After the prices of wheat and eggs soared during the past year, supermarket shoppers now find they're spending an extra quarter for each pound of pasta. Four sticks of margarine cost an extra 60¢. Even the cold glass at the frozen food section has become foreboding: Ice cream is up nearly 6%. But walk down other aisles, and the outlook doesn't seem as grim. Corn and wheat prices may have doubled in the past year, but somehow breakfast cereal prices have stayed relatively flat.
Forgive shoppers if they feel like traders climbing into the pit at the Chicago Board of Trade. As prices for commodities such as wheat, corn, and eggs have climbed, there seems to be no telling how it will trickle down to the cost of individual grocery items. Items like pasta, made with wheat and eggs, have become much more expensive, yet soda, which is often made with corn syrup, has stayed relatively level.
Adding to the confusion, flooding in the Midwest will lead to a new round of price increases in the next year, experts say, though not necessarily in the areas consumers might expect. Corn and soybean fields were flooded, and their commodity prices jumped rapidly. But foods like bacon, ribs, and chicken will probably see the most dramatic price increases.
Why do some items seem to skyrocket, while others—even some containing similar ingredients—barely budge? It's not just shoppers who are having trouble understanding the relationship. The experts are perplexed, too. Ephraim Leibtag, who forecasts food prices for the Agriculture Dept., expects food prices to rise 4.5% to 5.5% overall in 2008. But he acknowledges that fluctuations in the commodities markets complicate those predictions. "Predictive models are less useful in volatile situations," he said. "That's why everyone's worried, because they don't really know."
Prices can shift for all sorts of reasons, including increased demand for a product from foreign consumers, changes in government subsidies, and freakish weather that reduces supply.
In the past year or so, the amount of the price increase for various foods has depended heavily on how much processing the food requires. The more money a manufacturer spends on molding the food into bite-size pieces, putting it in a shiny box, and advertising it on TV, the more the consumer is paying for those accoutrements rather than the raw materials themselves. When commodity prices rise, heavily processed foods don't rise as quickly because the commodity is just a small part of the overall price. When corn prices triple, the cost of cornflakes doesn't triple, largely because the price of cornflakes already includes a lot of processing, packaging, and marketing costs. Raw fruits and vegetables, on the other hand, are more likely to respond quickly to changes in commodity prices.
Not surprisingly, the average American's diet has become increasingly processed, packaged, and marketed. The "farm share" of domestically produced products—the percentage of the cost of retail food products that goes to the farmer—fell from 41% in 1950 to 19% in 2006. That percentage varies depending on the product. About 5% or less of the price of cereal, granola, and corn syrup are accounted for by farm prices. The farm value of eggs, meanwhile, accounts for more like 60% of the price. So, as farmers have cut the production of eggs in the past year, making them more scarce and expensive, the price of a dozen in the supermarket has increased accordingly, by 29%.
Food producers, wholesalers, and retailers also generally shift their excess costs for things like energy to consumers. But consumers don't always end up paying for the full increase. "Somebody in that chain will absorb the higher costs for a while," said John Lawrence, extension livestock economist at Iowa State University.