Bloomberg Anywhere Remote Login Bloomberg Terminal Demo Request


Connecting decision makers to a dynamic network of information, people and ideas, Bloomberg quickly and accurately delivers business and financial information, news and insight around the world.


Financial Products

Enterprise Products


Customer Support

  • Americas

    +1 212 318 2000

  • Europe, Middle East, & Africa

    +44 20 7330 7500

  • Asia Pacific

    +65 6212 1000


Industry Products

Media Services

Follow Us

Bloomberg Customers

More on Tribune and the Los Angeles Times

Posted by: Jon Fine on September 29, 2006

It’s pretty to think of a Los Angeles Times liberated from Tribune and in the hands of kindlier local ownership. But there are numerous real-world factors that argue against this ever happening. A few of them are outlined in my latest BusinessWeek column here.

Some more thoughts:

1. There is ample documentation, some of which you can find in this book and some more in this book, that strongly indicate that no journalist should aspire to being owned by David Geffen. (As noted elsewhere on this blog, Jack Shafer very enjoyably pointed out the folly of hanging hopes on the Times’ other billionaires in waiting, Eli Broad and Ron Burkle.)

2. It’s untenable long-term to expect a paper as complicated as the Los Angeles Times to produce the 20% profit margins that Tribune’s come to expect. But it’s also untenable long-term to expect some kind soul or foundation to run a for-profit newspaper as a break-even or marginally-profitable business. (The sheer size of the Times and its pricetag makes a foundation ownership approach impossible, though that’s what’s in place at Harper’s magazine and the St. Petersburg Times.) Mass-media properties have to stand up on their own, and not lean unduly on someone’s largesse, if they aspire to, uh, sticking around.

3. Most depressingly: No party in this fight has put forth any kind of ideas regarding what a Los Angeles Times substantially reinvented for the 21st Century might look like. (I suspect top editors and business-side people at the paper itself—as opposed to within Tribune Tower—would argue that they can’t owing to constant struggles to make numbers and constant pressures to draw up contingency plans if they don’t. Under current circumstances it’s hard to argue with them.)

But someone, somewhere will have to figure out how to reinvent it. How would you?

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Reader Comments

Greg Michael

October 5, 2006 01:28 PM

Fine comments on media!

I believe that The LA Times management is too editorial-centric. They really can't seem to tackle issues envolving numbers, trends, headcount and advertising. The LA Times must start making a national online effort and promote their major industries online with movie, TV and pop music venues, Silicon Valley, sports cars, Rt. One, beaches, Wine Country and politics. They should pay bloggers as much as they do their adult "paper boys" who throw some 300 newspapers on a route for $800 a month. Check out my blog on new media at

Post a comment



The media, entertainment and marketing worlds continue to shapeshift on a near-daily basis, as new forms arise and old assumptions erode. Where is it all going? No one really knows. But on this blog BusinessWeek’s media writers Tom Lowry and Ron Grover promise to provide ample helpings of scoop, provocation, and sharp analysis as they track and annotate this constantly changing terrain.



BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!