From aviation to gas, the sparring between the Ambani brothers shows no signs of fading. In fact, June 18 will mark the third anniversary of the family agreement between the two brothers. That agreement ended a bitter, year-long fight in India's first business family and appeared to pave the way for an amicable resolution of all issues. Three years later, very little seems to have changed. The bitterness continues and the disputes are endless.
While the controversy surrounding the MTN deal is the latest in the unabated acrimony, it is apparent that neither Mukesh nor Anil is in any perceptible hurry to smoke the peace pipe. Right from the time the demerger was announced in June 2005, the siblings have been at it. Interestingly, the issues that have become contentious have been varied and not necessarily restricted to their existing lines of businesses.
By all counts, the most controversial and contentious issue is the sale of gas by Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries (RIL) from its Krishna Godavari basin to fuel brother Anil's Reliance Energy's proposed 7,450 MW power plant in Dadri, UP. What makes the gas issue critical is that it goes to the core of the dispute: to the demerger agreement between the two entities.
The gas is important for Reliance Energy to fuel its 7,450 MW power project proposed to be set up at cost of over $8 billion. According to the agreement, Reliance Energy will require 40 mmscmd (million metric standard cubic metres per day) of gas at a cost of $2.34 per mmbtu (million metric British thermal unit) for a period of 17 years. This will be broadly broken up into 28 mmscmd initially, with another 12 mmscmd accruing in the event of RIL's contract with NTPC not going through.
As things stand, RIL has objected to the terms and conditions (which include price, duration and quantity) of this gas sales agreement. It has refused to supply gas to ADAG citing government disapproval of the price. ADAG has gone to court seeking directions to force RIL into complying with its portion of the agreement.
The fate of RIL's 80 mmscmd of gas production from the KG basin and that of Dadri power plant rest on the court case. In an interim order last year, the Bombay High Court has restrained RIL from selling the gas to any third party with the purpose of protecting the interests of R-ADAG.
The gas supply issue finds a place in the June 2005 family agreement between the brothers. The agreement was signed by Mukesh and Anil in their respective capacities as chairman and vice chairman of RIL in the merged Reliance entity. This broadly stated that both the groups were to enter into suitable arrangements as per a scheme called the 'demerger scheme', which was approved by a large number of RIL shareholders and the Bombay High Court in December 2005.
The basis of several disputes lies in the agreements reached between the siblings in early 2006: the gas sales purchase agreement (GSPA), the non-competition agreement (NCA) and the trademark management agreement (TMA). These were signed between RIL and what the documents describe as the 'resulting' companies of the Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (ADAG). Even at that time ADAG had reacted sharply to the agreements signed by RIL and the four ADAG companies. ADAG claims that both sets of entities were controlled by elder brother Mukesh and the agreements were tantamount to Mukesh signing agreements with himself. These agreements have now become the root cause of all disputes between the brothers. Sources close to Mukesh claims that Anil is being selective and that the younger brother often used the same agreements to thwart the elder brother's plans.
The NCA was in the limelight when Anil Ambani wrote to the Maharashtra chief minister in 2007 claiming that RIL could not set up power projects. He maintained that this business was exclusively reserved for ADAG. This was when the Mukesh Ambani group proposed to set up power projects in its proposed special economic zones (SEZs) in Haryana, Gujarat and Maharashtra.
Copyright © 2008 Times Internet Limited. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service