The Web Video Scorecard As Of Right Now

Posted by: Jon Fine on April 12, 2007

So:

On March 22 NBC Universal and News Corp leapfrog (make that try to leapfrog) YouTube by announcing a complex partnership for a video Web site and syndication service.

CBS decides not to join in as an equity partner.

Three weeks later—that would be today—CBS announces Web video partnerships with (deep breath) AOL, Microsoft, CNET Networks, Comcast, Joost, Bebo, Brightcove, Netvibes, Sling Media and Veoh.

Advantage: CBS. Ubiquity is a better play than throwing in your lot with a service that demanded exclusivity in exchange for said equity stake. (Note that CBS is mulling using NewTube for distribution. I’d be surprised if they didn’t, ultimately. )

Interesting sideline, as pointed out by NewTeeVee’s Liz Gannes:

CBS appears to have gotten with the Viacom anti-YouTube program, and there’s no mention of the site or its parent Google, not even in a shout-out to existing partners: “CBS has previously entered into existing and ongoing content distribution arrangements with Yahoo!, Apple iTunes, Microsoft’s Xbox, Amazon UnBox and many others.” (Guess YouTube qualifies as one of the “many others.”)

Agree on the observation, but not on the interpretation. CBS has been remarkably friendlier with YouTube than Viacom—indeed, friendlier with YouTube than most other media companies, period—down to the March Madness deal they just did. (And seemed pretty happy with, by the way.)

I can’t help but wonder if a deal between CBS and YouTube similar to the others announced today looms as well, no matter what another company affiliated with Sumner Redstone might think of it.

And by the way: Where’s Yahoo in all of this?

Reader Comments

solomonrex

April 13, 2007 10:22 AM

I wonder if Yahoo is going to be lost in all this. They haven't done enough of their own programming, and they can't attract new programming, apparently. Both AOL and Yahoo seem adrift a bit, lost in the maze of their old complicated websites and businesses.

Yahoo gave up on geocities, then myspace basically comes out of nowhere (a geocities clone with social features), so Yahoo comes up with another brand - 360. They couldn't axes/renovate geocities and they couldn't buy Myspace. Why?

I thought AOL had a cool "TV Land"-like video portal, but their website is so bad I gave up on it. They grabbed a great sports blogger - Jason Whitlock- but he doesn't have a home page or a normal blog. The execution is terrible.

Yahoo might have the 1st party/3rd party problem that MS had with the original Xbox. They released their own sports games, but EA didn't want to join the xbox until they stopped making them. So maybe viacom et al are going to avoid Yahoo as long as they appear to have rival ambitions with their own video content and entertainment czar as CEO. Maybe they don't want to help Yahoo! become the powerhouse that destroys them.

Post a comment

 

About

The media world continues to shapeshift as new forms arise and old assumptions erode. On this blog, Bloomberg Businessweek will provide sharp analysis and timely reports on the transformation of this constantly changing terrain.

Categories

 

BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!