Posted by: Cathy Arnst on August 27
I’m about to go public with a secret few people from my current world know: When I was a senior in high school I won the Betty Crocker Homemaker Of Tomorrow award. OK, stop laughing. It was based on a multiple choice test that I signed up for only because it got me out of two class periods. I happened to get the highest score, a surprise to everyone, especially me. It came with a shot at a $1500 scholarship (which I didn’t win), a charm bracelet and a letter, hand signed by Betty Crocker, stating “You now have the satisfaction of knowing you are prepared for the most rewarding career a woman can have—that of a homemaker.” Words I will never forget, because even back then, in tiny Portville NY, where no woman I knew had a professional career, I had a feeling that the world contained more rewarding careers than that of a homemaker. And yet, and yet…I am regularly reminded that much of the nation still thinks like Betty Crocker.
In the letters to the editor column of the New York Times today, there was this missive in response to a piece about the miniscule progress women have made in politics:
Recently I received a newsletter pitch to buy back-to-school supplies that started with the words: “The thought of leaving Mom’s home cooking and Dad’s math tutoring can be traumatic”… As in the old days, moms are good for their home skills and dads are for the serious stuff. The newsletter is run by a woman.
Then there was Michelle Obama’s speech Monday at the Democratic convention. This is a highly accomplished woman, a Harvard-educated lawyer who earned well into the six figures as a hospital administrator. But as The New York Times approvingly noted:
Mrs. Obama’s presentation touched just a bit on her own career, as a lawyer, community organizer and hospital executive, concentrating instead on her roles as a daughter, a mother, a sister and a wife.
Or how about newly named vice-presidential candidate Joe Biden, discussing his wife Jill, who holds a doctorate in education, again in the New York Times
“My wife, Jill, who you’ll meet soon, who’s drop-dead gorgeous. She also has a doctorate degree, which is a problem.”
(To be fair, the Times goes on to say that Biden is “proud, if slightly intimidated” by her multiple degrees).
BusinessWeek added more evidence, in this story on a new study from UC-Berkeley examining the surprisingly high number of Harvard graduates with MBAs who have dropped out of the work force to become stay-at-home mothers. Professors Catherine Wolfram and Jane Leber Herr followed the careers of nearly 1,000 women who graduated from Harvard between 1988 and 1991, using biographical data culled from 10th and 15th anniversary reunion surveys. By the time they were 15 years out of college, 28% of the Harvard women who went on to get their MBAs were stay-at-home moms. Of those who became lawyers, 21% had dropped out at the 15 year mark (Interestingly, only 6% of women who got medical degrees had opted out, refuting a common worry in the medical profession that woman doctors aren’t committed to their profession). The story quotes lots of experts with lots of theories on why this might be, including this one:
Another consideration is that many of these women are married to men who are just as ambitious as they are, said Joan Williams, director of the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California…Men who are in the upper ranks of their profession with stay-at-home-wives earn 30% more than men who are married to women who work, she said. Those men who want to reach the highest rungs of their career and earn the most money often need a stay-at-home wife to take care of all other aspects of their life, including raising a family, Williams said. “And since many women in business school marry those men, they end up being stay-at-home wives, regardless of their own vision of what they wanted from their careers,” Williams said.
As I’ve written before, and I’m sure I’ll write again, it amazes me that, despite the fact that 70% of mothers with children under 18 work, despite the fact that less than 8% of professional women born since 1956 have left the workforce for more than a year, so many out there still think that “a homemaker is the most rewarding career a woman can have.” Here’s an idea. Why not start a company that hires out “professional wives” so everyone can get themselves a happy homemaker? If wife is such a great career, let’s at least get paid for it.
People already hire housekeepers, nannies, and butlers. Your business idea will not work.
It is easier for doctors to work part-time, hence less dropoff than MBAs or Lawyers
I certainly agree with GK's point on part-time options for doctors. The reason many other professionals exit the workforce is that the current work place model demands extreme hours for these types of careers. If women had the option of choosing flexible hours or a modified workload, many would do it in a heart beat. Given that caring work is essential in a family, and is not easily outsourced, women are the ones that are most often sidelined. PEW research shows that 60% of women view part-time work as ideal. Part-time work maintains skill sets, networks, and future earning potential and allows the changing needs of a family to be met in a less stressful manner. Each family's choice is framed by the context of their lives, but the choices are all too often limited by an outdated work force model.
At www.youronramp.com we support professional women in their career transitions as they look to invest their intellectual capital and search for sanity and balance.
Wow, that is a deep dark secret. (As a friend and BusinessWeek colleague I can say that your very good cooking is not a secret, though.) Now, whenever anyone asks me about you, I am just going to say: "Cathy Arnst. Betty Crocker. Same thing." (And of course I agree with all your far weightier points in this post, but I have been stunned into superficiality by Betty.)
Good God! What scandal! What impropriety! Some women still actually prefer being homebodies!
Oh leave poor Ms. Obama alone. There's nothing wrong with being proud and embracing your biology.
It's already been proven that females are more driven to nurture while males to conquer. It is perfectly natural for Mrs. Brown to still choose staying home with the kids while Mr. Brown goes out to earn the bacon.
The working world is too competitive. There's too many people, not enough jobs.
This hetero sex role didn't just pop out of nowhere hundreds of years ago. Believe it or not, many perfectly healthy women enjoy cooking, cleaning, sewing, gardening and breastfeeding.
Of my three jobs, all of which I consider full-time: mother, owner and chief photographer of a thriving photography business, and as an editor in a NY newspaper, I consider my role as mother to be the most rewarding, the most important and by far the most fun. Why write about "the wife job" in such negative tones, as if there might be something wrong with an intellectual, creative person enjoying running a home?
I've been a homemaker now for 15 yrs.How can we start something with the goverment so we can get paid for all of the many jobs we have rolled into one. I think this is an issue that needs to looked into.
In this blog, BusinessWeek’s Lauren Young, Cathy Arnst, Diane Brady, Karyn McCormack, Anne Newman, Mauro Vaisman, Lourdes L. Valeriano, and Joy Katz, Mark Hyman, along with freelance writer Savita Iyer-Ahrestani, lead a broad discussion of the issues and day-to-day concerns of working parents, offering up interviews with work/life experts, examinations of relevant research, and their personal accounts of bouncing between separate, sometimes conflicting worlds.