|
|
![]() |

WHY THE PARTY WON'T BE OVER SOON
PROSPERITY Wall Street Journal reporters Bob Davis and David Wessel assert in Prosperity: The Coming 20-Year Boom and What It Means to You that three forces--technology, globalization, and education--will, instead of hurting Americans, help them stay on top of the world and curb the widening domestic income gap. As a result of developments in these areas, say the authors, America's middle class will, within the next 20 years, gain better jobs and improve its standard of living. Much of Prosperity's analysis of technological developments and globalization is not new, although here the spin is positive. But the authors' take on education is fresh and heartening. And all in all, though the book suffers from overreporting, it offers a persuasive case that we're not going to economic hell in a handbasket. The pair compares the current technological boom to the ascent of electricity at the turn of the century. They point out that, even though electricity was first exhibited in 1876 at the Philadelphia Centennial Exposition, industry did not achieve the productivity gains of the technology until the 1920s. So, too, Davis and Wessel say, it will take more than another generation for business to utilize today's new technologies fully. One problem, they point out, is that computers are poorly designed and hard to use. Moreover, they say, companies did not anticipate how computers would change their businesses. For instance, banks saw automated teller machines as clear productivity winners because they were cheaper than tellers and could be used 24 hours a day. But the banks failed to foresee that ATMs would change the nature of banking. Instead of taking out $150 once a week, customers now pop over to an ATM to withdraw $30 several times a week. ''Scowling tellers, it turns out, kept bank expenses down,'' the book concludes. Freer foreign trade will also mean more wealth, say the authors. Imports improve our standard of living because they bring a wider selection and, usually, lower prices. The shift of lower-paying jobs to developing countries--jobs once held by New England shoemakers and southern textile workers--has raised those nations' buying power, letting the U.S. ship more value-added goods. We have heard a lot of this before. The rise of high tech in Bangalore, India, to which the authors devote a chapter, has already been profiled, as has General Motors Corp.'s disastrous first foray into computerized manufacturing. But when the authors turn to the subject of education, their analysis is new and insightful. They do not insist that only the Ivy-League educated will do well in the next 20 years. Instead, they say, community colleges will play a greater role in providing the retraining and work skills that will enable the middle class to enjoy what they call ''broadly shared prosperity.'' Indeed, this is already happening. Among the success stories offered by the authors is that of Randy Kohrs. For years, the high school graduate moved through a series of minimum-wage jobs. Then, at age 37, Kohrs decided to go back to school. Entering a federal program that helps displaced workers get a college education, he earned a degree in respiratory therapy at Kirkwood Community College in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Kohrs now earns $28,475, along with such benefits as health insurance.
The book also examines the strategy of Cuyahoga Community College. So is prosperity for all right around the corner? Any economic forecast that goes out beyond the next year is almost always derailed by surprise developments, but Davis and Wessel play down the potential for shocks. And the book glosses over both the environmental impact of development in emerging nations and the devastation to those put out of work by the death of a domestic industry, such as textiles. Moreover, a chapter that's a virtual love letter to Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan does little to further their arguments. But these are minor quibbles for a book that seeks to assure America's middle class that we can stop worrying. We are not an endangered species--not as long as we use our computers for work, not to play solitaire. And it wouldn't hurt to learn a new skill at night school every once in a while.
BY KATHLEEN MADIGAN RELATED ITEMS
|

Updated Apr. 30, 1998 by bwwebmaster
Copyright 1998, by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use