|
 |
CONTENTS
Preface.................................................................xi
I PROLOGUE.......................................................1
II ORIGINS.........................................................25
III ANCESTORS: Jost.........................................53
IV PIONEERS: Rahel..........................................96
V ACHIEVERS: Giacomo.................................162
VI PATRIOTS: Louis.........................................200
VII DREAMERS: Arthur...................................236
VIII SURVIVORS: Ewald..................................286
IX DESCENDANTS: Michael............................339
X EPILOGUE......................................................375
Notes...................................................................395
Selected Bibliography.........................................409
Index...................................................................427
Illustrations appear between pages 210 and 211.
|
The Invisible Wall
Germans and Jews: A Personal Exploration
By W. Michael Blumenthal
Counterpoint
(C) 1998 W. Michael Blumenthal
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 1-887178-73-2
Read BW's Review of This Book
CHAPTER ONE
ORIGINS
1
If someone had asked my parents where their families came from, the
reply would have been Brandenburg or perhaps, reaching further back,
East Prussia. My mother, a touch self-conscious, might have mentioned
the province of Posen (now the Polish Poznan), making sure to add that
her family had moved to Berlin long ago, when Posen was still a part
of Prussia--and that Posen was not like Galicia. In the circle of my
parents, the distinction between longtime residents and recent
arrivals--the largely Galician Ostjuden--was important to the former
for their sense of status and identity.
More distant roots? That question would have been met with blank
stares. When I was young, many assimilated German Jews had grown
quite hazy about their remote origins. The history they remembered was
their history in Germany, beginning about where this book begins--the
last part of the seventeenth century or the early part of the
eighteenth.
But that, of course, is not the whole story. The distant past of
Germany's Jews--indeed, of all Ashkenazim--can be traced back much
further, all the way to classical times. There are some historians, in
fact, who believe that the key to understanding Germany's Jews--their
special character, who they were, and what they thought and did--lies
precisely in that faraway past. That, however, although it provides
intriguing Insights, is a subject for a book in itself and too far
removed from the scope of this one. For our purposes, a few
significant highlights and events suffice to put what came later into
appropriate perspective.
In the beginning there were no Ashkenazim or Sephardim, only a
Semitic people who came to be called Jews, named after the tribe of
Judah, the Hebrew Yahudi. There is much that is unique about the
Jews, above all, perhaps, that they have survived at all. They are,
after all, the only biblical people to have endured intact to the
present day. Given their fateful, often bloody history and their
unending trials and troubles, that in itself is little short of a
miracle. What is equally remarkable is that over much of their
recorded history, they survived as a largely dispersed people. Ever
since their Babylonian exile in the sixth century B.C.E., more Jews
have lived outside their homeland than in it.
Most of the early details are uncertain and shrouded in the mists
of the past. But we do know that well before the time of Christ there
were large, flourishing Jewish communities throughout the Middle East
and in the major Mediterranean cities. There were Jews in Babylon,
Mesopotamia, and Phoenicia, in the Persian Empire, in Egypt, along the
coast of North Africa, and later on in Greece. After the rise of the
Roman Empire, large numbers of Jews lived in Rome and throughout much
of the rest of Italy.
From the beginning, a great many were outside the homeland by force
of circumstance rather than choice. A large part of the Jewish
population had been exiled to Babylon six centuries before Christ.
Later, when Titus destroyed the Temple in 70 C.E. and again, in the
aftermath of the Bar-Kochba revolt sixty years later, as many as a
half million Jews or more are said to have been carried off to Rome as
slaves.
Yet not all who left their homeland did so involuntarily. Jews,
along with Syrians and Greeks, were among the old world's most
adventurous and enterprising travelers and traders. Some reached India
and even China, where there is evidence that the so-called Kaifeng
Jews may have first settled there not many centuries after the birth
of Christ.
The succession of Roman procurators sent to govern Palestine
imposed ruinous tax burdens on the people and drove many Jews off the
land. As a result, substantial numbers left for essentially economic
reasons in a steady flow of emigrants to Rome and other parts of the Empire.
There is no precise Information about total numbers, but we do know that it
involved many--probably in the millions, more, indeed, than the number
of Jews who remained behind, causing a contemporary of Caesar to
observe that "it is hard to find a spot in the inhabited world where
this race does not dwell or traffic."
As to their arrival in Germany, no one knows for certain when a Jew
first set foot on German soil, though there are stories claiming a
presence well before the birth of Christ. Some historians cite reports
of a Jewish presence in Roman towns and settlements near the Rhine and
Danube rivers as early as 300 B.C.E. There are tales about Jews in the
ancient city of Worms petitioning Herod to spare Jesus from
crucifixion, and of beautiful Jewish maidens among Roman legionnaires
encamped along the banks of the Rhine.
Although these are merely legends, the hypothesis of a very early
presence in Germany is not unreasonable. The Romans were the first
people from an advanced civilization to arrive there, years before
Christ, at a time when the indigenous tribes were still dressed in
little more than pelts. They came, originally invited by the Gauls, to
help repel the invasion of "barbarians" pressing in from the East.
Crossing the Alps or traveling north from the Mediterranean through
France, up the riverbeds of the Rhone, the Loire, and the Seine, they
established their towns and encampments along the great rivers--the
Rhine, Main, Mosel, and Danube. And in the wake of the Roman
legionnaires came all the others: settlers and camp followers, wives,
prostitutes, beggars, and gypsies, and of course the merchants and the
traders. Given a substantial Jewish presence in Rome and the
prevalence of Jewish traders throughout the classical world, the
supposition that Jews were among the earliest arrivals is certainly
plausible.
The first concrete evidence of a Jewish presence in Germany--locally
made terra-cotta bottle stoppers and a menorah excavated from Roman
ruins near Trier--dates back to the third century C.E. The elaborately
carved stoppers depict manikins with clearly Semitic features and seem
to make fun of such Jewish customs as circumcision, exclusiveness, and
endogamy. They also give an idea of the occupations of these early
Jewish settlers, to wit, wine-growing and the trading of slaves. But
the first really hard evidence attesting to the presence of Jews is
generally thought to be two decrees by the Roman Emperor Constantine
the Great in 324 and 331 C.E. The first of these stipulates that the
Jews of Cologne are eligible to be called to the Curia, or city
administration--thereby bestowing on some of them the dubious honor of
making them liable for Roman taxes. The later decree exempts the Chief
Rabbi from this obligation.
In the pre-Christian era, leaving aside that a good many of their
ancestors had been brought there against their will, the Jews in Rome
and throughout the Empire seem to have led tolerable and normal lives.
They were Roman citizens and enjoyed the same legal rights as all
others, with no particular restrictions placed on their freedom of
movement, their occupation, or the practice of their religion. They
were merchants, shopkeepers and traders, artisans, farmers, and
vintners, and they had their scholars and rabbis who even then
occupied a place of honor and respect among them.
