BusinessWeek Logo

Selective Tuition Hikes Make Sense

Colleges are justified in imposing differential tuition—charging higher fees for certain courses of study such as business that pay more. Pro or con?

Pro: Free Choices, Fair Fees

In a business venture, greater value equals greater cost. Higher education is wise to follow that model by raising the tuition for business courses, which can propel grads into better-paying careers, as well as classes in certain other subjects, such as science and engineering, that cost the school more to deliver.

The practice, known as differential tuition (BusinessWeek, 12/4/07), especially makes sense for public schools, which often need to compete with prestigious private ones. Any extra monies that public colleges charge students can go toward luring celebrated professors and updating equipment and facilities.

For some schools it’s a matter of survival. An underfunded curriculum could lead to loss of accreditation for certain public schools, leaving high school graduates with no choice but to enroll in more-expensive private ones that have accreditation. Better to raise the prices. After all, a public school with higher fees for certain majors will still cost students less than a private one would.

Upon graduation, business majors—and many of those who studied science or engineering—will be in a better position to repay student loans than grads from other fields. (Know any philosophy majors whose first job pays $85,000 a year?)

And charging more for certain courses of study is nothing new. "At the graduate-school level, tuitions at business schools and law and medical schools are much higher than than they are at undergraduate institutions because of the financial payoff there is going to be," says Ronald Ehrenberg, director of the Cornell University Higher Education Research Institute. "So now, people are sort of doing the same thing at the undergrad level."

Con: Extra Charges, Bigger Headaches

Many students enter college with the goal of sampling different courses on the path to discovering their career goals and achieving general self-enlightenment. The prospect of asking already cash-strapped parents to fork over an extra $35 per credit, as is the case at Utah State University’s Jon M. Huntsman School of Business, could easily intimidate a French major out of trying a global marketing strategy class.

Likewise, the University of Wisconsin at Madison is making undergraduate business majors ante up an extra $500 per semester. Texas A&M’s Mays Business School is considering charging students $500 more per semester as well.

Such price hikes are antithetical to the traditional mission of public schools, to offer a quality education for those who can’t afford, or don’t want to pay, private schools’ frighteningly large tuition bills.

The higher tuition and extra fees schools require can sneak up on young people who, in the whirlwind of college spending and adjusting to a new way of life, may not fully understand exactly how tuition and living expenses can add up.

The University of Oregon charges "programmatic resource fees," not just to business majors but also to students majoring in certain other subjects that require special equipment, materials, or faculty services. "I didn’t know what the fees were when I first got the bill," says Emily McLain, a University of Oregon senior who serves as student body president. "Some students were forced into taking out emergency loans because they didn’t know the total cost."

And just because a school uses the extra revenue to hire bigger-name professors doesn’t mean all students win out. Eric DeFries, a senior business major at Utah State, notes that he hasn’t taken any classes from the seven new vaunted professors at his school. "I find it a little unfair for people who don’t get a direct benefit to be paying $500 extra per semester," he says.

Opinions and conclusions expressed in the BusinessWeek.com Debate Room do not necessarily reflect the views of BusinessWeek, BusinessWeek.com, or The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Reader Comments

andrew

In many ways, universities are more difficult to run than most businesses, because they have to deliver long-term value to customers (students/alumni) while facing short-term budget constraints.

However, differential tuition is not a solution to funding.

Differential tuition works better at graduate levels, because the education is more specialized and curriculum is more focused.

Undergraduate programs are too broad for this to be fairly applied. For example, engineering is one of the highest paid bachelor's degrees, but more than 50% of a B.S. engineering curriculum is composed of liberal arts and science classes (chemistry, math, physics, social sciences, foreign language). How should the extra money be divided among departments? Is this going to give the school incentive to change its acceptance criteria for engineering schools (less stringent presumably)?

Worse yet, is this going to give schools the incentive to value classes according to the sum of money they bring in? A consequence could be schools' cutting out the classes of "lower value."

Although differential tuition at the undergrad level sounds like free-market thinking, it is really an inefficient way of setting transfer price.

sue

I agree that charging extra tuition will discourage students from trying courses in more "expensive" areas. Plus it may discourage students from less affluent families from going into fields that would allow them entrée to higher paying jobs. This in turn may perpetuate the kind of socio-economic stratification that colleges should be trying to undo.

Andy

Why not? It is a basic of supply and demand law. The universities pay their professors differently, so why not charge their students differently, too?

Puneeth Joseph

All parents need to start saving for their children's education. Better to be safe than sorry. In this competitive world, it is better to pay a high price and give a quality education to children. Or else life becomes one long struggle for your kids.

Andy

Clemson University is already charging business school majors an additional $800 per semester. Of course, this extra fee is not mentioned to potential new students. Clemson surprises the student junior year when the student has to declare his major.

Buck Scalese

Universities aren't businesses; they are nonprofit institutions. I can understand lab fees for fields such as science, engineering, and aviation, but each credit of business classes should cost the same as any other class. To do otherwise will only discourage low-income students already dependent on financial aid from taking higher-value courses. Then again, that might be the point of selective tuition, though I dearly hope not.

daniel

Being an economics grad, I must say this is totally ridiculous. Universities are out to make money, plain and simple. Ever wonder why your professor only teaches two or three classes a week but drives a Porsche? Also, the university selects the courses within the degree plan. Talk about tempting them to load everyone down with mandatory expensive classes. College is just one big scam in today's world. Please give me a massive amount of debt for the chance of a $30k cubical. Thank you sir, may I please have another?

Ric

As long as the price hike is matched with low-interest loans freely accessible to students and it improves education, do it.

Join the Debate

 

Participate More!

Please send us your ideas for new Debate Room topics. If you're an academic, association officer, or other industry expert and would like to write a Debate Room essay, send us a query. Questions? See the

BW Mall - Sponsored Links