Health Care: Public Plan, 'Pay or Play' Provision May Go
Sources inside the process say the final bill probably won't contain a publicly financed insurance plan or a requirement that employers offer all their workers health benefits.
Of course, reform activity in Washington is moving at such a fast and furious pace that the details of any proposals can change hour to hour—and a deal could fall apart at the last minute. The Senate Finance Committee has said it wants to vote on a final bill before Congress goes on its summer recess Aug. 7, and though that deadline is looking harder and harder to achieve, no one is yet willing to say it's undoable. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions has already voted out a bill, and two of the three committees participating in the House Trilateral Committee have voted on their own bill. The provisions of all these different legislative proposals will have to be merged in a House-Senate conference committee, so it is uncertain at this point who or what will prevail.
Undercut Private Insurers? The publicly financed insurance plan is included in the House bill, but it has been a particular flash point in both chambers. Health insurers and many hospitals and doctors avidly oppose a public plan that would be financed by the government. They complain that, with no need to make profits, a public insurance plan would undercut private insurers on price and use its power to pay doctors and hospitals less, creating unfair competition.
But President Obama has long argued that only a public plan would inject much needed competition into the health insurance market, now dominated by one or two competitors in most states. As recently as July 23, Obama said: "The notion that all these insurance companies who say they're giving consumers the best possible deal, if they can't compete against a public plan as one option, with consumers making the decision what's the best deal, that defies logic, which is why I think you've seen in the polling data overwhelming support for a public plan."
Despite such public support, the Senate Finance Committee, led by Senator Max Baucus (D-Mont.), is instead considering a consumer-owned insurance co-op health plan. These co-ops would be owned and operated by their members, presumably the individuals and small business who have difficulty finding affordable insurance now. There are similar markets now in rural areas for electric power, phone service, and commodities such as milk and wheat, which makes the concept a familiar one to the many Republican senators from rural states. In fact, the co-op idea was designed and championed by Senator Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), a key member of the Finance Committee.
Conrad has proposed that insurance co-ops would be set up on either a statewide or regional level, be nonprofit, offer a number of coverage options, and operate under the same regulations that apply to private insurers. Though co-ops would likely offer lower-cost coverage for their members than they could buy on the open market, critics complain that they would be just another insurer, without the market power to negotiate lower prices with hospitals or lower premiums from competitors.
Taxing Health Benefits The Finance Committee is also looking to move away from the "pay or play" option that would require all but the smallest employers to either offer insurance benefits or pay a penalty. Instead, the committee is considering a "free rider penalty" on employers whose workers either end up on Medicaid or get some other form of subsidized care. As for taxing health benefits—an option to pay the costs of expanding health coverage—the Senate committee wants to tax only the most expensive health plans, but levy the fee on the employer rather than the employee.
Whether any of this will make it into the final Senate Finance version—or helps form the basis of a grand compromise that brings on board the "Blue Dog" conservative Democrats who currently are blocking passage of a bill in the House—remains to be seen. After a July 29 Washington Post story made it appear as though a bipartisan bill from the Senate committee is imminent, Russ Sullivan, staff director for the finance committee, sent out an e-mail to staffers that said, as reported in the online news site Politico.com, "While progress has been made in recent days, neither an accord nor an announcement is imminent. In fact, significant policy issues remain to be discussed among the Members, and any one of these issues could preclude bipartisan agreement. Members will continue their methodical work."
Senator Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), a member of the Finance Committee, sought to cool expectations for an imminent deal. "We still have several areas where we haven't been able to come to a consensus. No deal is at hand, and substantive issues, big and small, remain under discussion and need to be resolved," Enzi said in a prepared statement. He said he wanted to see an estimate from the Congressional Budget Office "before I can agree to any health-care reform bill," and added: "I also need commitments from Senator [Harry] Reid (D-Nev.) and Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi (D-Calif.), as well as the Administration, that the bipartisan agreements reached in the Finance Committee will survive in a final bill that goes to the President."
President's Must-Haves Meanwhile, Obama is working hard to shore up public support for reform, which has been wavering as more details on both the proposals and the $1 trillion price tag become available. Today he attended a town hall meeting at Broughton High School in Raleigh, N.C., and is flying to a Kroger (KR) supermarket in Bristol, Va., where he'll take questions from store employees on the need for health-care reform.
The White House said Obama will unveil eight specific consumer protections he insists will be in any health-care bill:
1) Insurers will not be allowed to refuse coverage because of preexisting conditions.
2) There will be yearly caps on how much can be charged for out-of-pocket expenses.
3) All preventive care, including regular checkups and screening tests, will be fully covered.
4) Insurers will not be allowed to drop or reduce coverage for those who become seriously ill.
5) No gender discrimination—men and women will pay the same premiums.
6) No annual or lifetime caps on the coverage received.
7) Children will be eligible for family coverage through the age of 26.
8) Insurers will be required to renew any policy as long as premiums are paid in full.