Two exceptions, however, already distinguished them from others--and
both would have fateful consequences when resurrected in a later day.
For one thing, the Jews alone were liable for a special poll tax, the
Fiscus Judaicus, justified as a substitute for the ancient tax once
imposed for the support of the Temple in Jerusalem, and they were
also--on religious grounds--exempt from military service.
Already the Jews seem to have voluntarily set themselves apart,
focusing more on each other than on the outside world. Their pride in
their faith and their sense of chosen mission made them seem somewhat
haughty to others. They alone were the monotheists, passionately
committed to what they believed was the only true faith, tenaciously
determined to maintain the covenant with their God, and unalterably
convinced that steadfast adherence to their laws and prescriptions
would lead, in time, to the kingdom of God on earth.
This too would have lasting and bitter historical repercussions and
would contribute to their reputation as stiff-necked resisters, to
their "otherness" as a people with an alien culture and a sense of
superiority toward those around them.
2
What role does chance play in the history of mankind?
What if a short Jewish tentmaker from Tarsus, a man named Saul,
with crooked legs and bright blue eyes under heavy brows, had not had
a vision telling him to go out and preach to pagans and Jews that the
only way to salvation was to accept the crucified Jesus as the son of
God? If this man, the true founder of Christianity, who is today
called St. Paul, had not had his dream, would today's world be
fundamentally different?
What if Mohammed, left as an orphan in the desert, had not been
taken in by his uncle but had perished in the sandy wilderness of
Arabia at an early age? What if George Washington had been captured in
the battle of Trenton, or if the young Napoleon had died in the siege
of Toulon? Indeed, what if a young girl named Klara Plozl had never
come to be a maid in Alois Schicklgruber's household, eventually
married him and borne him a son whom all the world knows as Adolf
Hitler?
Are there fundamental forces that shape the fate of humanity
regardless of personalities and individuals? Or is it that particular
persons and events, by virtue of fortuitous circumstance, have a
determining impact on the course of human history and experience,
which in their absence might have taken a totally different turn?
These questions arise in any study of Jewish history, where the
chance appearance of key figures and seemingly random milestone events
have again and again played a fateful role in shaping the vicissitudes
of Jewish existence.
The spread of Christianity is clearly one such example, perhaps the
most dramatic one. But it is only the first in a long series of
others.
When Constantius Chlorus, known as "The Pale," who was about to
become Caesar of the Western Roman Empire, met and took as his
concubina, or morganatic mate, a certain tavern maid named Helena, it
became for the Jews another watershed. For out of their union emerged
around 275 C.E. a son named Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus,
later called Constantine the Great, who would make a momentous
decision affecting not only the course of Western culture but also the
long-term fate of the Jews.
For Constantine (as for St. Paul), it began with a dream and a
vision. When Constantine succeeded his father as Caesar of the West
in Gaul and Britain, there were other Caesars who were his rivals. As
he set out to do battle with one of his competitors, a certain
Maxentius who held sway over Rome and Africa, it appears that
somewhere near Colmar, before crossing the Alps, he and his soldiers
reported seeing a shining cross. It was, he said, in a dream that
night that he received the command of Jesus to take the cross as his
standard. Thus Constantine became the first Christian Emperor of Rome,
and when he died he was buried in the white robes of a Christian
neophyte and not, as had been customary, in the purple of a Caesar.
Constantine's conversion marks the beginning of the
Christianization of the Roman Empire with lasting--mostly baleful--consequences
for the Jews. Broad religious tolerance had prevailed
under the pagan Emperors. Now, as the pagans yielded to the new faith,
it was the Jew who stood apart. He stubbornly resisted conversion,
becoming a permanent thorn in the side of the state, a member of a
sect that the Emperor at various times called shameful, contemptible,
beastly, and perverse.
Discriminatory decrees soon followed. In 319 C.E. it was ordered
that Jews be burned for stoning a convert. Later there were other
edicts forbidding their ownership of Christian slaves or their
circumcision, the conversion of any slave to Judaism, and on pain of
death, Jewish-gentile intermarriage and the teaching of the Torah to
gentiles. Henceforth, the Jews in Rome and Italy were singled out as a
nettlesome people and progressively deprived of their equal rights.
There were repercussions in Germany also, but for the next several
centuries at least, the position of Jews remained less unfavorable
there. It was a time when the Roman Empire of the West was in decline
and the petty kingdoms of the Franks and other tribes ruled in Gaul
and on the German side of the Rhine. These were rude, crude, and
uncouth people, but since religion--a single true faith--was less of a
factor for them than in Christianized Rome, the lot of the Jew was at
first less onerous as well. Roman law, which had bestowed citizenship
on him, still pertained, and as far as is known, the Jews of Germany
seem to have lived under these tribes in relative peace and burdened
with few discriminatory restrictions. But these are the Dark Ages, and
detailed knowledge about conditions and events is scarce. However,
over the next four hundred years two separate developments with future
significance are noteworthy.
On the one hand, these are centuries when a flourishing commerce
developed among the "barbarian" West, Christianized Byzantium, and the
rising Muslim East. The nobility in Gaul and Germany greatly valued
the East's jewels and ivory and their tapestry, silk, and spices.
Exotic essences and perfumes were particularly welcome in an age not
known for its cleanliness. Noble ladies and their men liked the "Jew
smell"--the perfumes Jewish traders brought from the East, where there
was strong demand for furs and for weapons and slaves. It is the Jews
who, together with Greeks and Syrians, became the principal traders in
this commerce. Jewish ships sailed the seas between East and West,
and Jewish entrepreneurship and initiative benefited from these
conditions in a world that was difficult and lawless but also full of
opportunity and reward. The role of these Jewish seafarers and
caravaneers was greatly valued, and it has been said that to an extent
the tradition of an international Jewish network of traders and
financiers, which endured to modern times, has its earliest origins in
this period.
The second development of the period had equally far-reaching
consequences, although its impact on Jewish life in Germany would
prove less favorable. In the feudal order prevailing under the Franks
and the other tribes--Burgundians, Frisians, and Swabians--land
ownership passed to the warriors and vassals of the ruling elite.
Allegiance to these princes, dukes, and lords--and their protection--was
derived from status achieved in battle. Jews had neither military ties
nor rural roots, leaving them in a kind of no-man's land, unprotected
and with uncertain status. By the ninth century, therefore, when the
Franks had gradually converted to Christianity and come under the
influence of the Church, the Jews--without land or protection--found
themselves isolated and vulnerable, easy targets for discrimination
and abuse.
Yet for the next several centuries, the position of the Jews
actually took a turn for the better. A new, more favorable ruler
appeared on the scene: Charles the Great, or Charlemagne, as history
remembers him. Crowned King of the Franks and Emperor of the West in
768 C.E., he established a new dynasty and led a renaissance in his
Carolingian realm, the beginning of what in time became the Holy Roman
Empire.
