BusinessWeek Logo

Intuit and the Dangers of Hubris

Posted by: Steve Hamm on October 08

When finance software maker Intuit announced a deal on Sept. 14 to pay $170 million for Web 2.0 phenom Mint.com, a lot of people asked the obvious question: Why did Intuit have to buy Mint? Why didn’t it think of doing what Mint does before Mint did it? After all, Intuit is known for its dedication to finding out what consumers want to do and making it easy for them. How could such a customer-obsessed company have let another outfit leapfrog it?

I put this question today to Brad Smith, Intuit’s CEO, when he dropped in for a visit. His answer: It’s generational. Intuit understands and caters to an older group of people. In the 1980s and 90s it helped them make the leap from balancing paper checkbooks and visiting the neighborhood bank to using Quicken on their PC and banking online. But Intuit failed to decipher the wishes of the Web 2.0 generation.

It took 27-year-old Mint.com founder Aaron Patzer to see that other young people wanted to keep track of all of the threads of their financial lives simply, in one place, and figure out smart ways to save money. They also wanted the service for free. So it was he, not Intuit, that put together the hottest new spot for personal finance management. Mint.com analyzes consumers’ finances and suggests ways that they could do better, then channels them them to financial services providers who can help them out. Those companies pay for leads and new customers steered to them by Mint.com.

Smith says Patzer and Mint.com served as a wake-up call to Intuit. The message: “I tell our employees that hubris is the worst thing of all. Over-confidence blinds us into believing we have all the answers. We got caught.” Now, as part of Intuit’s quarterly reviews, its executives study all of the start ups in the finance space and see if somebody’s doing something they should do. Then they perform a simple calculus. They ask themselves what’s the best way to get a 15% to 20% return on their investment over a three- to five-year period, build new software internally or buy a company that already has it?

In spite of coming late to the Web 2.0 party, Intuit is performing relatively well during the Great Recession, and it’s poised to do even better when economic activity increases. It’s busy creating dozens of new cloud-computing-type services—many of them for mobile phones. One thing’s for sure: It won’t likely be bushwacked by another Mint.com any time soon.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.businessweek.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/

Reader Comments

Sudhir

October 12, 2009 08:03 AM

Its an important lesson for all companies. Most impressive that Intuit and their CEO are openly admitting that they didnt catch the trend. Not too many companies do that.

anil

October 14, 2009 08:33 PM

I'm an Intuit employee and would like to respond to Neeta. The QuickBooks accounting program has provided credit card payment processing since 2002. The just released 2010 version of QuickBooks provides check payment processing.

I do agree that a lack of technical leadership is displayed when it is necessary to acquire short-lived web based companies at the same time that many long term employees are being layed off.

starney

October 30, 2009 08:28 PM

http://www.tracked.com/person/brad_smith_348697/compensation

Post a comment

 

About

The Race for Perfect Book

Innovation is happening everywhere these days. Companies operate without borders to find the best talent and the best ideas wherever they may be. Meanwhile, new business models are arising that just might make it possible to turn large swaths of this contentious world into something approximating a true global village. Tune in for Senior Writer Steve Hamm's dispatches from the intersection of globalization, innovation, and leadership.

The Race for Perfect is available at Barnes&Noble, Amazon, and Borders. Selected chapters are available online. bangalore tiger book

Bangalore Tiger is available at Amazon and Barnes & Noble

BW Mall - Sponsored Links