|
|
|
|
 |
BusinessWeek: January 17, 2000 |
|
|
ONLINE FEATURES
Book Reviews
BW Video
Columnists
Interactive Gallery
Newsletters
Past Covers
Philanthropy
Podcasts
Special Reports
BLOGS
The Auto Beat
Byte of the Apple
Europe Insight
Eye on Asia
Getting In
Investing Insights
The New Entrepreneur
NEXT: Innovation Tools & Trends
On Media
Technology at Work
The Tech Beat
Traveler's Check
TECHNOLOGY
Product Reviews
Tech Stats
Hands On
AUTOS
Home Page
Auto Reviews
Car Care & Safety
INNOVATION
& DESIGN Home Page Architecture Brand Equity Auto Design Game Room SMALLBIZ Smart Answers Success Stories Today's Tip FINANCE Investing: Europe Annual Reports Bloomberg BW50 SCOREBOARDS Hot Growth Companies: 2008 Mutual Funds Info Tech 100 B-SCHOOLS Undergrad Programs Rankings & Profiles |
|
International -- Readers Report
What About the Astonishing Greek Market? (int'l edition) Myron Mauricides Athens Return to top  Economic "Mixed Systems" Usually Get It Wrong (int'l edition) Regarding "The Seattle protesters got it right" (Economic Viewpoint, Dec. 20): We in Germany and in other countries of Europe have the daily experience of the perils of a wrong "mix." An endless number of local, regional, and national groups, committees, or organizations freeze things on nearly every level of decision. They decide that "we do not need a McDonald's" in this or that part of the town, protest against new industries, against new roads, against energy plants using any kind of resources (even wind energy), tell you not to drink mineral water and to drink tap water instead, and try by tricky means to enforce rules that more and more people find unreasonable. Mixed systems are not per se good and can just be a Pandora's box. The discussion should center on the question of the corrective mechanisms of different social systems. Mixed systems can easily use the escape clause of wanting a "better world" if the results are bad. In what I call "competitive capitalism," bad results lead to sanction or punishment. The "consensus system" of a mixed economy has nothing equal to this formidable corrective. And do not miss the point of freedom. Mixed systems can easily switch to rigid or even oppressive systems, with their mess of regulations that are not coherent and logical. On national and international levels, you risk the development of a net of irrational restrictions in life and business. I wish that we in Europe were more laissez faire, giving everyone a chance to compete and make the best of her/his skills and ideas. In this context, I see the U.S., not a World Trade Organization influenced by groups in the street, as the great defender of freedom. Johannes Wierer Ratingen, Germany The essence of capitalism is fair competition. Many capitalists do not like competition--they prefer monopolies and pricing agreements, or, as it is often phrased, they want to be the "dominant player." Therefore, competition watchdogs and antitrust enforcement are vital. But more is required: Competition should be fair. Fairness means no corruption, no child labor, adherence to environmental standards, liberty. Fairness does not mean the same salary, pensions, medical insurance, taxes, or working conditions beyond absence of damage to health. Vigorous and fair competition will lead to democracy. There is no example of a country with free and vigorous competition that is not a democracy. Laurens van den Muyzenberg South Ascot, England Return to top Free Trade Should Be a Two-Way Street (int'l edition) "Global growing pains" (News: Analysis & Commentary, Dec. 13) is not exact: Although the Group of 7 pushed the rest of the world to open markets to exports, the contrary is seldom seen. Led by the master preacher of liberalism, the U.S., Europe and Japan impose senseless barriers to imports from countries like Brazil. Less developed countries can export commodities, but whenever any value tries to be added to a product, any sign of industrialization is detected, barriers are immediately built to protect the home products. Germany doesn't grow coffee and has no tariffs on coffee beans but has an 18% tax on instant coffee. Why? Germany exports instant coffee. The U.S. has a tax on shoe imports of 5%, but it gets as high as 10% if the shoe is from Brazil. President Clinton says the Brazilian shoe industry uses slave labor. Little does he know that our plants are constantly inspected by the Labor Ministry, and any line misspelled on an order file is subject to high fines. Yes, let's go for free trade. But on a two-way road. Brazil's example is disastrous. Despite going by the rules of liberals, most "noncompetitive" industries have been bought by foreigners or shut down, and state-owned industries and services have been privatized. We are feeling the results: the highest rate of unemployment ever in our history, higher consumer prices of those products and services now "privatized," a plunge in their quality, and a negative result in the balance of payments. Free trade is positive as long as it is implemented by all countries. Globalization is good as long as it is done with consideration for local communities and local businesses. Joao Viggiani Sao Paulo Return to top | |
|
|
|
The WTO: Focus on Folks Left Out of the Loop (int'l edition) Regarding "Whose world is it, anyway?" (News: Analysis & Commentary, Dec. 20): Is Seattle a "brief conflagration" that won't spread or a "global fin de millennium" angst over a world speeding into uncharted territory? I have no doubt it's the latter. No day passes without a megamerger announced or a kid in his 20s becoming a millionaire overnight because a lot of "extremely anxious and trigger-happy" investors and venture capitalists feel that the Internet will be so huge that they can't afford not to bet on it today even though they don't know how they're going to make money. The Internet will be huge, thank you, but only as long as it remains free of charge. And if it's free, how are they going to reap the profits, not to mention generate revenues? The real change lies in the fact that a few corporations hiring some few hundreds of millions will be enough to provide everything for a world with 6 billion people. But who will provide for the 5 billion or so "unemployed"? Instead of discussing this, the WTO is wasting time with the wrong subjects. Antonio Camargo Sao Paulo Return to top To Prosper, Europe Needs a Truly Open Economy (int'l edition) No wonder Euroland is 15% poorer today than a year ago ("Germany is leading--in the wrong direction," International Business, Dec. 13). The leaders of the three largest euro-zone economies--Schroder, Jospin, and D'Alema--lack the vision to construct a strong, unified Europe and develop a more efficient and egalitarian system for all. Their interventionist attitudes in recent corporate deals, such as Holzmann, Mannesmann, EDF, and Michelin, are an insult to shareholders and to all European citizens. What is needed for voters to open their eyes, put aside fantasies, and learn that prosperity comes only with a complete open economy and hard work? Until these leaders start to think as a team of statesmen and not as tiny village mayors, there is no chance for a richer Europe or real economic and social progress. The irony is that Dusimberg has the right medicine, Aznar takes it, and it works in Spain, the hottest economy in the euro zone. As the old Spanish saying goes: Common sense is the less common of senses. Henry Daunert Barcelona Return to top Kudos for a Fedwatcher's Forecasting Model (int'l edition) I'm glad Professor Barro based his interest-rate forecast on a model ("How to build your own Fed crystal ball," Economic Viewpoint, Dec. 6). Despite being simple, it provides a systematic way of rationalizing the Fed's decisions. I have seen so many well-known and supposedly authoritative figures making unfounded interest-rate forecasts based solely on "experience." Experience does count. But a responsible forecast should be a product of both experience and systematic research. Stanley Ngan Hong Kong Return to top |
|
Copyright 2000-2012 Bloomberg L.P.Terms of Use | Privacy Notice |
