|
|
|
|
|
BusinessWeek: January 17, 2000 |
|
|
ONLINE FEATURES
Book Reviews
BW Video
Columnists
Interactive Gallery
Newsletters
Past Covers
Philanthropy
Podcasts
Special Reports
BLOGS
Auto Beat
Bangalore Tigers
Blogspotting
Brand New Day
Byte of the Apple
Economics Unbound
Eye on Asia
Fine On Media
Green Biz
Hot Property
Investing Insights
Management IQ
NEXT: Innovation
NussbaumOnDesign
Tech Beat
Working Parents
TECHNOLOGY
J.D. Power Ratings
Product Reviews
Tech Stats
Wildstrom: Tech Maven
AUTOS
Home Page
Auto Reviews
Classic Cars
Car Care & Safety
Hybrids
INNOVATION
& DESIGN Home Page Architecture Brand Equity Auto Design Game Room SMALLBIZ Smart Answers Success Stories Today's Tip INVESTING Investing: Europe Annual Reports BW 50 S&P Picks & Pans Stock Screeners Free S&P Stock Report SCOREBOARDS Hot Growth 100 Mutual Funds Info Tech 100 S&P 500 B-SCHOOLS Undergrad Programs MBA Blogs MBA Profiles MBA Rankings Who's Hiring Grads |
International -- European Cover Story
Putin's Russia (int'l edition) Can the former KGB spymaster deliver on promises to fix the chaotic Russian economy? Will Putin's rise to power usher in a new era of stability in Russia? From Moscow to Washington to Tokyo, politicians and diplomats are debating whether Putin, who spent only four months as Prime Minister, will be his own man or a mere puppet of Yeltsin's entourage. Many note with alarm that Putin's first move as Acting President was to sign a decree immunizing Yeltsin from future prosecution on any corruption charges. "This is an attempt to consolidate an old regime," warns Moscow political scientist Boris Kagarlitsky. "Putin is a weak person with the image of a strong man." RADICAL REFORM, NYET. But Putin may surprise his doubters. Even if he has lacked a political base before, he now has supreme institutional power as President. Three days before his appointment, he put out a sweeping manifesto on the Internet outlining his vision. It will be a "long and difficult journey," he says, but Russia will regain its former status as a "great power." Don't expect Putin to import American or European models, and radical reform is out. He calls for a gradual program based on "a new Russian idea" that emphasizes patriotism, social protections, and a strong state. "For Russians, a strong state is not an anomaly," Putin says online. "Quite the contrary, [Russians] see it as a source and guarantor of order" and the "main driving force of any change." But Putin's philosophy of a strong state does not hark back to the Soviet era of central planning. In his years as an economic spy in Germany, Putin came to understand that Russia can only be a great power if it is economically as well as militarily strong. Putin's KGB experience "drove home to him that the old command economy was like a dinosaur," says Michael Steiner, foreign policy adviser to German Chancellor Gerhard Schroder. "He knows that Russia needs a fully functioning, well-regulated, private-sector economy to thrive." Both Mikhail Gorbachev and Yeltsin tried, but failed, to strengthen Russia's economy. Now, Putin seems determined to build a stronger central government in Moscow and use it to tackle Russia's problems, from its struggling economy to its unruly regions. Putin is calling for an "active offensive" on crime, a stronger role for the judiciary, and the establishment of a civil-service meritocracy. On the economic front, he has created an advisory group that is looking into closing inefficient industrial enterprises such as truck-and-limo maker Zil. New social programs would cushion the blow to workers. Already, Putin has shown he's not afraid to use the power of the state. He is using all-out force against rebels in Chechnya. Many fear that Putin's Russia could be more authoritarian than either Yeltsin's or Gorbachev's. It will certainly be less amenable to Western ideas. But so far, Putin claims that he will abandon neither market economics nor democracy--only "adapt" them to the "realities of Russia." It will likely be months before Russians learn the exact nature of Putin's program. Right now, his most important aim is to win the election. A chief priority is avoiding heavy Russian casualties in Chechnya, where the rebels are putting up a tough fight. He also must decide how to deal with Yeltsin's former entourage. Voters are disgusted with the way tycoons such as Boris Berezovsky wielded power in the Kremlin. "Putin would send a very strong signal if he removed from his government those considered to be close to Mr. Berezovsky," says Michael A. McFaul, a Russia analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington. But Berezovsky and other so-called oligarchs have the money and media outlets that could swing the election. Putin simply may not be able to distance himself from the elite until after the vote, though he can make a start. He recently visited the Federal Railways Ministry, headed by Berezovsky crony Nikolai Aksyonenko, and blasted its employees for corrupt practices. Putin has also dismissed from the Kremlin staff Yeltsin's daughter, Tatiana Dyachenko, a target of corruption allegations who is close to Berezovsky. Some Russia watchers think Putin may try to ease the oligarchs' grip by offering immunity in exchange for returning part of their ill-gotten assets. But Putin may already be too compromised to make any such deals. After leaving the KGB in 1990, he went to work for then-Mayor Anatoly Sobchak in St. Petersburg. That's when he developed ties to Anatoly B. Chubais, later architect of Russia's much-criticized privatization program and now a political adviser to Putin. He also met emerging titans such as Vladimir Potanin, who is firmly backing the new President. Political opponents accused Putin of rigging privatization