Posted by: Dan Beucke on July 26
Ben Bernanke doesn’t have to run for re-election. But he might consider doing it anyway.
In his hour-and-a-half conversation Sunday night with Kansas City small business people, teachers, social workers, bankers, and others gathered in a town hall setting along with Jim Lehrer of PBS, the Federal Reserve Board chairman displayed a folksiness that was about as far as you can imagine from the “constructive ambiguity” of his predecessor, Alan Greenspan.
Bernanke at turns talked of being “frustrated,” “disgusted,” and “angry” with having to bail out Wall Street bankers who rolled the dice and nearly ruined the financial system. He talked about “putting the pedal to the metal” to try to get the economy moving again. When asked about the nation’s massive deficits, he said Congress and the Obama Administration need to find a way to return to “fiscal sanity.”
At times he sounded like a financial counselor, cautioning that “there are a lot of scams out there,” telling a student not to get discouraged about the job market, and advising another questioner to keep some stocks in his diversified investment portfolio.
Mind you, this was still at its essence an hour-plus talk about economics, and when it appears on PBS TV stations Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday nights it won’t make anyone forget CSI. (Bernanke said he expects growth to pick up in 2010, but also thinks unemployment will stay high well into next year.) But his very appearance in such a setting showed just how important the Fed chairman thinks it is to explain the extraordinary powers he’s invoked to pull the U.S. economy out of its spiral. It was a step into public relations unlike anything seen from his predecessors, replacing the image of Fed chief as oracle with that of an embattled politician seeking relief from the Beltway echo chamber.
But then, Bernanke is in a reelection battle of sorts. His term expires on Jan. 31, and while the odds are that he’ll be reappointed by Obama, many critics blame him both for doing too little to recognize the risks in the system before the financial meltdown, and for broadening the Fed’s powers far beyond its mandate once the decline accelerated. Bernanke, along with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, has been under relentless assault in Congress for the steps he took -- and didn't take -- to arrest the decline of the credit markets and pump life back into the economy. Critics also want to stop the Administration from handing the Fed, and Bernanke, more power under its proposed regulatory overhaul.
Bernanke’s obsessive focus on maintaining liquidity – more than doubling the Fed’s balance sheet and opening its lending window to commercial businesses – “has, for now, averted the L-shaped near depression that seemed highly likely after the financial collapse last fall,” as economist Nouriel Roubini put it in a Sunday New York Times op-ed arguing for Bernanke’s reappointment.
Still, Bernanke represents just the kind of high-profile scalp that some in Washington would love to collect as payment for the calamity of the past two years. And not everyone agrees that the steps he’s taken have calmed things down. Next to Roubini in Sunday’s Times, economist Anna Jacobson Schwartz argued that Bernanke’s actions sowed confusion and volatility, and “ultimately failed to convince the market that the Fed had a plan, and was not performing ad hoc.”
Indeed, on Sunday night Bernanke as much as admitted that for a time the Fed and Treasury were winging it during the depths of the crisis last fall. He said letting Lehman fail wasn’t “a conscious decision” but rather resulted from not having the tools on hand to fill a $40 billion or $50 billion hole in the firm’s balance sheet. He took grief – in a polite, Midwest kind of way – from audience members for bailing out big banks and not small businesses, which Bernanke said was necessary to save the system. He admitted “we were late” in addressing the subprime mortgage crisis, adding, “I think we have to take some heat for that.” When asked who he’s responsible to, he said, “I’m answerable to the American people.”
Bernanke was most forceful in arguing against Congressional efforts to rein in the Fed. He explained that while Congress “already looks at our books,” some would put the Government Accountability Office, or GAO, in charge of monitoring the central bank’s monetary policy. “I don’t think that’s consistent with independence.”
As Don Lee of the Los Angeles Times pointed out Sunday, this isn’t the first time a Fed chairman has gone public: “In his rookie year as chairman, Greenspan gave an interview on 'Meet the Press' in October 1987, which some believe contributed to the stock market crash a week later. He never did another television interview in the next 18 years on the Fed.”
But, as Bernanke told the Times, "this is an extraordinary time" that requires extraordinary public outreach. "It's important for me to hear from people outside of Washington. And I want to answer the questions that I know people have about the economy, the Fed and the Fed's actions during this crisis."
The whole discussion will be online after Wednesday on the Online NewsHour Web site.
