Posted by: Cathy Arnst on October 25
A bit of a brouhaha erupted recently over basketball games at the White House. Seems President Barack Obama likes to unwind over a friendly game of basketball, and invites a rotating squad of high-level Washington power brokers to join him on the White House court. All of them, of course, are men, a growing point of contention in the feminist blogosphere.
I can already hear the groans from many readers, who likely think this is just a bunch of angry women getting their knickers in a twist over some minor male/female difference. I might have thought the same, except for an image that stopped me short while reading a front page story in the New York Times about the controversy, headlined “Man’s World At White House? No Harm, No Foul, Aides Say.”
First of all, that headline is a tad misleading. It is the president’s male aides who see “no harm, no foul.” Five women who work in the White House, all of whom asked for anonymity because of concerns of appearing “publicly critical” (i.e., not good girls?) responded with eye rolls and complaints when asked about the sports-heavy atmosphere in the White House. But what I found most disturbing was the mention of an off-the-record meeting that White House communications director Anita Dunn recently hosted for women reporters—over chocolate chip and oatmeal cookies!!!
Well isn’t that sweet? The gals got together over cookies—homemade, I hope, by one of the attendees—while the guys solved the world’s problems on the playing field.
I’m particularly sensitive to this issue because I have no interest in professional sports. This failure on my part has often left me looking on with a weak smile while the editors I’ve worked for throughout my career (virtually all men) talked about last night’s game. I despise football (the remnants of growing up in a football-mad small town), I couldn’t care less about March Madness, and though I do pay slight attention to the Red Sox, I am not all that interested in the World Series when they aren’t in it. Nor do I know the first thing about tennis or golf. Has that hurt my career? Who knows? I’m guessing that there are plenty of work environments where it would.
I realize that women have come a long, long way over the last 50 years, as well-documented in the excellent new book When Everything Changed: The Amazing Journey of American Women from 1960 To the Present, by New York Times columnist Gail Collins. From her publisher:
The interviews with women who have lived through these transformative years include an advertising executive in the 60s who was not allowed to attend board meetings that took place in the all-male dining room; and an airline stewardess who remembered being required to bend over to light her passengers’ cigars on the men-only ‘Executive Flight’ from New York to Chicago. We, too, may have forgotten the enormous strides made by women since 1960—and the rare setbacks. “Hell yes, we have a quota [7%]” said a medical school dean in 1961. “We do keep women out, when we can.” At a pre-graduation party at Barnard College, “they handed corsages to the girls who were engaged and lemons to those who weren’t.” In 1960, two-thirds of women 18-60 surveyed by Gallup didn’t approve of the idea of a female president. Until 1972, no woman ran in the Boston Marathon, the year when Title IX passed, requiring parity for boys and girls in school athletic programs (and also the year after Nixon vetoed the childcare legislation passed by congress).
All of that sounds like ancient history now. It’s hard to believe that just a few decades ago women weren’t allowed to have a credit card or mortgage in their own name, much less hold an executive position or run for president. But it’s not all that ancient. Women still earn 78 cents for every dollar earned by men in similar jobs, with similar levels of education and experience. In business, politics, journalism and law women occupy only 20% of leadership positions (and much lower in Fortune 500 firms), despite making up 48% of the workforce. I don’t know if playing basketball with the residents of the executive suite would change any of that. But it might be nice to be invited. Or have the men join us for cookies.
I’d love to hear from women, and men, out there in the working world: Is facility with a ball, or knowledge of last night’s scores, an important career booster in your office?
Gail Collins wrote another great book, "America's Women: 400 Years of Dolls, Drudges and Helpmates." If you ever feel overworked, just read the chapter on a woman's life in the colonies and you'll feel like a total slacker!
My mother was sued when she ran for office. Why? She had never changed her name when she married. Her opponent said she had no right to use her own name. At the time, it was "normal" to take a husband's name upon marrying. To me, that is part of the point, discrimination appears cloaked in "normalcy" and that is part of why it is so hard to get rid of. Its not gone either.
i think there are plenty of men out there who aren't interested in sports but if that's the glue that bonds their workmates together they make sure they know the score from last night's game before going to work in the morning. That part of things is no different from "getting" interested in golf or art or running or a particular cause because your boss (male or female) is, or going out to a bar even though you don't drink because that's what your colleagues do.
