BusinessWeek Logo

Lessons in HR Management from Palin's Selection

Posted by: Dan Beucke on September 02

By Keith Epstein
Corporate boards and HR specialists everywhere might learn something from the Republicans’ unfolding (Democrats hope, unraveling) experience in choosing a little-known, virtually unexamined candidate for the vice presidential ticket. The New York Times, Anchorage Daily News and others are reporting the rather skimpy background checking by John McCain’s campaign – and very brief pre-announcement encounter by the two – that might have turned up disclosures now making their way onto television and the blogosphere.

How well do you really know that executive you just interviewed and offered a job with a handshake? You can trust those who vouched for the job candidate, but is that enough? How much investigation is enough investigation? How do you balance too much asking around about a CEO or other prospective job candidate – without risking premature disclosure? Hopefully better than the McCain campaign appears to have known Sarah Palin.

McCain appears to have relied on some heavy Googling and the word of some important conservative Christians. Vetters didn’t even bother to ask many obvious acquaintances among top Alaska legislators and associates at a state regulatory agency of the energy industry. Some now are even questioning what this might say about McCain’s leadership abilities. Will the big bang from McCain’s choice of the Barracuda cause a boomerang effect back on the Republicans’ presumptive boss?

For now, of course, Republicans – and conservatives – appear to be backing the choice. And indeed, the revelations receiving the most attention, involving a daughter’s out-of-wedlock pregnancy and Sarah Palin’s own decision to have a baby with Down syndrome, seem to be underscoring rather than undermining McCain’s pro-life stance. But GOP hands from Anchorage to their encampment in Minnesota are now beginning to ask other questions. Among them: Is there some other distracting revelation to come? Will there be more news diverting attention from the campaign? Already, the party is dealing with a focus on her 17-year-old daughter’s pregnancy, her membership in a fringe party that backed independence for Alaska, her possible involvement in the firing of a state trooper who happened to be locked in a bitter custody battle with her sister, and the unusual amount of earmarks steered to her small town.

Other questions: Was the vetting done sufficiently? NBC reports that as of Friday when McCain announced his choice, no one had even visited Wasilla, Alaska, where Palin was mayor before becoming Alaska’s governor, to look through the archives of the local newspaper, the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman. Reports NBC: “Aides were sent to pour over that newspaper after Palin was picked.” The Frontiersman’s Sept. 2 headline: “Under the Microscope.” In the Alaska town of 7,200 it’s come as something of a shock; but for the experienced political hands at McCain’s side, that could have been expected.

Reader Comments

maxsmart

September 2, 2008 12:17 PM

Well I think they checked Palin and her family out quite well. Well enough to figure out how to use her daughter for the anti-abortion agenda. Well enough to encourage teen pregnancies because there is no good sex education allowed in school and information on birth control measures, and enough to work to tell all women what and when they can do all kinds of things just because of a small group of religious zealots trying to run our lives out of their family bibles. When someone like the red rover builds a certain reputation, their comes a time when nothing can be taken at face value anymore. Lets face it that time for the Bush administration and the republican party came years ago. It is the logic of someone crying wolf too many times.
What is pathetic is that someone would offer up their own daughter to the media in this way and work to spread this kind of problem to families all across the country for purely ideological reasons.

Tom Paine

September 2, 2008 12:43 PM

I think that when you conduct an interview you also should know what the candidate is supposed to do for you. Putting aside Gov. Palin's uncertainty over what it is Vice Presidents actually do, Sen. McCain's team should have asked themselves how this choice strengthened their executive team. President Bush has always had VP Cheney contributing to major policy decisions; President Clinton used VP Gore the same way but VP Quayle was pretty well invisible in the elder Bush's Administration.

JT

September 2, 2008 12:52 PM

Well, you certainly are biased. I bet you won't give Obama and Biden the same scrutiny.

Squeezebox

September 2, 2008 12:57 PM

Coming from a party infamous for mudslinging, McCain should have known better. He should have learned from the presidential race of sixteen years ago when H. Ross Perot was driven out of politics. Politicians who throw stones shouldn't live in glass houses.

VS

September 2, 2008 03:09 PM

Lieberman was on the ticket until 10 days ago and he was replaced last minute with Palin because McCain was afraid republicans were not going to want Lieberman.

MCCAIN SHOWS HE IS A real MAVRICK AND GOES AGAINST HIS PARTY lol!!!!

Ron

September 2, 2008 06:11 PM

Someone who was a vocal member of the radical, anti-American, secessionist Alaska Independence Party should be instantly disqualified from any role close to President of the United States.

This is an insult from McCain to all Americans. If he makes decisions this hastily about something this important, so early on, god knows what other awful judgment calls he'll make as president.

smitthy

September 3, 2008 12:27 AM

The Religious Right has bought the party. As CBSnews.com headlined a moment ago, this is Palin's campaign.

Grumpy

September 3, 2008 07:42 PM

I'm a bit taken back by Pallin's use of the word "choice" in describing her decision to bring her DS diagnosed baby to term. And by the laurels of her backers in applauding her "choice." As well as her saying she is proud of her daughter for "choosing" to keep her baby. Certainly, this could not have been a "choice" for someone who wishes to deny all women the right to make choices in such circumstances.

McCain has neither the wit nor the temperament to be POTUS. And now this is who he would put a 72 yr old heartbeat away from being CiC?

When did the GOP stop being the party of fiscal responsibility and become a theological support group? Sigh, for the first time in my 60 years, I see no reason to vote. Straight to Hades in a handbag whichever way it goes.

JOE FETZ

September 3, 2008 08:54 PM

The political process in America is totally broken. We continually get marginal candidates for political offices. I can't believe the choices we get for President. It is much tougher getting ahead in Corporate America. You have to be highly educated and bust your butt for 10-15 years to get ahead. In politics you can get ahead overnite. Palin wouldn't get very far in Corporate America. It's ridiculous.

Americano

September 4, 2008 03:21 PM

Well Grumpy, you lived up to your name. It's not the woman's choice, it's the baby's RIGHT. Given to us, as babies, by GOD. Sorry you don't like her "choice" of vocabulary.

That being said, this is the second Republican ticket in a row where I wish the candidates were flipped. Oh well, now the "choice" is Socialism. The only difference is how fast you want it.

Post a comment

 

Election 2008

Washington Bureau Chief Jane Sasseen and other BusinessWeek writers cover the run-up to the Nov. 4 presidential election, paying close attention to how the candidates will handle issues such as housing, the economy, unemployment, and immigration.

BW Mall - Sponsored Links


Magazine

Current Issue

BusinessWeek Cover