Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.
+1 212 318 2000
Europe, Middle East, & Africa
+44 20 7330 7500
+65 6212 1000
Posted by: Helen Walters on April 01, 2010
We just published a collection of articles on the state of play within open source design and innovation. It’s an interesting bunch of pieces, with op eds from the likes of Red Hat CEO, Jim Whitehurst, who makes the case that Toyota should open source its cars’ software systems, and San José State innovation and entrepreneurship professor Joel West, who explains precisely why many big companies find collaboration and sharing control so challenging.
How business can really channel the power of a crowd in a useful manner has been a topic that’s occupied smart minds for some years now. It’s interesting to observe the evolution of the discussion and watch as businesses, with their myriad existing internal processes and cultures, figure out what might feasibly work for them. Unilever, for instance, commissioned a London-based “co-creation” firm to bring together a bunch of potential consumers to work on new product ideas. The results weren’t quick: discussions about a new men’s fragrance started back in July 2008. Twist, the eventual product, hit the market in late 2009. But in this piece by Venessa Wong, “Co-Creation: Not Just Another Focus Group”, Unilever marketing insights group category director, David Cousino makes it clear that in this day and age, customer engagement needs to be about way more than just paying lipservice to the idea of the existence of consumers.
Many designers have balked at crowdsourcing and the idea of open source design, concerned that its principles strike at the core of everything they hold dear. (“The barbarians are at the gate!”) I understand the concern, but railing at a situation reminds me of the Kevin the Teenager character immortalized by British comedian Harry Enfield, who would huff and puff at how life was so unfair. Just as adolescents come to terms with the fact that life sometimes is unfair and that there are smarter tactics for dealing with that reality than pitching a fit, so too must professionals look to evolve, acknowledge the shifted playing field, and figure out how to work it to their advantage. As Roland Harwood and David Simoes-Brown, co-founders of the new British open innovation agency 100%Open put it in their piece “Thinking About Open Design”, “the very real challenges and barriers to the adoption of a more open approach to design and innovation should not hide the emergence of a set of tools and techniques that are showing how these tactics can create new and better value.”
The conversation is by no means over. For now, I hope you enjoy the pieces in the report. Let me know what you think.
What comes next? The BusinessWeek Innovation and Design team of Michael Arndt and Helen Walters chronicle new tools for creativity and collaboration, innovation case studies in both the corporate and social sectors, and the new ideas that have the power to change the way things have always been done.