Charlemagne was strong-willed, intelligent, and pragmatic. He
greatly expanded his kingdom, conquered the Saxons, fought and
defeated the Lombards, and led expeditions against the Arabs in
northeastern Spain. He vigorously promoted commerce, and for this he
valued the enterprise and skill of the Jews, and so he protected them
and gladly availed himself of their talents.
Charlemagne was the founder of German nationhood. As the Saxons and the
Wends came under his sway, he continued to push outward toward the east. Along
the Elbe, Saale, and Oder rivers his dynasty established scores of new
cities at Magdeburg, Halle, Merseburg, ranging as far away as Prague,
Bohemia, and Poland. Wherever he and the Carolingians went, traders
followed, and it is along these flourishing routes of commerce that
the Jews spread out and settled across Germany at key points and river
crossings that later grew into towns.
Jewish life under Charlemagne and his Carolingian successors has
some interesting parallels to the Jewish experience in the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries. Both were eras when critical turning points
with lasting consequences took place. In the later period, the Jews
emerged from the ghetto into modernity. Under the Carolingians they
first became true Europeans, the culmination of an evolutionary
process away from their oriental origins begun when their ancestors
had left the homeland many centuries earlier. Henceforth, it would be
the numerically superior Ashkenazim who would play the dominant role
in world Jewry, distinct from those in and around the homeland, and
the main carriers of a unique kind of Jewish-European culture developed
in the diaspora.
On the one hand, the enmity of the Church toward Jews--"those who
had murdered the Lord"--was already well established and reflected in
a steady stream of Church edicts aimed at containing their presence
among Christians. The conversion from paganism was recent and shallow,
and many edicts were designed to isolate Jews from Christians lest the
flock be contaminated by Jewish heresy. But there was also much
jealousy of Jewish wealth and resentment of the lost tithes from
Jewish nonbelievers. Though the discriminatory and often punitive
decrees had an ostensible theological basis, many were at least as
importantly the result of economic and financial motives.
On the other hand, the basic antagonism of the Church toward the
Jews notwithstanding, much of what was decreed was kept more in the
breach than in the observance. Charlemagne and his temporal successors
largely ignored the edicts, treated the Jews as equals in most
economic and political spheres, and allowed them to practice their
religion without any significant restraints.
In a pattern that would be repeated many times in a later day, the
Jews, though standing apart, had an important role to play in the
system: they were needed, so they were tolerated and protected,
sharing in the Carolingian renaissance and prospering under it. In
addition to their roles as traders, merchants, and artisans, they were
valued as physicians, scholars, and advisers. One of them, Isaac, is
known to have been dispatched as Charlemagne's emissary to the distant
court of the great Harun al-Rashid, returning four years later with
the Caliph of Baghdad's splendid and astonishing gift of a live
elephant, which Isaac had successfully transported in an arduous
journey from the Middle East to Charlemagne's court at Aixla-Chapelle.
Prosperity and royal protection led to a flowering of Jewish
culture, and great academies of Jewish learning flourished in many of
the larger German towns. But though life was good for them, the seeds
of trouble were already germinating beneath the surface. Here lies the
second parallel to modern German-Jewish history.
Gentile society was organized within a rigid class structure--nobles
at the top, and clerics, soldiers, craftsmen, and serfs below them.
Jews stood outside this structure and were relatively more prosperous
and educated, but as a group, they were without secure social standing
and recognized prestige. In contrast to the prevailing squalor of the
towns--general filth, stinking streets, and poor houses--they lived
among their own under conditions that were a good deal better. Within
the voluntary separation of the Judengasse, the Jew street, they kept
slaves, their houses were made of brick, their women rarely worked,
and their dress was better, even splendiferous on holidays and special
occasions. They had developed a language of their own, read books and
were more literate, and walked with pride. Under the rabbis who were
the scholars, arbiters, and judges regulating Jewish affairs, their
life was more prosperous and more ordered.
These were the ingredients for future trouble. Jews were not only
different, they were proud of it and made little secret of their
disdain for many of the prevailing temporal rules and of their refusal
to recognize any true king other than their Lord, or that the supreme
law binding on them was the Jewish law and no other.
During the era of Carolingian rule up to the eleventh century, the
Jews of Germany grew in numbers and spread out across the land. They
prospered in relative security and their culture deepened. But their
separate ways, partly forced on them and partly voluntary; their
greater wealth; and their position outside the established social
structure proved a precarious and dangerous mix in the face of the
animosity of the Church and the ignorance and jealousies of the
population around them. The time came when it would lead to tragedy
and disaster.
3
Clermont-Ferrand, in the Auvergne, is today a modern city of 150,000,
the Industrial and tourist crossroads of the massif central in
south-central France.
Clermont is an ancient Roman town, founded in the third or fourth
century C.E., long before it was joined with its twin city
Montferrand. The name means Hill of Light, but in the Jewish
literature of the Middle Ages it was often called Har Ophel, or Hill
of Darkness. For it is here that an important visitor came at the end
of the eleventh century C.E. to make a speech that would have a lasting
impact on history. For the Jews, the speech was--like the Babylonian
exile or the Christianization of the Romans--a major turning point
ending their better days under the Carolingians and ushering in events
that decimated their communities and forever worsened the Jewish
position in the gentile world and the attitudes of Jews and gentiles
toward each other.
Pope Urban II, a Frenchman of noble birth, who had been Cardinal
Bishop of Ostia, came to Clermont in 1095, seven years after his
elevation to the papal throne. Erudite, eloquent, and handsome, Urban
was an important ecclesiastical reformer who held office during a
period of severe crisis and change in Christian affairs. His energies
were focused on strengthening the position of the Church and
establishing clearer rules and laws defining its position vis-a-vis
Christian society and its temporal rulers. His aim was to expand
ecclesiastical influence and supremacy in the affairs of the Christian
world, and that was the purpose of his trip. It was with this in mind
that he arrived to speak at Clermont on November 27, 1095.
The Pope wanted to stir the enthusiasm and religious fervor of the
believers and rally them closer to the bosom of the Church. To do so,
like any astute politician, he chose a cause and a rallying cry that
he knew would be well received among the faithful--nothing less than a
call for a great crusade and holy war to liberate the Holy Land from
the Muslims and free Jerusalem from the grip of the Infidel, in the
name of Christ.
The Christians of the East had for some time been asking for help
against the encroachment of the Muslims, who had extended their sway
throughout the Mediterranean and across North Africa as far west as
Spain. More recently, Christian pilgrims to the Holy Places had reported
intolerable indignities at the hands of the infidels. But gradually
the Muslims had been losing ground, so the moment seemed opportune to call for
the great Crusade and to urge the knights to strike a decisive blow in the
long-standing Christian-Muslim struggle.
