trends, and also tipped me off to a forthcoming publication called <em>McKinsey on Government</em>, a report on  on productivity and operations in the public sector. It will be available later this month.</p>

<p>Corbett previewed some research from the report. I asked him about success stories of government innovation and he mentioned Sweden, which shaved 11% of of its budgets after a major governmental budget crisis in the mid-90s. They did this by re-thinking "overall structuring and management," Corbett says. He also points to the U.K., which he says saved more than 26 billion British pounds annually after re-evaluating its operational costs in 2004. The Canadian goverment merged over 70 different services, from different agencies. "The streamlining of that flow saved 400 million Canadian dollars annually," Corbett says.</p>

<p>He says countries are using the concept of lean operations, borrowed from Toyota, and applying it to defense logistics, taxes, immigration, and security clearances. The use of a new process adapted from industry certainly is innovation.</p>

<p>But he cautions that it isn't easy to translate other nations' inventive processes to the U.S. or even across European or North American boundaries. Still, there could be some lessons learned.</p>

<p>For more, keep your eye out for <em>McKinsey on Government</em>. <br />
</p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/mckinsey_on_pub.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/06/mckinsey_on_pub.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Reena Jana</dc:creator>
	<category>Government Innovation</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:37:41 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>Knoll&apos;s New &quot;Generation&quot; Chair: Stylish Engineering and Comfort</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>The Generation by Knoll chair, which will debut at the NeoCon World’s Trade Fair in Chicago in mid-June, is as comfortable an office seat as it is eye-catching. I’ve been trying it out for a couple of weeks. Duing those weeks, though, I went away on business. When I was away, some of my colleagues came by my office and tried it out. This was evidenced by the different height of the chair when I returned. And they confessed.</p>

<p><img alt="met_firecracker_alum_04 copy 2.jpg" src="http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/met_firecracker_alum_04%20copy%202.jpg" width="336" height="448" /></p>

<p><br />
As you can see from the picture, the chair probably doesn’t look a lot like many of the furnishings you might have in your workspace today. The back looks more like a plastic web or netting, reminiscent of the mesh found in hip sneakers than the rigid, screen-like back of the iconic Aeron chair (which I normally sit in). And the webby back conforms and moves with your body. Unlike many previous office chairs designed before the mid-2000s, which were made for one type of work only—sitting straight and forward, looking at a computer screen and typing or talking on the phone—this chair allows you to lean toward a collaborator to listen more easily to what she has to say, or to sit sideways to engage with, say, someone you’re mentoring.</p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/05/the_new_generat.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/05/the_new_generat.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Reena Jana</dc:creator>
	<category>Design</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:18:30 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>Five Questions for Intuit CEO Brad Smith</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="intuit.jpg" src="http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/intuit.jpg" width="341" height="336" /></p>

<p>Intuit's CEO and President Brad Smith will be visiting BusinessWeek's New York headquarters on June 3. What questions do you have for him? The company posted strong 3rd quarter results last week. Smith has been Intuit's leader since January of last year (he'd been at the company five years, and helmed each of Intuit's major businesses in that time). Since assuming the corporation's top spot, he has been focusing on small business products, worldwide growth, and tapping customers for inventive ideas. We're looking forward to your questions. <strong>UPDATE: Please post your questions for Brad Smith on our new <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/blogs/five_questions/">Five Questions For</a> blog.</strong></p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/05/five_questions_10.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/05/five_questions_10.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Reena Jana</dc:creator>
	<category>Five Questions For...</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:46:13 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>	
	<title>Is Cornell Starting a Design Institute?</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Last month, I moderated a panel on socially responsible business innovation at Cornell's Johnson School of Management. While at Cornell, I heard buzz about a possible "Cornell Design Institute" that would branch various schools at the university to offer design thinking courses for B-school students. Jeffrey Gangemi (a former BusinessWeek colleague, and Charles Lo, the panel's organizers and two 2009 Cornell MBA graduates, just informed me that Cornell will expand its design courses at the Johnson School next year. </p>

<p>This past academic year (2008-09), Cornell offered a class called Creative Design for Affordability, taught by Professor Alan McAdams and championed by both Gangemi and Lo. Professor McAdams kindly gave me a copy of the reading packet to peruse, which included case studies from companies such as Kodak and IDEO, on how to iterate low-cost products for the world's masses. Next year, the class will be offered in two forms: one a big-think course that tackles theories and ideas, and another that focuses on hands-on creation of products.</p>

<p>If this sounds like a B-school that's taking a cue from Stanford's D-school, well, you're right. The D-school's approach of bridging business and design curricula was definitely an inspiration. While two courses doesn't really signify a full-on D-school-like initiative, it does illustrate growing student and faculty interest in cross-disciplinary, design-thinking classes for tomorrow's managers. Cornell's focus on design for the world's poor might also give the budding program a way to distinguish itself among other B-schools also following Stanford's lead.</p>]]></description>
	<link>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/05/cornell_startin.html</link>
	<guid>http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/05/cornell_startin.html</guid>
	<dc:creator>Reena Jana</dc:creator>
	<category>Design Thinking</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:02:20 -0500</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>