Ok Ben, it's time to come clean or face a revolution from an angry American population. The FED is a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT bank that can count all of the big financial institutions as stakeholders. This arrangement works against the interest of most Americans, as the FED controls congress and the Obama administration. The FED has INTENTIONALLY caused this financial mess and has used the fallout to increase its own powers. The same tactics were used during the Great Depression (caused by the FED, the FED got more powers during and after), and the same type of events happened to gain support for the creation of the FED in the first place. Congress is right to FINALLY rein in the FED's powers. ALL regulation should be done by the government, not the private FED. As much as I distrust the government, I trust bankers even less! At a minimum, the FED's books should be available to the government and American people--better yet, the government should take full control and ownership of the FED. The FED steals money from everyone when they counterfeit more of it, and then they charge you interest on it! There is no reason the government should have to borrow money from the FED, at interest, when they could print it themselves. Yes, this would cause an inflation tax, but it is no different then what the FED is already doing.
Crocodile's tears. Bernanke is destroying the dollar by printing three times the amount of currency. High inflation will be here within one year, not more than two years like he thinks. He says businesses are not in the position to raise prices. The biggest problem with this theory is that American businesses do not control prices of commodities or foreign labor cost. Most daily products today are imported from abroad, China especially. As the Chinese economy picks up as it is already doing, their labor cost will go up, driving up prices of imports to the US. Even if China can somehow keep wages from rising, the prices of commodities in US dollars will go up thanks to Bernanke's insane printing of the currency, thus driving up prices of imports to the US. China cannot absorb the rise in material cost because its margins are already razor thin. Many more American businesses will be squeezed out by late 2009 and 2010 because they can't raise prices to offset the higher cost of energy, creating another wave of unemployment. Thanks Ben!
The guy is a crook.
He did not save us from any depression.
Nothing has been fixed. There is no healing.
The credit bubble popped, but it is still inflated.
It's interesting that people like Warren Buffett are praising Ben Bernanke for what he did during the financial crisis. Ben Bernanke simply went to Congress and told them that he needed $700 BILLION or the WORLD ECONOMY would "meltdown", correct? And then Congress believed him, and the TAXPAYERS of America were the ones who BAILED-OUT the system, right? So, WHO really deserves the credit? Bernanke or the American PEOPLE? YOU BE THE JUDGE! P.S. According to a report earlier this year on the McGlaughlin Group, the quote- "Total taxpayer outlay from March 2008 to March 2009 was $5.32 TRILLION." If that's true, then every household in the USA acquired a $76,000 debt from March 2008 until March 2009, right? There are about 300 MILLION people living in the USA. 300 MILLION divided by 4.3 people per household equals about 70 MILLION households, correct? $5.32 TRILLION divided by 70 MILLION = $76,000.00, doesn't it? THANKS MR. BERNANKE!
Mr Bernanke has made some mistakes, yes; however, his "unique" actions have saved us. Quite frankly, at the end of the day, I think Mr Bernanke is the man!
After viewing the ‘Bernanke Road Show,” BW readers are persuaded that actor Bernanke is trying to win an Academy Award by his portraying himself in a folksy shtick called: I'm-on-your-side-kind-of-guy. Hidden behind that manicured beard and rehearsed monologue is a liar that makes your used car salesman pale in comparison. The truth is that Bernanke is not on your-side-kind-of-guy and "answerable to the American people" as he had claimed. Bernanke represents the Federal Reserve, a club of private bankers whose excessive greed caused the recent real estate boom/bust and Wall St meltdown. Since its creation in the early 1900s, the Federal Reserve and its greedy bankers are the cause of these boom/bust cycles that sap the economic strength of America as well as stealing money from Americans through inflation via unrelenting Green-back printing press. Just several years after its creation, the Federal Reserve's monetary action caused the '29 Depression and its subsequent "cure" created the second crash in '38. As to the current depression, the Federal Reserve has blindly thrown, as a "Stimulus", several trillions of dollars backed by taxpayer that basically benefited only its Big Bankers. Under Bernanke, the Federal Reserve has demanded equity position over several private business as mandatory condition of accepting TARP: AIG, GM, Chrysler, etc. Not with standing Bernanke Road Show’s friendly hometown atmosphere, his expansion of power is unprecedented and ruthless as well as unconstitutional. Regardless of the shtick Bernake is selling in Kansas, his Gig is up because the American people knows the truth about the Federal Reserve. The American people should demand abolishing the Federal Reserve and return the control of money supply back to the American government instead of placing it in the hands of a few private Big Bankers.
Washington Bureau Chief Jane Sasseen and other BusinessWeek writers peel back the curtain on the economy, business and money matters at the White House, Congress, and federal agencies.