The battle cry was deus volt--God wills it. A Pope calling for war
might seem strange to us today. But in Urban's day it was not. In a
time of spiritual awakening, Popes did not disfavor war as a means of
promoting their cause, blessing the battle flags of the knights and promising
them spiritual rewards in this life and in the next.
It is unlikely that the Pope anticipated the enormous power of the
forces he set in motion. For the Church and the rulers, the Crusade
was a convenient diversion from many internal problems. For the impoverished
knights, taking the vows of the Crusader meant adventure and the
chance to escape their debts. And for the others--the unofficial bands
of common people and rabble that followed them, there was the
opportunity for food, loot, and excitement in an otherwise drab and
dismal life.
A council of bishops began the planning on the very next day, and
the Pope and others continued to carry the message throughout France
and beyond. Within months, the first Crusaders, led by Peter the
Hermit of Amiens, set out toward Constantinople and the Holy Land,
arriving in Cologne in April, on what became a major route for the Crusaders--up
the Rhine and down the Danube to Hungary and on to the East. But what was
intended as an orderly movement of armed crusading knights soon turned
into an undisciplined horde, as assorted bullies, adventurers, and
local riffraff joined the throng, intent more on loot and pillage than
on religious salvation. Two groups in the population became their
particular targets: women and Jews.
In an age when women were relatively defenseless, the rabble that followed
the knights had little compunction about their abuse and rape along the
way--and certainly not as regards the female Muslim prisoners taken later on.
Nor did their enemies hesitate to respond in kind, as described
somewhat salaciously by a Saracen writer of the period: "How many
well-guarded women were profaned ... and pretty things put to the test,
and virgins deflowered and proud women dishonored and lovely women's
red lips kissed."
But if women were a frequent target, the Jews became one even more
so, for they were not only equally defenseless but also a rich mark for
loot. Though some Crusaders like Peter had taken vows not to kill and
could be bribed to pass by the Jewish areas in peace, others were
considerably less squeamish and restrained.
Two factors, with their roots in the earlier past, contributed to
the doom of the Jews. For centuries the Church had agitated against
them and accused them of every imaginable sacrilege, including the
murder of the son of God. Why, the people now asked, do battle with
the infidel in the faraway East, without first avenging the death of
Jesus on his murderers closer to home? As the Abbot of Cluny put it:
"What is the good of going to the end of the world ... when we permit
among us other infidels who are a thousand times more guilty toward
Christ ... ?" Thus the seeds sown by centuries of animosity and
inflammatory rhetoric now became the religious justification for Jew
killing.
The second factor making the Jews a ready target, however, lay
outside religious prejudice and the greed of the masses. The often
self-imposed Jewish isolation now contributed greatly to their
downfall. Living among their own in the separate, more prosperous
Jewish quarters, well before the time when the authorities enforced
their segregation, coupled with their ill-concealed distaste of the
habits and ways of the gentiles, made them stand out as a readily
identifiable and conveniently positioned minority ready for slaughter.
The First Crusade began in 1095, and before the movement had run
its course over the next two centuries there were a total of seven
others. Again and again, as the waves rolled over Jewish communities
by the Rhine and Danube rivers, there was mayhem and murder,
though the first three Crusades were by far the worst. It was as if
the first killing had set a precedent
and permanently opened the floodgates of anti-Jewish excesses among
the people. From then on, for hundreds of years to come, the pogroms,
the expulsions followed by recalls and renewed exiling, and the
general degradation of the Jews never ceased for long.
It is during the two first centuries of disaster and decimation
following 1096 that the attitudes of gentiles and Jews toward each
other would be most deeply and permanently influenced and shaped. The
life of the Jew among the Christians would never again be the same.
His designation as an outcast has its origins in this period,
affecting his character and his position as a hated alien, and marking
him for centuries as the scapegoat for every calamity and disaster in
the world around him.
4
The orgy of killing of the First Crusade set these calamitous events
in motion. A holocaust, as this surely was, is rarely predicted in
advance, and the victims are usually the last ones to see it coming.
Perhaps that is because, by its very nature, a disaster of such epic
proportions defies the imagination and lies beyond human grasp before
the event.
In our own time, many German Jews did not see the signs of their
impending doom; until virtually the last moment they simply could not
envisage what was in store for them. As the Crusaders advanced on them
nine centuries earlier, Germany's Jews faced a similar disaster of
impending wholesale decimation and they were equally unable to
recognize the storm signals ahead, though later Jewish chronicles have
preserved a full account of the events.
Early warnings from their French cousins that the roving bands of
Christian Soldiers of the Cross and their followers meant serious
trouble were disregarded. What had happened in France didn't seem
relevant to their own situation. They had lived relatively unharmed
among the Christians for a long time. As would happen in the twentieth
century, they trusted their neighbors and their government. Germany
was different, they thought.
They were soon disabused of this idea. It was during Passover, on
May 3, 1096, when the first horde of Crusaders under Emicho, Count of
Leiningen, descended on the Jewish quarter of Speyer, looting and
forcibly baptizing some, while murdering eleven others. At Worms and
Mainz, over the next two weeks, It was Infinitely worse, and before
the rampage ended there, eight hundred Jews had died. "God wills it,"
the Crusaders cried, and the stunned Jews almost seemed to accept the
battle cry as their own. Some sought refuge with the bishop, others
tried to buy off their attackers, but rarely did they defend
themselves, and when the mob approached, rather than risk forcible
baptism, they preferred to die by their own hand, an act they called
Kidush ha Shem, blessing the Name:
They let themselves be killed and blessed the Name of the Lord; they
offered their necks so that their head be cut off in the name of their
Creator; some also laid hand on themselves. Thus they fulfilled the
word of the prophet--"The mother is on her children and the father has
fallen on his sons." Thus the one butchered his brother, the other his kin, his
wife and his children; also the bridegroom his bride, gentlewomen their
darling children. All accepted wholeheartedly the heavenly judgment, offering
their souls to their Creator, crying "Hear, O Israel..." The enemy
stripped them, and dragged them about and none was left except a few
who were baptized by force.
The atrocities at Worms lasted two weeks, but when Emicho and his
mob moved on to Mainz at the end of May, the bloodletting was even
worse, and before it was finished well over a thousand Jews had died
there, many by their own hand. Virtually the entire community was
wiped out in an orgy of killing and mass suicide over the next several
days:
The first to be encountered by the enemy ... were the most devout,
among them Reb Izchak ben R. Moshe, a great leader. They had refused
to flee into (the bishop's) inner chambers merely to buy themselves
another hour of life. Rather, they sat there, lovingly accepting the
judgment of heaven, wrapped in their prayer garments and prepared to
fulfill the will of their Creator. The enemy smothered them with
stones and arrows and cut them down with their swords. And when those
in the inner chambers saw how the enemy had overwhelmed them, they
called out "... it is best to sacrifice our lives...." And the women
butchered their sons and daughters, and then
themselves. And many men took heart and likewise slaughtered their
wives, children and servants."
