barker.online
BY
ROBERT BARKER
|
OCTOBER 27, 1999 |
Diary
of a Day Trader, Part 4
|
"The big problem with most traders is that they
are too interested in the 'big killing'"
|
George
Henel, a day trader from Buffalo, N.Y., thinks that his breed
gets a bad rap, so he agreed to share several weeks' worth of his
experiences with BW Online Columnist Robert Barker and his readers.
Here's Part 4 of the six-part series.
Monday, Sept. 20
No pay today. In fact, I have 5,000 shares of Anadarko (APC)
overnight. We have done this before, but at higher levels. I am underwater
about $3,000 but feel that all the oil stocks were sold today, and
we were just part of it. The American Petroleum Industry oil-inventory
statistics are out tomorrow night. There could be jitters over this
or possibly an OPEC meeting Wednesday. Most likely the latter.
Cooler weather is starting in Buffalo today. I also noticed that natural
gas prices were up about nine cents today. Bottom line: I have one
of the best oil and gas stocks in inventory. I don't like the size
of my position but think that the "boys" will rally the averages with
the oils at some point this week.
There certainly are a lot of investment techniques, but I like the
"value" approach. It gives you a cushion if you are wrong in your
timing of a stock purchase. Unlike trading highly volatile tech and
Nasdaq stocks, this approach gives you the comfort of knowing that
if your timing is wrong, you can -- within limits -- maintain your
position and be an investor for a few days or weeks. This element
of stock selection can also reduce the amount of stress that is usually
associated with trading.
As I see it, the big problem with most traders is that they are too
interested in making the "big killing" and are not conscious of the
magnitude of the risks they are taking on to do it. The risk-reward
ratio is so extreme that their trades come closer to gambling than
investing.
Let's analyze this a little further. Technology stocks are the usual
tool of the day trader. I guess I have never understood why there
is so much greed in these types of stocks. Everyone seems to think
that they have discovered the next Microsoft (MSFT)
and are more than willing to pay $100 for a company that may have
20 cents in earnings and pays no dividend. A stock of this character
probably has a book value of $2. The excitement in the stock stems
from the fact earnings are "up 100%," from a dime last year.
Now if you step back and throw a little cold water on you face and
look at this thing [the stock], you have to say that it is very "light"
on any intrinsic value if the concept behind the stock falters or
if earnings sputter. The company and stock are an idea, a dream. And
don't tell me, "but it's high tech, it's the wave of the future."
Well, I can still show you my Bomar calculator that I paid $125 for
when they came out. It can add, subtract, and divide. The company
was the one of the first to market a calculator and went out of business.
Some places give these things out free today.
Tuesday, Sept. 21
Quite cold today -- 45 degrees. Almost could use gloves on my morning
walk. Hoping that Anadarko will go against the 100-point loss as of
9:45 a.m.
Looks like gold and white metals higher.
Wednesday, Sept. 22
Sometimes you just can't figure. Everything I mentioned about oil
happened as planned -- except for the fact that Anadarko went down
again today. It had been up, but I think we have some big tax sellers
here. The whole energy complex is up this evening in night trading.
I will tough this out a little more. Standard & Poor's must think
APC is a value, too. They raised it to a 5-star buy on Sept. 20. They
said "APC is now trading at a solid discount to its estimated reserve
per share, and sees this as a chance to buy one of the industry's
players at a good price."
It was a funny day. We had a "buy program" which raised everyone's
spirits, but the sellers were still there late in the afternoon. I
tried to day trade a 1,000 [shares of] APC and 1,000 Cooper Cameron
(CAM)
with no luck, except for $95. I did take about $1,000 on Stillwater
Mining (SWC)
in other family accounts.
So I will continue to do damage control. One thing that encourages
me a bit is that the Nasdaq was up today. America Online (AOL)
up about six points. This is aggressive money. But maybe people who
buy these types of stock never worry anyhow.
I note that Phelps Dodge (PD)
raised its bid for Asarco (AR)
to $25 per share. This was one of the stocks I always thought to be
undervalued. I traded it as low as $14. You can see that I wasn't
the only one who saw value in this stock. Another of my "friends"
was Getchel Gold. I last traded about 5,000 shares at the $15 level
with a small profit, when the following week it was taken over at
around $30 per share. I also had a bank stock which I sold in the
low 30s, only to see it taken out at $72 a year later. It kind of
hurts to miss these opportunities (and gains).