deals in favor of his buddies. Some Moscow sources predict that the only big change in Putin's Russia may be a reshuffling of the players, as a new crowd of Kremlin leeches replaces the old one. Still, if Putin could take on the tycoons, his popularity among ordinary Russians would soar. Russians are fed up--with greedy oligarchs, Mafia gangs, Chechen rebels, and shady banks that can't be trusted with savings. "People are thirsty for a strong leader," says Yuri Levada, a sociologist at Moscow's National Public Opinion Research Institute. "They are afraid of general disorder." DISASTROUS EFFECTS. The worst disorder is in the economy. It's still a mess, even though gross domestic product grew 1.5% in 1999, the best performance since the Soviet Union's breakup in 1991. Higher oil prices are helping Russia. But thousands of Russian companies barely function. They don't have the cash to buy materials or pay their workers, and they stay afloat by barter. Millions of Russians survive by growing their own food and working in the black market, estimated at 40% of GDP. And all through the Yeltsin years, the government failed to collect taxes efficiently, with disastrous effects on the country's medical and education system. It's a vicious circle that won't be broken until Russia reforms its tax and bankruptcy laws. Putin aims to use his "stronger state" to do that. For starters, he has charged a group of Western-minded liberal economists with crafting a new tax system. Putin wants to cut rates on businesses and individuals and simplify the Byzantine tax code. A likely target is the payroll tax, now a huge 40% of workers' wages. And while others before him have failed, Putin is likely to take a tougher line on tax cheats. About half of Russia's tax bill goes uncollected. Another key plank in Putin's plan is a government-run "industrial policy." Putin thinks the way to get growth is to encourage state, private, and foreign investment in high-tech industries such as aerospace. Defense enterprises, such as tank builders, are also expected to benefit from fresh subsidies or tax preferences. At the same time, Putin's advisory commission is examining an overhaul of the bankruptcy code to speed up the closure of unprofitable factories. Meanwhile, exporters to Russia should take note: If the Russian economy continues its recovery and the ruble strengthens, Putin may erect barriers to imports of such big-ticket items as cars and refrigerators. The new President also hopes to boost Russia's exports--not only of raw materials like oil but of manufactured goods, too. He'll create an agency that will offer exporters government guarantees for commercial loans. And he'll eventually push for Russian membership in the World Trade Organization. So far, Russian businesspeople and markets are reacting favorably to Putin. Shares of Gazprom and other companies have jumped. "He's the best choice of all available," says Alexei Krivenkov, co-founder of Port.Ru, a Russian-language Internet portal company based in New York and Moscow. "Give Putin the benefit of the doubt," adds Josef A. Bakaleynik, chief financial officer at Tyumen Oil Co. He is hopeful that the new President will slash the bureaucracy, then raise the remaining bureaucrats' salaries--so they will demand fewer bribes. BIG LAG. Still, it could take a generation for Russia to fix its economic problems. Putin seems to realize that. Even if Russia grows at the phenomenal rate of 8% a year, he says, it will take the country 15 years to reach the per capita GDP level of today's Portugal or Spain. Russia's per capita GDP of $1,800 is now about one-sixth that of Portugal and one-eighth that of Spain. Its paltry GDP of $190 billion is just one-fifth as big as China's and about one-fiftieth the size of America's. The long road ahead may be one reason he is appealing to Russians' patriotism. For now, at least, the Chechen war is playing into his hands. Even though the assault on Chechnya has been waged brutally, most Russians back the war. Indeed, the threat to the integrity of Russia from Chechnya is quite real. The current conflict began last August when Chechen-based rebels tried to declare an Islamic republic in next-door Dagestan, against the will of the Dagestanis. "ABSOLUTELY CYNICAL." If the war drags on, however, even the most patriotic Russians will grow weary. That's why Putin may have to reach a political agreement with the Chechens. He may turn out to be the only person in Russia with the credibility to cut a deal--just as general-turned-statesman Charles De Gaulle extracted France from Algeria, or retired Russian General Alexander Lebed ended the first Chechen war in 1996. "I don't exclude the possibility that a President Putin will grant Chechnya independence," says Andrei Piontkovsky, director of the Moscow-based Center for Strategic Studies. "He is an absolutely cynical man." Is Putin dangerous for the West? In the short term, probably not. But the longer term could be rockier, particularly if NATO angers Russia by inviting the Baltic states to become members. "Things are on a fine edge right now," says Robert Legvold, a Russia specialist at Columbia University. "You don't want to push the Russians too hard." Russia has drifted and suffered under the rule of the aging and ailing Yeltsin. Now it has a young and healthy leader, and millions of Russians are relieved. But they will be watching closely to see if Vladimir Vladimirovich is a nation-builder, a dictator--or both. Return to top |
|
|
|
Return to top TABLE The Acting President's Agenda THE CHALLENGE
TAXES Russia collects no more than half of its taxes,
leading to underfunding of state institutions and
delayed wage payments for state-employed
teachers, doctors, and civil servants.