Those prepared to submit to baptism might sometimes be spared, but
only a few were willing to save themselves in this way. Incredibly,
even those who had been forcibly baptized were so devastated that they
preferred death, thus to expiate the dishonor of having to live among
the uncircumcised Christians. In one such dramatic instance, described
in the later chronicles of Jewish survivors, Mar Izchak and Mar Uri,
two rabbis, set fire to the synagogue and chose self-immolation for
themselves and their families rather than to bear the disgrace. First
they killed their kin, and then: "He went to the House of Prayer ...
lit fires at every corner and door, and prayed amidst the fire to the
Lord in a strong and beseeching voice."
In town after town, and in every village where Jews lived, the mobs
looted and killed. In Cologne, many Jews chose death by throwing
themselves into the Rhine. Whole communities were wiped out in the
surrounding villages at Xanten, Mors, Altenahr, and Kerpen. Farther
south, at Regensburg, the Crusaders drove the entire Jewish community
into the Danube and forcibly baptized them. Before it was over and the
Crusaders had moved on, more than 12,000 German Jews had met their
death. For the survivors, the only consolation was the news that
Emicho and his cohorts had themselves been killed by the Hungarians,
who apparently took a dim view of their marauding ways.
The First Crusade's period of slaughter finally ended in 1103 when Henry
IV allowed the forcibly baptized Jews to return to their faith,
decreeing his Landfriede, a peace bestowing immunity on "clerics,
women, nuns, peasants, merchants, travelers, fishermen, hunters and
Jews."
Slowly, the survivors crept back to rebuild their homes, and for a
generation the peace held. But the bloodletting was not over; this was
merely the beginning of a long period of suffering and death. In the
twelfth century, the Second and Third Crusades began with similar
massacres of Jews. Even though the king and occasionally clerics like
Bernard of Clairvaux inveighed against the Jew killing, they were
rarely successful, and the murder continued with never-ending
outbursts of violence against Jewish communities at Boppard, Speyer,
Halle, Erfurt, Frankfurt, and elsewhere throughout Germany.
For the Jews, the lasting significance of the Crusades lay not only in
the terrible toll exacted on them. The disaster also left deep and
permanent scars on both sides. Jews everywhere now were outcasts and
fair game, subjects of denigration and derision forever exposed to
official and popular discrimination and mistreatment. In the Jewish
mind there remained etched deeply into the collective psyche a sense
of helplessness, full of agony and self-blame. In time this resigned
fatalism would serve as the basis for making a virtue out of their
pariah status and enforced isolation.
Early in the thirteenth century, the Emperor proclaimed the Jews as
his servi camarae, his personal property, protected by him but
exploitable as an asset of the Crown and subject to his whim. The
Church, though officially opposing outright slaughter, continued to
add to the Jewish troubles. The Third Lateran Council in 1179 had
inveighed against Christian money-lending, leaving the Jews, who had
been excluded from most other occupations, as the principal source of
credit--hated usurers in a dishonored profession, with negative
implications for many years to come.
But it was at the Fourth Council, called by Pope Innocent III in
1215, that the greatest number of discriminatory rules and
restrictions against the Jews were added in what has been called the
high-water mark of medieval anti-Jewish legislation. Innocent was
an unyielding enemy of the Jews; he called them "Sons of the
Crucifiers" and wrote that they were condemned to be the living
witnesses to their sins: "It is pleasing to God that they should be
suppressed by the servitude they earned when they raised sacrilegious
hands against Him."
Henceforth Jews were to be officially separated from
Christians--thus foreshadowing the fateful practice of segregating them
in ghettos. They could no longer hold public office, have sexual
intercourse with Christians, or employ Christian servants. Living
apart, they were ordered to wear the distinctive Jew badge, dress with
a peaked hat, and pay heavy taxes on their property. Once converted,
they were strictly forbidden to return to their faith. Moreover, the
Council's propagation of the Doctrine of Transubstantiation--the Host
as the living body of Christ--added Host desecration as yet another
pretext for Jewish persecution to all the other false accusations of
Jewish thirst for Christian blood, ritual murder, and child killing at
Passover.
Bloody outrages against Jews continued throughout the thirteenth
and fourteenth centuries, with rarely a time when somewhere in Germany
Jews were not being set upon, massacred, or expelled. In 1243, the
first recorded charge of Host desecration led to the devastation of
many Jewish communities. A worse slaughter, with the same
justification, occurred in Frankfurt
a few years later. In 1286, many Jews died in Munich after being
accused of drinking the blood of Christian children during their
Passover rites, and in 1298 a poor knight with the curious name of
Rindfleisch (beef meat), alleging a ritual murder in the town of
Rottingen, instigated the massacre of thousands of Jews throughout
Germany. During the Armleder riots, which continued for two years
beginning in 1336, bands of roving rabble armed with pitchforks who
called themselves Jew batterers (Judenschlager), roamed through
Franconia, Swabia, and Alsace, wreaking havoc on dozens of Jewish
communities including that of Mulhouse, which was almost totally wiped
out.
The height of Jewish suffering, however, was reached during the
terrible years of the Black Death from 1347 to 1352, when all of
Europe was in the grip of fear and anguish over the ravages of a dread
disease that killed as many as twenty-five million, a quarter to a
third of the entire population.
It was an event that one historian has described as "the most
terrible physical calamity in historic times." The medieval world
was no stranger to the scourge of diseases like leprosy, scurvy, and
influenza, for which no one knew a cure. But this pestilence that
descended on Europe was different. It killed vast numbers
indiscriminately and rapidly--usually in three or four days. No one was
safe--neither rich nor poor, soldier nor servant, priest nor layman,
peasant nor city dweller. Places where crowding and the concentration
of people were greatest, such as monasteries, were particularly hard
hit. Before it was over, of 375 bishops alive in 1348, 207 had died,
also 25 of 64 archbishops and 9 of 28 cardinals.
We now know that the cause was Pasteurella pestis, bubonic,
septicemic, and pneumonic bacilli probably imported by oriental rats
on ships docking at Marseilles and other Mediterranean ports. From
there the disease spread through France, England, and Germany and
across the rest of Europe, reaching Russia in 1351. No one understood
what was happening or knew what to do, and the resulting helplessness
and mass hysteria in the face of imminent death for all is hard to
describe.
The rich blamed the poor, and the poor the rich. Soothsayers,
quacks, and charlatans had a field day. Astrologers looked to the
stars and concluded that it was all because of an unhappy conjunction
of Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars. The Church explained it as divine
punishment for a sinful world. Yet all this was to no avail, and none
of the traditional cures--purging, bloodletting, potions, or vinegar
treatments--was effective. New remedies such as fasting, dieting,
purifying the air by fire, and fumigation with incense worked no
better, nor did more outlandish ideas, such as those of the Medical
Faculty of Paris, which opined that baths and sexual intercourse were
particularly dangerous and likely to have fatal results.
