For Ole Scheeren, the lead architect of the controversial new China Central Television (CCTV) headquarters in Beijing, the "eureka" moment came during a site visit in April, 2002. Touring the abandoned motorcycle factories that occupied the land, just east of the Forbidden City, he caught sight of an old billboard that read, "Adjust during development. Develop during adjustment."
"This became the prophecy for the period and the motto of the entire project," recalls Scheeren, speaking by phone from OMA's offices in Rotterdam, where he has convened to update Rem Koolhaas and his four other partners on the project's progress (which can be seen in a show at MoMA in New York City, running from November 15 through February 26, 2007).
CCTV represents the biggest, most ambitious project undertaken by OMA to date. With its 5 billion RMB (around $636 million) budget, the project nearly tripled everything the firm had built in the previous 25 years. It also represented the chance for OMA to make its mark on the fast-evolving Asian landscape, where marquee-name architects have been swarming in recent years.
The responsibility for this was placed on the shoulders of Scheeren, the 35-year-old partner who had previously been responsible for the Prada Epicenters in Los Angeles and New York, and who moved to set up the OMA office in Beijing.
It hasn't been an entirely smooth ride. From the moment OMA was awarded the contract, criticisms were leveled against the design, and many were skeptical that the building could or would ever be built. Rumors that the building would be shelved altogether have been persistent, as have suggestions that the reality of building in the "Wild West" of China would lead to serious structural problems down the line.
"The project has been intense," Scheeren acknowledges. "CCTV was the first project we undertook in China, so we had to get to know the country and the client through research and investigation." And, he adds with dry understatement, their proposal was pretty extreme. "The engineering of the building is quite complex. Five years earlier, the building wouldn't have been possible, as the computational tools used in its design weren't sophisticated enough at that time.
This presented a problem for both the design team and the Chinese authorities—how could they evaluate a building that essentially broke all codes? In the end, analysis and approval was granted by a panel of 13 structural engineers.
All huge buildings present huge problems and dilemmas for their creators. In China, however, Western architecture companies face additional political and cultural issues, which require them to appreciate and be sensitive to the ideas, thoughts, and culture of a people whose lives and whose system of government have changed immeasurably within the past century alone. They also must acknowledge and appreciate their own biases and rationales.
"China is a country with a long, complex history and an ambivalent recent past," says Scheeren. "It's also a country in the process of radical transformation, which has declared a true commitment to that transformation. It has the ability to deal with radicalism without regret, while there's a huge amount of sentimentality within European and Western culture. We carry real cultural baggage. A fifth of the world lives in China. It has the fastest growing economy in the world. Architecture can play a role here. It can be one of the prime engines in building the country."
As such, the proposed design for CCTV eschewed potentially patronizing "Asian" motifs or designs. Initially working only with Koolhaas and three other architects, Scheeren proposed a building which would forge a new type of structure, appropriate for the flourishing new culture. The building would also stand out on the horizon, on the day it opened and into the future. City planners predict that a forest of over 300 skyscrapers will emerge in Beijing in the next 12 years.