Sometime there is a common interest that binds coworkers together. If you don't choose to schmooze that way that's OK. Find another way to connect. But I don't think you can complain that you're feeling penalized because you don't want to be interested in whatever it is that everyone else likes.
Regarding the basketball games, could women colleagues join in if they wanted to? Could they hang out and watch the games so they can be in on the conversation? Does Obama make a point of connecting with the non-hoops playing people in the west wing in other ways? the games per se aren't a problem. It's really how a manager manages and how he/she values and interacts with people over all. And how those people take it upon themselves to manage the relationship.
http://twitter.com/extremecareer
There is no doubt men are in control and one day women will take control. But, how is that going to bring happiness in your life. Is your life just for earning money and spending it. Do you believe that God created us just to make money for some 80 years and die? Have you ever thought about life beyond that? Do you believe in one God and that he is in power over all things and that he didn't create men and women just to live in this world for some 100 years. Think hard and think wise. Please don't misunderstand me, as I am not asking you to stop working. You should work and achieve something and support yourselves and your family. But, don't get too caught up just too much in the worldly affairs and lose the big picture. God has promised us the eternal ilfe only in the heaven or hell. We will be living there some trillions and trillions of years. So, prepare for that as well. Submit yourselves to one God, take care of your family, respect all human beings, pray, donate. If you need to know more and be wise read Koran.
Ah yes, feminism. What a joke.
That's why you (men) shouldn't marry the entitled, abrasive and manly American princesses the media pumps out. Personally, I can only hope I end up with an eastern European or Asian woman.
Woman are currently having their cake and eating it too. Somethings gotta give.
Cathy:
I'm going to assume that you've dated guys in the past or are married. You know then that on certain days of the week it happens to be guy time. It would seem to me that Obama is simply looking for some guy time during these periods. The New York times supports this view by saying "while Mr. Obama does place women in important roles, his comfort level with staff members is not always perceived as equal."
Many men need guy time at certain times of the week just as some girls need girl time. The staff team that Obama works with are his friends since he is around them so much. When he needs to unwind he hangs out with the guys. Just as it would be weird for me ask my girlfriend to let me go out with her when she is with her girlfriends it would be weird for her to ask to come to a poker night with my guy friends.
I don't mean this as an ad hominem attack, but it seems that your past experiences are coloring your perception of the issue. One example you give is, "I’m particularly sensitive to this issue because I have no interest in professional sports. This failure on my part has often left me looking on with a weak smile while the editors I’ve worked for throughout my career (virtually all men) talked about last night’s game.".
The women white house staffers do not seem to be upset by the issue. Mark Liebovich says, "In interviews, five women who work in the White House or advised officials there described the culture with more of a collective eye-roll than any real sense of grievance or discomfort."
I would be lying if I said that not knowing NBA scores has not helped me develop a better connection with some of my bosses, but trying to act like you like sports if you don't is disingenuous. Sports are not the only way to develop a good connection with your boss or move your career forward. I may not be able to relate to my female bosses/co-workers on baking cookies, but might find out we went to the same college.
Good article and commentary. True, it hasn't been that long. Maybe our media folks should take this into account when they write articles about the "repression" of women around the world, i.e., drama-fueled exposes about Islamic veils, etc.
In this blog, BusinessWeek’s Lauren Young, Cathy Arnst, Diane Brady, Karyn McCormack, Anne Newman, Mauro Vaisman, Lourdes L. Valeriano, and Joy Katz, Mark Hyman, along with freelance writer Savita Iyer-Ahrestani, lead a broad discussion of the issues and day-to-day concerns of working parents, offering up interviews with work/life experts, examinations of relevant research, and their personal accounts of bouncing between separate, sometimes conflicting worlds.