It was in this climate of fear and terror that the people were
gripped by a form of mass neurosis and madness that led to wild
excesses in behavior. Some turned to mindless superstitious
religiosity. Throngs of half-naked flagellants wandered through the
streets beating themselves in the hope of divine forgiveness. Others
resorted to orgies and licentiousness, and the breakdown in normal
restraints led to a pervasive lawlessness exceeding all previous
bounds. And so it was not long, amid the turmoil and the derangement,
before the masses turned on society's outcasts--first the lepers and
then, with a bloody vengeance, on the Jews.
The retribution wreaked on Germany's Jews was terrible. It began
when the rumor gained currency that the deaths were not divine
retribution at all but a pestis manufacta, a pestilence deliberately
caused by the Jews to punish Christians for their past outrages
against them. Put to the torture, some Jews had been made to say that
they indeed had been at fault: "because you Christians have destroyed
so many Jews," a tortured victim had shouted at Breisgau; and at the
castle of Chillon, near Lake Geneva, a similar confession had been
extracted.
Soon the news spread of elaborate Jewish plots to poison wells with
internal potions, and magic brews. Even though the king and the Church
tried to protect them, and the Pope himself issued a bull absolving
Jews of responsibility and blaming the devil, nothing could stop the
crazed rabble. Throughout Germany, sixty large and 150 smaller
communities were wiped out. Six thousand Jews are believed to have
died in Mainz alone. At Strassburg, on St. Bartholomew's Night, August
23-24, the entire community was burned at the stake, and the same
occurred at Frankfurt and Cologne, where more than 2,000 died in the
flames of a mass pyre."' At Nordhausen, the Jews asked for time to
prepare themselves, and died by their own hand in mass self-immolation.
The plague killed Jews and Christians alike, but for the former it became
the occasion for yet another in the seemingly endless series of
massacres and disasters that had stretched over more than two
centuries. Of the many thriving communities that had existed in
Germany prior to the Crusades, not many were left when the fourteenth
century drew to a close.
5
As the next century dawned, much had changed for the Jews of Germany,
and none of it was for the better. The Age of Death had lasted for
several hundred years. Tens of thousands had perished; others had
escaped eastward through Bohemia and Moravia to Poland and the Slavic
areas. For the rest, life had become difficult and precarious and
these remnants of what had once been flourishing communities now lived
scattered across the land, subject to severe restrictions.
Throughout Germany, as elsewhere, the rules of the compulsory
ghetto, first promulgated during the Third Lateran Council, were
coming into force with increasing severity. In Frankfurt, as of 1462,
110 Jewish survivors lived segregated in the Judengasse, behind
portals guarded by a Christian gatekeeper and tightly shut at ten
o'clock each night. Punitive taxes were the order of the day, the
threat of pogroms was ever present and expulsions were frequent--at
Cologne in 1424, Speyer in 1435, Augsburg in 1439, and later in Mainz
and Ulm as well. One place would banish them, while another would
decide it needed them and readmit them, usually at a high price.
Sometimes, after a few years, the very town that had expelled its Jews
"for eternity" would again call them back to fill the void in money
lending and trading.
In Swabia all Jews were imprisoned, their property confiscated, to
be released only upon the cancellation of all debts owed to them.
In Brandenburg the back and forth of bloody punishment, expulsion, and
return was particularly frequent. No sooner had some Jews been allowed
back, when a short generation later yet another disaster descended on
them. In 1510, for example, a potter named Paul Fromm was apprehended
in the theft of a gilded Host from a village church, which he had
allegedly sold to the Jews for their sacrilegious purposes.
What followed is typical of the day. Thirty-five Jews were arrested
and tortured repeatedly until they finally "confessed" their guilt. On
the day of their punishment, a great spectacle was organized for the
amusement of the masses. On Friday, a feast day, the town nobles, wise
men, scholars, and theologians gathered in the market place, seated
high up on a three-tiered wooden stage. Below them sat judges,
scribes, and other officials, all avidly watched by the spectators.
Slowly and solemnly, the condemned were led to the market square,
Fromm at the head of the procession, followed by the Jews in their
long caftans and white peaked hats. Fromm was tied to a rack, an iron
chain around his neck, and exhibited to the people. Finally, he was
singed ten times with hot irons and eventually burned to death. The
Jews, three at a time, were similarly killed, but not until a rabbi
had said a prayer while the condemned sang praise to their creator.
two Jews who had converted to Christianity were favored with the
privilege of a mere beheading, rather than the more painful death on
the pyre.
Yet even during this somber period Germany was never totally
without Jews, although the numbers now were small--no more than a few
thousand at most. If not for the great trek eastward of those escaping
the reign of terror, perhaps the Jews of Ashkenaz might not have
survived at all.
A few Jews had gone to the eastern areas in earlier times, but now
it was Poland and Lithuania to which they flocked in large numbers.
Poland lay in ruins from the devastation of Tartar invaders and a
series of friendly rulers was eager to have the immigrants' help in
the rebuilding. In 1264, Boleslav the Pious was the first to issue a
Charter of Protection for them. In the next century, Casimir the Great
was particularly hospitable, encouraged, it is said, by his beautiful
Jewish mistress.
Under their liberal policies Jews were granted broad rights,
allowed to live where they wanted and to travel freely. They settled
widely in towns and villages throughout Poland, became an important
force in revitalizing trade and commerce, and worked as artisans and
financial agents, estate managers, and "tax farmers," interposed
between the people and the nobility. Allowed a large measure of self-government
and autonomy, they developed a rich communal life, religion
and scholarship flourished, and their numbers increased greatly. At
the beginning of the fourteenth century only a few thousand Jews lived
in Poland. By 1500, their number had risen to 50,000, increasing again
tenfold to half a million within another century
and a half. The birth rate was exceptionally high, so that in
time--even when conditions had become much less favorable for
them--Poland and Lithuania were home to well over a million Jews.
This eastward migration and the extraordinarily rapid growth of a
large Jewish population in Poland, Lithuania, and parts of western
Russia, is of great importance. It is in large part due to this that
Western Jews survived, and it is this pool of people that became a
major source for the rebirth of German Jewry through a re-emigration
westward after the seventeenth century.
From the early days of their arrival, Polish Jews had tended to
cluster in their own areas and to reconstitute their inward-looking
religious and cultural life. Their language remained the Yiddish
mixture of middle high German with Hebrew and Latin words. Enforced
ghetto segregation or widespread restrictions on where they could live
were not a significant issue, except later in Krakow and in a few
larger cities. Real ghetto culture, therefore, has its true origins
not here but in the West, Germany included. Its impact on Jewish
traditions and habits, and on Jewish psychology, is critical for
understanding future developments and deserves brief mention.
