BusinessWeek Logo

Retirement savings: The sleeper issue?

Posted by: Theo Francis on March 10

The Obama Administration’s agenda, and Congress’s, has focused heavily on health-care energy and education. But a fourth issue is gradually building in the wings – retirement security. At least one person close to the administration sees the issue growing in prominence over the coming months.

Small wonder. 401(k) plans have taken a big hit in the recession and financial crisis, losing some $600 billion, or 18% in 2008, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute – and that figure is low, since it adds in all the new contributions participants made during the year, among other things. Fidelity said its 401(k) accounts fell 27% on average.

The issue began garnering more attention during the last weeks on the campaign. As the financial markets seized up last fall, then-candidate Barack Obama proposed temporarily waiving penalties for some early withdrawals and suspending mandatory withdrawal rules for those over 70-1/2 in 2009 and 2010; McCain made similar proposals, and in December, Congress waived penalties for those who fail to make mandatory withdrawals this year.

Now, the Obama administration is making two retirement provisions in its budget proposal: One boosts the "savers' credit", a Clinton-era tax break encouraging middle- and lower-income Americans to set money aside for retirement by giving them a tax credit of 10% to 50% (for the lowest earners) of the amount they save.

The proposal would make the tax credit refundable – meaning even low-income workers who don’t pay taxes would benefit – and raise the eligibility threshold to incomes of $65,000 a year, from the current $55,500. It would also make the credit to 50% of contributions for all recipients.

The budget’s second retirement provision would require most employers to let workers contribute to an Individual Retirement Account through automatic payroll deductions – a concept shaped in part by Peter Orszag, now Obama’s budget chief, at the Retirement Security Project. Companies in business less than two years or with fewer than 10 employees would be exempt; so would employers with that already offer retirement plans.

Both ideas have garnered the support of the AARP, but the employers’ lobby has raised objections, and competing legislation is likely to surface.

Meantime, three nonprofit groups launched a bid on March 10 to revamp the retirement system more fundamentally, saying the current economic crisis throws into sharp relief the risks of relying on 401(k)s and similar accounts alone to supplement Social Security.

“They don’t provide enough protection against investment risk,” or against the risk of outliving one’s assets in retirement, said Steve Abrecht, director of benefits and capital stewardship for the Service Employees International Union, which sponsored the new group along with the Economic Policy Institute and the Pension Rights Center.

Update:As a commenter noted, we inadvertently omitted the fourth group founding Retirement USA: the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

Billing Retirement USA as something akin to the years-long effort to reform health-care in the U.S., the founding groups said they were seeking proposals for plan structures that would provide universal access to all working Americans and sufficient, lifetime income fore retirees. If successful, predicted the Pension Rights Center’s director, Karen Ferguson, “there would be a system, which we don’t have now – we have this hodgepodge.”

Reader Comments

PW

March 11, 2009 04:15 AM

Obama needs to handle the chronic diseases plaguing America, the really hard jobs, right now, while he's new in office. The country will be a better place, and will know it, by the time the next election comes around:

1. Re-design Social Security completely.
2. Fix health care (don't nationalize health care; nationalize funding of medical education--set up new med schools and make them free for all qualified students).
3. Simplify the tax code.
4. Close all foreign US military bases (spend the money on the poor in the USA instead: secure housing, soup kitchens, and job training).
5. Bring Israel to heel (phase out all $ aid to it and to Egypt--in sync--and stop all technology transfers; force it to sign nuclear treaties; enforce UN mandates re Palestine; write an airtight law to keep Israel's morphing US-based lobbies registered as foreign agents).

WorkAsPlan

March 11, 2009 07:32 AM

"401(k) plans have taken a big hit in the recession and financial crisis, losing some 18% in 2008" - Isn't this a actually a remarkable performance, not a "big hit" given the stock market was down some 40-50%? Doesn't this mean these plans are working as they are supposed to - people are not taking inordinate risk with their retirement, half or more of the funds are in more conservative investments? The savers on Main Street appear to be smarter than the traders on Wall Street - but we all knew that anyway.

Roland

March 11, 2009 11:23 AM

That "savers' credit" idea sounds dumb. Why not remove taxation for interest below some threshold. Taxing interest inhibits saving.

Peter

March 11, 2009 11:38 AM

If we have learned nothing else from this economic meltdown it is that private pension plans are a fraud. We need to increase Social Security taxes, remove the ceiling on Social Security taxes, and increase the benefits.

