Eight years after the ruble crisis sent shock waves across Eastern Europe's financial sector, banks in the region are bigger, stronger, better regulated, more profitable and more competitive than ever.
This, more than any other development in the economic sphere, signals that market forces have established a firm footing in former command economies. Most of these "transition" countries are booming, with bank lending a big factor in current economic growth rates that range from over 6% in Russia and Serbia to 5.7% in Ukraine and 5.5% in Poland.
No longer constrained within a socialist mono-bank culture, the sector now boasts a diverse range of institutions. They provide finance to aspiring entrepreneurs, to larger firms seeking to boost their competitiveness, and to households looking for better lifestyles. Banks still dominate, but the financial sector is broadening thanks to stock markets bolstered by tougher disclosure rules, pension funds promoting long-term savings, and private equity. Corporate governance and transparency have improved.
While much work still has to be done, improvements in the institutional environment, privatizations, and the entry by foreign banks into the market all helped drive change, particularly as nations from Latvia to Poland to the Czech Republic prepared to enter the European Union (EU) in 2004.
Now, banks in the transition zone enjoy returns on assets and on equity well above the EU average, thanks to booming economies and reforms that have given banks greater security in lending. Lending in the region increased on average by 20% in 2005, underscoring the role of banking in the transformation of the broader economy. Deposits are rising in line with domestic confidence in economic stability and in the financial system.
EU accession countries have made the most progress in reforming their banking systems, but indicators in the just released Transition Report for 2006 also show upgrades over the last year for Russia, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan. Tajikistan and Uzbekistan have improved as well, albeit from lower levels. Banks in most of the region now enjoy better legal protection, courts are better at enforcing laws, and banking supervision and regulation have become more effective.
It's all a far cry from the 1998 ruble devaluation and debt default, which led to bank and business failures and the evaporation of savings in Russia and beyond. While still vulnerable, the region's financial institutions are much better equipped to weather a downturn in the global appetite for emerging market risk.
The ratio of bad debts to total loans has improved across the region. In the EU accession countries, it is now fast approaching the eurozone average of 3.4%. In the Commonwealth of Independent States, the ratio has tumbled from 18.5% in 2002 to 6.5% in 2005. And in the Balkans, the ratio is falling but remains high at 9.5%.
The presence of foreign-owned banks—mainly Swedish, Austrian, and Italian, but also Citibank (C) and GE Capital (GE)—which control between 60% and 90% of bank assets in most countries, has helped to increase the availability of credit, boosted competition, and also encouraged the widespread adoption of better banking technology and management practices.
However, the dominant role of foreign banks has raised some worries about the possible knock-on effect in transition countries of a financial crisis in the domestic economy of one of the parent banks. The experience of the 1997 Asian financial crisis is instructive: Japanese banks reduced their lending across Asia in reaction to an initial crisis in Thailand.