I view Anadarko to be a potential target. I have seen it mentioned
on "target" lists. Unfortunately, you can wait for a long time and
it may never happen. But the value is still there, and if the market
pushes it low enough, some company will try to take it out. So if
you are going to trade, why not trade in these fertile fields?
Friday, Sept. 24
Not a good day. Someone at Microsoft (MSFT)
reiterated a comment that he thought that tech stocks and Microsoft
were overvalued. Doesn't seem like anything new, but this was the
catalyst for yesterday's 200-point decline.
We are down 500 points for the week and could be through Dow 10,000
in a whisper.
Everyone has pushed, pushed, and pushed this market. Merrill (MER)
this week recommended General Electric (GE)
at 40 times year 2000 earnings. They also started an Internet fund
of some sort just after recommending their "Christmas Basket" of Internet
stocks several weeks ago.
CNBC is barely talking about the decline yesterday. In fact, shortly
after (and while) it happened, they were talking about stocks that
went up. This shows that they don't report market news but rather
try to formulate market opinion.
Bottom line: Yesterday was very close to a panic sell-off. Broke some
big technicals.
I sold some stocks to get off margin and lost about $2,300. Still
own the Anadarko. Oil was up almost 75 cents yesterday and they even
sold the oil stocks near the close. The drawdown in APC is getting
close to my entire profit for September. If this decline continues,
it may turn into a rout. The baby will go out with the bath water.
It doesn't matter. Value may take a long time to recover. The major
trend may have reversed. I have a good record August-to-August and
may sell to defend it.
Saturday, Sept. 25
Things could not have been much worse for the market this week. I
believe the Dow lost over 4%. I have feared this type of sell-off
for some time. It just never seemed to come.
My Anadarko dropped some more. When I look at other energy producers
such as Burlington Resources (BR)
and Apache (APA),
it was a tough week for them as well. Hard to understand, since oil
is still around $24.74 a barrel.
I bought some J.C. Penney (JCP)
on Friday. This seems like a real value. The stock closed at a multiyear
low, at about $34.50. The book value is around $27. The stock dividend
is $2.18 for a yield of 6.3%. The stock goes "ex-dividend" on Oct.
6 for a quarterly payout of 54 cents a share (already declared). So
here we have a major stock close to its book value, yielding 6.3%,
going into its strongest quarter of the year (the holiday selling
season), selling at a new multiyear low, and a company which has promised
to pay you 54 cents in dividends in less than three weeks. Yet in
watching the tape Friday, you couldn't believe how desperate the institutions
were to get out of this stock. Very big blocks approaching 100,000
shares which "had to be done" with great urgency.
This purchase brings up a technique which I sometimes use when trading.
I call it "trading up to a dividend." A very simple concept. I have
a list of major companies and the dates their stocks go ex-dividend.
In this way, I can look at stocks in calendar order before they declare
their dividend and see if they might be a good trade going into their
dividend. The dividend adds some security to the trade since normally
the stock trades up ("lifts") as we get close to the "ex" date. I
may or may not stay for the dividend, but if things go against me
I can always sit with the stock and get paid for the wait.
One caveat: Some stocks, believe it or not, will go down the day before
they go "ex." Once Arco (ARC)
went down $2 the day before it went "ex" on a 75-cent dividend. It
then went up several dollars after. Normally, though, if the stock
looks like a good trade, the dividend will increase the probability
of success. Once again, you have to know how a given stock normally
acts as it approaches the ex-dividend date.
"Trading up to a dividend" is so elementary, but you know, I have
never seen it discussed anywhere. It seems like a natural for increasing
the probability of a trade. Maybe it could be that most people don't
trade stocks that pay dividends?
(Tomorrow: Part 5 of Diary of a Day Trader: "We're due for a rally")
Barker
covers personal finance in his weekly column, The Barker Portfolio,
for Business Week from Melbourne Beach, Fla. And he appears every
Friday on Business Week Online
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
EDITED
BY DOUGLAS HARBRECHT |