Rocky

March 11, 2009 12:04 PM

If employees had followed the advice of the so-called experts, they would have done much worse. The standard line was to keep your money in stock index funds. People who kept their money in stable value funds actually ended up with positive returns that were higher than money market funds and partly offset the big losses taken by investors in S&P 500 index funds or international funds.
PW is living in a dream world if he thinks any of the items on his wish list are going to come true. Medical school isn't even free in Canada, the land of high taxes and the single payer health care system.

Rocky

March 11, 2009 12:05 PM

If employees had followed the advice of the so-called experts, they would have done much worse. The standard line was to keep your money in stock index funds. People who kept their money in stable value funds actually ended up with positive returns that were higher than money market funds and partly offset the big losses taken by investors in S&P 500 index funds or international funds.
PW is living in a dream world if he thinks any of the items on his wish list are going to come true. Medical school isn't even free in Canada, the land of high taxes and the single payer health care system.

Squeezebox

March 11, 2009 04:58 PM

If the president was serious about people saving money, he'd make all deposits to savings accounts tax-free until withdrawn. IRA's should be converted to general-purpose "rainy day" funds. There should be no age-related penalties for withdrawal.

Theo Francis, BusinessWeek writer

March 11, 2009 08:47 PM

Thanks for all the thoughts, all. Just to clarify: The EBRI figures aren't quite a traditional rate-of-return calculation -- it just compares total 401(k) assets at the beginning and end of the year. That means it counts contributions to 401(k) plans during the year as offsetting market declines. So the 18% decline would have been substantially worse, except that many people continued their automatic contributions throughout the year. It also includes people signing up for a 401(k) for the first time sometime during 2008. Not a perfect measure, but certainly an indication of the financial pain people are feeling.

Scott

March 11, 2009 11:37 PM

Can you imagine where we'd be if we had put social security in equities?
Absolutely everything down to CEO's would political appointments.
What a mess, never mind having to bail out another failing institution!
http://moneyfinanceandpolitics.blogspot.com/

Pamela Causey

March 12, 2009 02:17 PM

Your article excluded the name of the fourth founding member of Retirement USA: the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, headed by former Congresswoman Barbara Kennelly.

Sam Burnett

March 13, 2009 06:14 PM

As we get into the solution of the economic crises we need to develope a program of Retirement Security for americamn workers. The folks that gave part of their income with business and industry to prepare for retirement it is now being taken away by courts. Have the Elected offical stop this action now. Many are being hurt!

Sam Burnett

March 13, 2009 06:14 PM

As we get into the solution of the economic crises we need to develope a program of Retirement Security for americamn workers. The folks that gave part of their income with business and industry to prepare for retirement it is now being taken away by courts. Have the Elected offical stop this action now. Many are being hurt!

Clyde

March 15, 2009 10:56 PM

If the Feds would just remove all taxes on bank account/CD's we would not need the stupid IRA accounts. Large amounts of money would be saved by individuals. Larger amounts of money would be saved by removing the accounting costs. Do away with stupid income tax. A consumption tax collected at point of sale merchants would even save larger amount of money for everyone. Oh, by the way, we need to impose term limits on U.S. Senators and U.S. Reps. This is so simple, if the little people would just stand up together and make real change we all would no longer owe our souls to the U.S. Treasury.

NHSkier

March 16, 2009 02:07 PM

Why not raise the max contribution to IRA accounts? There are plenty of younger workers looking to buy during this low and bolster their retirement in the long-term.

Jen

March 16, 2009 03:07 PM

The idea of not taxing interest earned on any kind of savings plan seems the most logical. To give a tax credit to those that don't pay taxes is just another plan of taking the taxes I paid and giving it away to someone that didn't pay taxes at all.
I'm very concerned about Social Security being means tested (you have too much saved and don't need what they promised from Social Security). Really scary.

Old guy

March 24, 2009 05:59 PM

It's too bad that Social Security can't go back into its own "untouchable fund", rather than the black hole called General Budget. Oh, well.

Post a comment

 

About

Washington Bureau Chief Jane Sasseen and other BusinessWeek writers peel back the curtain on the economy, business and money matters at the White House, Congress, and federal agencies.

Recent Comments

BW Mall - Sponsored Links