My colleague and chief economist of Business Week, Mike Mandel, has a provocative piece out saying that the promise of innovation in the US has not been met over the past decade—and is a main reason for the current financial and economic crisis. This is a must read article.
Boiled down, Mike argues that most of the major innovations of the pasts decade has not lived up their potential as economic generators. He lists technological breakthroughs in biotech, cancer treatments, cloning, fuel cells, gene therapy, new drugs, miniaturized silicon-based machines, satellite-based internet, speech recognition and human tissue growing. All were promising in 1998. All failed to live up to their promise. Or did they?
Economists and policy-makers tend to confuse invention with innovation. Innovations are significant changes that add value to people and organizations. Breakthroughs in science and technology per se do make for innovative changes in society. So it is not the failure of innovation over the past decade that is the problem but the failure of technological and scientific breakthroughs to become innovations that is the issue.
So why? My answer that engineers and scientists often forget the social aspect of invention. They come up with new things in labs but do not link them to the needs and desires of people. So they stagnate in labs, waiting for someone to understand the culture, to tie the breakthroughs to society. Go to any period of great technological and scientific change, such as the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and you'll find a one, two, even three decade-long pause between invention and innovation. Scientists are often clueless on how to apply their inventions and it takes years for that application to be found, often by those who aren't the inventors.
Paul Saffo of Stanford recently gave a speech where he said that if you want to find the best opportunities for economic growth and investment coming out of the current recession, look to technological and scientific breakthroughs made two decades ago. Bio-tech and social media are two of his picks.
So Mike, I think I agree with you, kind of. We've had a terrific period of invention over the past decade. But we need to bring in the designers and their empathetic, user-centric, anthropological approaches to innovation to turn them into growth generators.
I hope the policy-makers in Wsshington understand this.
What do you think about his conversation?
Want to stop talking about innovation and learn how to make it work for you? Bruce Nussbaum takes you deep into the latest thinking about innovation and design with daily scoops, provocative perspectives and case studies. Nussbaum is at the center of a global conversation on the growing discipline of innovation and the deepening field of design thinking. Read him to discover what social networking works—and what doesn’t. Discover where service innovation is going and how experience design is shaping up. Learn which schools are graduating the most creative talent and which consulting firms are the hottest. And get his take on what the smartest companies are doing in the U.S., Asia and Europe, far ahead of the pack.