ECONOMIC Although the economy grew 1.5% in 1999,
EFFICIENCY GDP was nearly halved in the 1990s. Thousands
of unprofitable enterprises are still operating,
draining resources, while the gray market is
estimated to represent 40% of GDP.
CORRUPTION Russia's bureaucracy is overflowing with
corrupt officials, while key business
figures have received favored treatment by
the Kremlin in return for political support.
UNRULY War is raging in separatist Chechnya, while in
REGIONS other regions, governors thumb their noses
at Moscow by refusing to pay their taxes.
government.
HIS PROPOSED SOLUTION
TAXES Implement a sweeping tax reform that
would cut payroll and other taxes, simplify
Russia's byzantine tax code, and bolster
collection.
ECONOMIC Introduce a new industrial policy that will
EFFICIENCY encourage state, private, and foreign
investment in high-tech and export-
oriented industries.
CORRUPTION May dismiss officials close to tycoons, or
even offer oligarchs pardons in exchange
for the return of looted assets.
UNRULY Defying Western criticism, Putin is using
REGIONS all-out force to battle Chechen rebels
and vows to create a stronger central
Return to top Return to top Commentary How Yeltsin Blew Russia's Big Chance (int'l edition) Boris N. Yeltsin is a lot like the country he ruled for most of the past decade. Like Russia, he's big, boisterous, and full of braggadocio. Most of all, he's unpredictable. Unexpected as it was, Yeltsin's sudden resignation on the last day of the millennium was very much in character. Unfortunately, so was his final act as President. By resigning, he speeds up the timetable for the next presidential election to March 26 from June. And just three hours before he resigned, he approved a law requiring each candidate to collect the signatures of up to 1 million registered voters in less than six weeks to win a place on the ballot. The accelerated schedule makes it tough for anyone but Yeltsin's chosen successor and protege, acting President Vladimir V. Putin, to get on the ballot or wage an effective campaign. Yeltsin wants to go down in history as the man who brought democracy, justice, and prosperity to Russia. But he has repeatedly tarnished his own legacy by skewing the rules in favor of insiders. He did it one last time on New Year's Eve. DAMAGING DEALS. Yeltsin failed to create a genuine democracy, a genuine market economy, or an independent legal system. He undoubtedly had good intentions in the euphoric days after he broke the back of the communist system in late 1991. But at key junctures, he--or his advisers--chose to make ultimately damaging compromises in order to win the support of elites for their reforms. The compromises started as tactical retreats. But they ended up sabotaging the entire system. In the early 1990s, Yeltsin aide Anatoly B. Chubais pushed through mass privatization by giving Soviet-era managers a controlling stake in the companies they ran. Freed from the oversight of government ministers but unfettered by U.S.-style securities laws, many managers stole company assets and ignored minority shareholders. Few companies were closed or restructured. Most infamous were the "loans-for-shares" deals in 1995. Bankers close to the Kremlin gained control of Russia's biggest oil companies for a song. In turn, they bankrolled his 1996 reelection campaign and used their control of big media companies to conceal his illness from voters and tar his Communist opponent, Gennady A. Zyuganov. True, Yeltsin took a risk by defying his advisers and deciding to hold the 1996 election even though he badly trailed Zyuganov in the polls. But his cronies manipulated the result through money and the media. Now, Yeltsin himself is manipulating the election for his successor. The earlier the better for Putin, whose popularity could wane if the war effort in Chechnya goes wrong. Putin may yet prove an effective President. But Yeltsin's machinations hardly make for an auspicious start to the new era. Of course, in Yeltsin's Russia, there is no such thing as a level playing field. Cronyism and corruption pollute the courts, the government, and the economy. The compromises created a caste of businesspeople with an unfortunate credo: Grab what you can as quickly as you can. Meanwhile, high taxes, bribe-taking bureaucrats, and the mob stifle entrepreneurs. Yeltsin deserves much credit for crushing the totalitarian Soviet system. Continuing the efforts of Mikhail Gorbachev, he gave Russians the freedom to speak out and travel freely. He allowed the other former Soviet republics to separate from Russia peacefully. Those achievements cannot be underestimated. But he squandered the goodwill of the Russian people and foreign investors by creating a corrupt regime. The man who climbed on the tank in 1991 to face down Soviet power missed a historic opportunity to create a just and prosperous Russia. Return to top |
|
|
Terms of Use | Privacy Notice |