Strictly enforced segregation of Jews behind ghetto walls was first
implemented in Spain and Portugal, and in Venice after 1516--hence the
Italian name geto, or iron foundry, its site in that city. In time,
the practice, with some local variation, spread elsewhere, and nowhere
was it accompanied by harsher and more comprehensive rules than in
Germany.
Typically, the ghetto or Judenstadt was confined to one or more
narrow streets, twelve feet wide, in the worst part of town. With no
chance of enlargement as populations grew, houses tended to be high,
often meeting at the roofs, since only vertical expansion was
possible. Overcrowding, squalor, and unsanitary conditions were
endemic and sunlight was sparse. Moreover, since the Jews could not
own real estate, they were perennially exposed to the gouging of
Christian landlords. Access was through a single gate, locked inside
and out. No Christian was allowed in at night or on major holidays
like Easter, when the inhabitants were strictly forbidden outside the
ghetto walls.
The rules regulating what the Jews could and could not do were
endless. The tax burden was oppressive. They could not ride in a
carriage or employ Christians. Distinctive dress, with the Jew badge,
was required at all times. Shops outside the ghetto were forbidden.
Jews were barred from handicrafts and the liberal professions. In some
instances, to control their numbers, only the firstborn was allowed to
marry, and occasionally all inhabitants had to submit to forced Church
services--and to strict controls meant to prevent them from blocking
their ears.
What remained for the Jews was trading in secondhand goods,
primarily old clothes. Without shops, they became peddlers, and their
traditional role as money lenders triggered pawnbroking and dealing in
gold, jewelry, and precious stones. Overall, life was degrading,
stultifying, and unhealthy and led to a general impoverishment of the
population.
And yet, paradoxically, it was these very restrictions and the
Jews' isolation that also created a varied, often rich social life and
became the key to future Jewish culture. To survive within the ghetto
walls, the Jews established their own microcosm of the outside world
and their own rules of behavior, social morality, and traditions,
some of which would prevail into modernity.
The Chief Rabbi and his council administered temporal as well as
religious affairs. Adversity and closeness spawned self-help
organizations for charity and hospitality to travelers, for learning,
and for education. Jews developed their own mail system and rules to
discourage outbidding on the rents paid to Christian landlords.
Community organization was tight, with a common bake house, dance
hall, and public bath--and the synagogue at the center. Jews were
thrown on themselves; their tradition of domesticity and the
importance of Jewish family life have roots in ghetto culture.
To be sure, life was harsh, and in time no less than one in ten
Jews was reduced to beggary. But even under the limiting conditions of
the ghetto, the Jews created an environment of relative peace,
serenity, and even of some joy, retaining their pride and making a
virtue of their isolation.
6
It was fundamental changes in the world around them which first gave
rise to changed circumstances and new opportunities for those Jews who
had survived in Germany.
Until the sixteenth century, the feudal state was under the sway of
one ruler and a single Church. Government and business were based on
moral concepts that required submission to Church teachings, and these
rigidly excluded the Jews. But now a new order of individual states
evolved, each pursuing its quest of political and economic advantage
through mercantilist concepts of self-sufficiency in manufacture and
trade. In this type of early capitalism, making money became a prime
goal, and poverty was no longer regarded as a virtue. In this era of
court absolutism, the local prince, duke, or petty ruler replaced the
Church as the all-powerful arbiter of human affairs. The primary
purpose of the state was to serve his needs and political
ambitions--and that required an expanding economy and the financial
resources to sustain it. For this, more population was needed, capital
had to be marshalled, industries organized, and new patterns of trade
and commerce developed.
In this context the Jewish problem took on a different and more
secular dimension. Religious strictures were now less important. Jews
became useful for what they could contribute to the goals of the
state. As it happened, their particular talents and historical
experience proved highly relevant to what was required.
The recent schism in the Church also had a considerable and, on
balance, positive impact on the position of the Jews. Not that the
Protestant religion was any more favorably disposed toward them than
Catholics, or that Protestant leaders like Calvin or Luther were any
friendlier than the Popes of Rome. True, Martin Luther had at first
come to their defense, partly because it was politically expedient in
his fight with Rome, and partly in the hope of converting them through
kindness. But as political circumstances changed, and attracting Jews
to Christianity proved no easier for him than for Catholics, he turned
violently against them. In time his hatred for Jews and the harshness
of his prescriptions for dealing with them if anything exceeded that
of the Church in Rome. In fact, eventually his shrill and intemperate
anti-Jewish rhetoric became so violent that it served, some four
hundred years later, as a favorite source for quotation by the Nazis
in justifying their anti-Semitic measures.
What mattered is that in the fight between Protestants and
Catholics, the Jew was essentially a bystander and the Jewish problem
a decidedly secondary issue. In Germany, moreover, there was yet
another factor with far-reaching consequences for the Jewish minority.
The Thirty Years' War, pitting Catholic areas against Protestant
areas, raged across its territory, devastating and depopulating the
land and leading eventually to the creation of well over two hundred
de facto separate political entities, territories and city states tied
together only in theory but in fact independent to make their own
treaties and to pursue their separate political goals.
Jews had stood apart from the war's controversies. Expelled from
the major urban centers, except for the few city ghettos, and
scattered across the countryside under the protection of local nobles,
they had eked out a meager living as money lenders, pawnbrokers, and
peddlers. They had suffered along with the rest of the population,
paid the heavy taxes, and endured the hardships. But in the ghettos
and behind the shield of their local masters, they had nevertheless
been somewhat more secure than others. In fact, the conflict had
created opportunities for them to supply the protagonists while the
war raged--and to serve the rulers when it finally came to an end.
One important development of the period, which profoundly shaped
the evolution of modern Jewish life in Germany, is that the war and
its aftermath gave rise to a new institution and a new occupation for
a selected few--that of the Court Jew.
As banker, financial agent, mint master, and purveyor of war
supplies and luxuries for the local ruler, the Court Jew became as
much a fixture at court as the Court Physician or Court Jester.
Emulating the splendor of the palace of Louis XIV at Versailles, each
prince and ruler wanted to rebuild his territories, but each had at
the same time an insatiable need for the luxuries that added luster to
the pomp and grandeur of his court. It was the Court Jew's job to
serve these purposes. In the process, he often rose high in his
master's service and achieved influence not infrequently extending
beyond the economic into matters of politics and diplomacy. Freed from
the restrictions that encumbered Jews elsewhere, he could travel and
live as he wished. Personal wealth and influence were among his
rewards, and all Court Jews took full advantage of this, although not
always with sufficient prudence and restraint. It was, therefore, also
a dangerous profession, subject to court jealousies and intrigues,
exposed to the envy of others and always at risk as a lightning rod
for popular resentment against the ruler.
Court Jews are important in the history of Germany's Jews. Though they
adopted many of the styles and habits of the world of the court and
became considerably more worldly and emancipated than their isolated
brethren, they nevertheless retained their attachment to their people
and used their position of influence to benefit them. They were the
first German-Jewish aristocrats, the first emancipated Jews to move
into the gentile world, and in some cases, the ancestors of the top
levels of German Jewry in later generations. Many became patrons of
Jewish culture and learning and were appointed leaders and spokesmen
for the community.
Unfortunately, there was a less positive side to this coin. The
Court Jew could be helpful in good times, but when he fell from
grace--an ever-present risk--the impact on all Jews could be severe.
That, precisely, was the fateful case of one famous, early Court
Jew--a certain Lippold, who in 1556 had succeeded another, "the
faithful Michel," as Court Purveyor to Joachim II, Elector of
Brandenburg. From all accounts Lippold was clever and indefatigable,
but also greedy and unscrupulous, and when he fell, all of
Brandenburg's Jews were made to suffer.
Lippold ingratiated himself with the Elector by catering tirelessly
to his taste for wine, women, and song. He quickly grasped his
master's weakness for trinkets and jewels for his mistresses, cloth
and favors for his courtiers, and luxuries for himself. When a
favorite, the young Magdalena, had a wish, Lippold was ready to meet
it--at a price, of course: A little box for her dolls, a golden
necklace, a bit of sugar candy for eight taler, a tumbler for nine and
a half, velvet for a dress, and much more. Lippold's books are full of
these entries recording his business with the Elector.
In gratitude, the Elector appointed him Chief of all of
Brandenburg's Jews, collector for Jewish and other taxes, Master of
the Mint, and administrator of the coin of the realm. Lippold became
indispensable to the ruler; he grew extraordinarily wealthy, partly by
running all manner of entrepreneurial activities on the side, money
lending and pawnbroking included.
Tax collectors and pawnbrokers are never popular, particularly if
they are unscrupulous corner cutters, and Lippold was no exception.
When the Elector died, retribution came swiftly. His successor had
Lippold arrested the next day, and the anger of the people against the
debauchery of the old Elector and his mint master preordained his
doom; two years later Lippold was put to death, drawn and quartered on
the rack. But "a Jew is a Jew," and so the entire community had to
bear the brunt of his downfall. In 1573, all Jews were driven from
Brandenburg, not to return until Frederick William, the Great Elector,
called them back a hundred years later.
Not all Court Jews were as rapacious as Lippold, nor as
unfortunate. There were dozens who served at the courts of Germany's
rulers and many served faithfully and well. Most became wealthy
founders of dynasties of Jewish bankers and merchants, the early
leaders of the broader emancipation of Germany's Jews. We shall
frequently encounter their descendants over succeeding generations.
7
Will Durant has called the ability of the Jews to recover from
misfortune "one of the impressive wonders of history, part of that
heroic resilience which man in general has shown after the
catastrophes of life." His observation is meant to apply to all of
the Jewish people. But nowhere is it more to the point than in the
case of Ashkenazi Jews--and in particular to the survival and eventual
renaissance of Germany's Jews.
At the end of the Thirty Years' War, Jews had lived somewhere on
German soil for at least a millennium and a half, and probably longer.
They had come as free citizens with equal rights--vintners, merchants,
traders, and colonizers among the indigenous tribes. Some had occupied
respected positions as scholars, physicians, and advisors. At first
they had lived in relative peace and prosperity and then, for many
centuries, they had endured unimaginable hardship and suffered through
unending cycles of disaster and death.
They had come to Germany with a deep attachment to their ancient
religion and never surrendered it though it became the principal
source of their distress. Abandoning their faith as the world around
them was Christianized would have saved them untold suffering. Yet
they stubbornly clung to their religion even when they had to die for
it or were made pariahs without honor or rights.
Few people in history have faced so many indignities, and so much
misfortune for so long a time. Survival and regeneration under these
circumstances is little short of a miracle.
One thousand five hundred years of separation from their Oriental
origins had transformed the Ashkenazim into Europeans, albeit a
special and unique minority. Their isolation had reinforced ancient
tendencies to look inward and to focus on themselves. Looked down on
and tormented by others, they had, as if in self-defense, begun to
look down in turn on their tormentors. Having been made outcasts,
they learned to glory in their fate and to make it a badge of virtue.
Long periods of persecution and suffering taught them stoicism,
acceptance of adversity, and above all the techniques of survival. The
frequent expulsions, flights, and forced dispersions through many
lands far beyond Germany's borders cemented their sense of a common
destiny. Their fraternal ties with Jews everywhere created bonds and
networks that became the foundation for commercial and financial
advantage at a later stage. Stereotyped as fit only for a few
occupations, they learned to excel in them and to live by their wits.
Finally, in the isolation of their faith, without a homeland and
with only their religion to sustain them, they made it the focus of
their spiritual and intellectual lives, and this in turn led to a love
of learning, of literacy, of abstract thinking, and of intellectual
pursuits in general. Their separation from the surrounding
civilization brought about the development of their own language,
literature, and culture. And as outsiders, cut off from society's
institutions, mutual need led to the growth of their own communal
structures and their own folkways, rules, and social traditions. All
of these factors not only explain their survival but also are at the
root of their traditions and their character.
Their story is one of miraculous survival, but it is also a history
full of paradox: Isolation over centuries was painful, but it was also
the key to their survival as a people. Segregation was a bitter pill,
but it also ensured their preservation. Stubborn resistance to
conversion caused untold suffering, but it was also the foundation for
a rich culture and their love of learning. The death of many and the
flight east of most others was a disaster, but it was also the source
of regeneration--the basis for the subsequent expansion of Jewish
communities in Germany. Exclusion and grinding poverty were a curse,
but they also taught the Jews how to recognize and seize opportunity,
to adapt rapidly to changes in economic conditions and to turn them to
their advantage. Discrimination and restrictions led to deep
frustration, but in time they also became the wellspring of their
pent-up energies, their restlessness, and their drive for acceptance
and personal success.
When, late in the seventeenth century, the Jews gradually reentered
Germany's Christian world, it was very much as products of these
special factors, which had produced unique skills, qualities, and
character traits. Of course, like people everywhere, Jews were a
diverse group, with the same weaknesses and human foibles as others.
Their stultifying ghetto isolation, while extreme, did reflect the
outside world: the negative alongside the positive, areas of ignorance
and superstition alongside wisdom, and narrow-mindedness mixed with
instances of spiritual grandeur. Seventeenth-century Jews, no less than
Christians, had their fools as well as their sages, thieves as well as
scholars, rogues as well as the righteous, bigots as well as liberals.
|  |
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|